Re: status of VLAN support in Debian/Linux in general

2004-09-11 Thread Jamie Baddeley
On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 08:47, Jonathan G - Mailing Lists wrote: Comment in line Andreas John wrote: 4.) Hint: If you setup VLAN with /etc/network/interfaces please keep in mind that the physical interface has to be up in order to create VLANs on it, i.e. you have to set somme (dummy?)

Re: whois.conf

2004-09-04 Thread Jamie Baddeley
On Sun, 2004-09-05 at 00:59, Marcin Sochacki wrote: apparently this can be done by setting up /etc/whois.conf, but I can't work out what the syntax is. There's no docs, or any examples...I've tried all the obvious approaches. OTOH you could also use the env variable: WHOIS_SERVER

Re: rfc2385 patch for debian kernels.

2004-08-26 Thread Jamie Baddeley
I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from backports.org.. 2.4.26 from sarge hmm. time to diff. jamie On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 17:50, Oliver Hitz wrote: Hi Jamie On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote: Has anyone successfully applied the MD5/BGP patch above

Re: rfc2385 patch for debian kernels.

2004-08-26 Thread Jamie Baddeley
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 18:36, Oliver Hitz wrote: On 26 Aug 2004, Jamie Baddeley wrote: I'm using that. But I'm applying against a 2.4.26 kernel-source from backports.org.. 2.4.26 from sarge No, the kernel from kernel.org. I should probably have been writing vanilla, not stock

Vtun

2004-05-12 Thread Jamie Baddeley
Hi, I'm using Vtun to do some encrypted tunnelling, and my Vtun client is refusing to forward packets. I've set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to 1, yet I see icmp requests coming in on the clients tun interface, but nothing leaves on the clients eth0 interface... has anyone come across something

Vtun

2004-05-12 Thread Jamie Baddeley
Hi, I'm using Vtun to do some encrypted tunnelling, and my Vtun client is refusing to forward packets. I've set /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward to 1, yet I see icmp requests coming in on the clients tun interface, but nothing leaves on the clients eth0 interface... has anyone come across something

Re: Server monitoring software

2003-12-08 Thread Jamie Baddeley
www.nagios.org. it rocks. jamie On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 22:07, Craig wrote: Hi Guys Is there software that we can install to monitor our servers and sms us if there are only problems ? Something like Big Brother but open source would be preferable. Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Re: Server monitoring software

2003-12-08 Thread Jamie Baddeley
www.nagios.org. it rocks. jamie On Mon, 2003-12-08 at 22:07, Craig wrote: Hi Guys Is there software that we can install to monitor our servers and sms us if there are only problems ? Something like Big Brother but open source would be preferable. Any suggestions will be appreciated.

Re: System Hardware Tracking

2003-12-03 Thread Jamie Baddeley
If you want something to build on, then maybe IRM might do it. php/mysql. We've hacked it too met our needs - it seems ok. It's a debian package too. jamie On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 06:35, Chris G. wrote: Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have no idea what's

Re: System Hardware Tracking

2003-12-03 Thread Jamie Baddeley
If you want something to build on, then maybe IRM might do it. php/mysql. We've hacked it too met our needs - it seems ok. It's a debian package too. jamie On Wed, 2003-12-03 at 06:35, Chris G. wrote: Well it's finally hit the point where we have a few machines where we have no idea what's

Re: Sendmail or Qmail ? ..

2003-09-04 Thread Jamie Baddeley
so how does exim compare in all of this? jamie On Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:10, Alex Borges wrote: It all depends qmail has a very non standard way of being managed. Its almost meta-unix. That said, its VERY flexible, extremely powerfull, once you get a hang of it INCREDEBLY EASY to manage.