Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > >> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). >> >>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >>> usually I note th

Re: bandwidth [SCANNED]

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
> On 4/12/04 3:20 PM, "Christofer Algotsson" wrote: > >> You need at least 256kbps per client (wich is a very low these days). >> >>> As it's a home building I suppose most of the traffic is web browsing >>> and email checking and most of the activity is at evening/night, when >>> usually I note th

Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up > to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times > crippled e3's), I would tend to take that "flat", or if money is a big > concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg. > > > Rgds, > Andreas >

Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price. --jeremy

Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
some internet radio listeners and some file up/download go up > to 10 Megbit. If your telco offers 10 Meg local loop (most times > crippled e3's), I would tend to take that "flat", or if money is a big > concern check for adsl 8meg/2meg. > > > Rgds, > Andreas >

Re: bandwidth

2004-04-12 Thread Jeremy D. May
personaly i would see how much you use now and base it on that. i would say no less then a burstable DS3(T3/E3), idealy i would personaly perfer to drop a FE line (about 100 megs) i know most in the US will let you run a burstable Fe using only like 60 megs of it for a reasonable price. --jeremy