Re: exim or postfix

2004-11-12 Thread John Goerzen
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:47:17PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote: On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote: i like the way it works. makes it easy to model the flow of mail from component to component. On the other hand, it introduces complexity into the system. It's a lot

Re: exim or postfix

2004-11-11 Thread John Goerzen
I just switched from Postfix to Exim. I am now a big fan of Exim. http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/08/latest-experiment-exim/ http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/11/exim-transition-successful/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of

Re: exim or postfix

2004-11-11 Thread John Goerzen
On 2004-11-11, Craig Sanders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +, John Goerzen wrote: a few comments, though: 1. synchronization detection - postfix has done this for years, except that it's called reject_unauth_pipelining. you enable it as one of the smtpd_

Value of backup MX

2004-11-09 Thread John Goerzen
I'm looking at redoing my mail setup due primarily to spam filtering. Over at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/multimx.html, they are suggesting not to use redundant mail servers unless needed for load balancing. The last time I set up a major mail server, which was indeed a few

Re: Value of backup MX

2004-11-09 Thread John Goerzen
On 2004-11-09, Steve Drees [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: John Goerzen wrote: I'm looking at redoing my mail setup due primarily to spam filtering. Over at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/multimx.html, they are suggesting not to use redundant mail servers unless needed for load