Tried changing
ServerName www.xyz.net
to
ServerName xyz.net
yet?
I'm just making some guesses here... never tried what you're doing. I always
use A records, not CNAME records as much as possible.
- Original Message -
From: "Y2KNET" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
Tried changing
ServerName www.xyz.net
to
ServerName xyz.net
yet?
I'm just making some guesses here... never tried what you're doing. I always
use A records, not CNAME records as much as possible.
- Original Message -
From: Y2KNET [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent:
I agree that something like this is needed badly in Debian.
However... considering there has been so much hassle over the boot floppies
alone, i doubt there will be much chance a kickstart-like proggie will make
it in.
- Original Message -
From: Duane Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Hi darlock,
Its simply to find out what the problem is.
Do a whois on "EsNic" and see if it can lookup your domain name. If it is
there, then the problem is with the DNS servers (or maybe the DNS servers
aren't even listed properly there?). If it isn't there your domain isn't
even registered.
Hi darlock,
Its simply to find out what the problem is.
Do a whois on EsNic and see if it can lookup your domain name. If it is
there, then the problem is with the DNS servers (or maybe the DNS servers
aren't even listed properly there?). If it isn't there your domain isn't
even registered.
If
Interestingly, I've been seeing that on many servers we operate.
We run unstable though...
Sometimes we get hundreds of those messages, with exactly the same problems
you experienced.
We always thought some script-kiddie was trying to find some buffer overflow
shxt on us. Is it?
Jason Lim
I have to agree with Chris.
Even with all of AOL's programmers and security people (haha), they are
still regularly successfully cracked.
Do you think you could come up with something to rival AOL? Well... maybe...
but good luck ;-)
Jason Lim
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Wagner"
I must agree. Netsaint is a superior system for a NOC, since you're not just
monitoring hosts, but also your network.
What's the point of knowing 50 odd hosts are down when the actual problem
lies with a switch connecting them all? I suppose you could GUESS, but why
do it when netsaint is
Actually, I have a related question.
We offering web hosting to our clients. When people run huge CGIs, normally
we are notified, and kill them manually. We've also got a small script we
run periodically to kill of any "stuck" or "hanged" processes by users' cgis
(we use suexec so they run under
We tried that too, but it doesn't seem to limit actual cgis. It does limit
the actual apache process. This is strange to us, as we though all child
processes would inherit the limit.
We don't use the stock suexec, because we recompiled it to use /home
Perhaps this has a factor to play?
-
Hi,
Zentek International does provide such a service using Debian servers.
If you would like more information, just mail me directly at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
As for the availability of other companies using Debian, i can tell you
that you'd be hard pressed to find even a handful. I think they use
I checked the communitech.net website... such as at their dedicated server
webpage
(http://www.communitech.net/hosting/dedicated/unix/packages.cgi )
and they all stated they run Redhat 6.1.
Maybe you could direct us to the correct webpage for debian hosting?
Actually... are they one and the same
Hi!
You know the web-enabled administration software used by Colbat servers?
I was wondering if anything for Linux (and hopefully debanized) was
similar?
It doesn't have to have a web interface, but something easy to use, fast
to
distribute, would be great.
I know about the Linuxconf
Actually I've heard the work on some sort of authenticated or secure DNS
system is doing well. Don't know where you could grab more info on it
though.. That would provide the more secure environment for doing DNS
updates.
- Original Message -
From: Robert Varga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
