Adrian von Bidder wrote:
If you believe their advertisement, Exabytes VXA tapes are a cost-effective
solution, compared to other tape solutions.
I have no experience with them, I just thought I'd point you in that
direction if you haven't investigated them yet.
I used some of these a few
Craig Sanders wrote:
- uw-imap-ssl (starting from inetd)
replace with something sane. dovecot or courier-imapd for example.
dovecot works with mbox and Maildir mail boxes, courier-imapd only with
Maildir. you probably have mbox if you're running an old sendmail machine.
it's a trivial
Kilian Krause wrote:
Hi Djalma,
my named.conf.local:
zone 0/25.36.247.200.in-addr.arpa {
i'd try making this read:
zone 36.247.200.in-addr.arpa {
for a start.. i.e. without the 0/25.
Yes, this would be problematic unless for some odd reason you had a
directory named 0.
The other
Juha-Matti Tapio wrote:
On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 08:23:31PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
Most people setting up round-robin DNS type setups for redundancy with
scripts to change things for failover get bit by these things:
[...]
- They don't understand that there might be multiple DNS servers
Fraser Campbell wrote:
On Thursday 07 October 2004 22:23, Nate Duehr wrote:
- They don't understand that there might be multiple DNS servers between
their top-level and the machine they're servicing (3X and 4X TTL)
Let's say that I have my local (desktop if you prefer) resolver (which I'll
... Lots of options, always.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Marcin Owsiany wrote:
Well, adding more disks to the setup is what I planned to do next. I
just want to make sure that the performance I get from the _current_
setup is normal.
Oh okay, sorry. Thought you were looking for a performance increase.
Nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
) and courierpop3d processes (7.2 logins per
second).
Start splitting the user directories across logical disks that are on
different platters, for goodness sake. Mount points overlaid below the
primary mount point by directory can easily do this for you.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
RAID != Backup!!!
RAID = if you write bad data to one disk, you get it everywhere.
Backup = If you write bad data to a disk, you can roll back to it.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Aug 23, 2004, at 7:07 AM, Volker Tanger wrote:
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 07:00:37 -0500 Penbrock [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hello Shannon,
Monday, July 19, 2004, 11:22:23 AM, you wrote:
Hello List!
I've been googling around for recorded info on how many static
files per second a 1.3GHz Pentium Celeron (1Gb RAM, 7200 RPM IDE
hardisk), Apache web server can serve before it starts getting slow.
The static
who have to make the money/redundancy-level
decisions.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
an experienced ISP after all :-)
You'll get it... you're really close. Your idea for the proxy is better
than my one above for the full blown web server... I'm just relating how
I've seen it done in large farms.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 20, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Fraser Campbell wrote:
On June 18, 2004 12:49 am, Nate Duehr wrote:
No, this isn't right. You must lower the TTL time at a bare minimum
2 *
(Current TTL) ahead of time. Why? Because nameservers out in the
real
world will not even query your nameservers again until
an experienced ISP after all :-)
You'll get it... you're really close. Your idea for the proxy is better
than my one above for the full blown web server... I'm just relating how
I've seen it done in large farms.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that left POP3 in the 80's where it belongs? ;-)
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 20, 2004, at 9:19 AM, Fraser Campbell wrote:
On June 18, 2004 12:49 am, Nate Duehr wrote:
No, this isn't right. You must lower the TTL time at a bare minimum
2 *
(Current TTL) ahead of time. Why? Because nameservers out in the
real
world will not even query your nameservers again until
Marcel Hicking wrote:
advertising mode on
BWCT offers several terminal servers with the usual ethernet access
and terminal server features. Apart from the interesting feature of
wireing them up via USB they offer relais ports to switch a reset
line or your ATX power switches. I'd estimate that
Marcel Hicking wrote:
advertising mode on
BWCT offers several terminal servers with the usual ethernet access
and terminal server features. Apart from the interesting feature of
wireing them up via USB they offer relais ports to switch a reset
line or your ATX power switches. I'd estimate that
Markus Schabel wrote:
i guess there must be some reason why eDirectory, ADS and Domino use
LDAP ;-)
Paid programmers who have too much time on their hands and project
managers that like buzzwords? ;-)
Nate
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble?
Markus Schabel wrote:
i guess there must be some reason why eDirectory, ADS and Domino use
LDAP ;-)
Paid programmers who have too much time on their hands and project
managers that like buzzwords? ;-)
Nate
on Linux was via tarball, Solaris and HP-UX had packages.
Winderz was an MSI or InstallShield program.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Foster wrote:
Hello List,
Our network has grown to the point where managing a plethora of
different backup software packages is consuming too much operator
on Linux was via tarball, Solaris and HP-UX had packages.
Winderz was an MSI or InstallShield program.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Martin Foster wrote:
Hello List,
Our network has grown to the point where managing a plethora of
different backup software packages is consuming too much operator time
specifically to come to a conclusion/decision/consensus QUICKLY are
very important to have ahead of time.)
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and administrators, very configurable, etc.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and administrators, very configurable, etc.
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in no
time. (Hardly worth writing an SOP for -- it's that easy. Just don't
select any packages from tasksel or from dselect during installation.
Then add only what you need.)
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe
in no
time. (Hardly worth writing an SOP for -- it's that easy. Just don't
select any packages from tasksel or from dselect during installation.
Then add only what you need.)
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-G3:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200401/
msg04032.html
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that are not available from the standard
distro.
# apt-cache search request-tracker
request-tracker1 - Request Tracker, a GPL'd Trouble Ticket System
request-tracker3 - Extensible trouble-ticket tracking system
# cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
RT is good stuff.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED
, and with every request
to change directories takes unusually long.
Are you logging all commands and do you have DNS lookups turned on in
your FTP server's logging setup? Smells like DNS lookups going slowly
to me.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
-G3:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-user/2004/debian-user-200401/
msg04032.html
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that are not available from the standard
distro.
# apt-cache search request-tracker
request-tracker1 - Request Tracker, a GPL'd Trouble Ticket System
request-tracker3 - Extensible trouble-ticket tracking system
# cat /etc/debian_version
testing/unstable
RT is good stuff.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and with every request
to change directories takes unusually long.
Are you logging all commands and do you have DNS lookups turned on in
your FTP server's logging setup? Smells like DNS lookups going slowly
to me.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Our developers at work prefer the real Sun SDK/JRE. Our standard is to
install it in /usr/local ... others may like things like /opt, etc.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
?
Our developers at work prefer the real Sun SDK/JRE. Our standard is to
install it in /usr/local ... others may like things like /opt, etc.
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Monday 12 January 2004 01:31 am, W.D.McKinney wrote:
Indeed, reminds me of the religious flame received when I posted using
qmail on my debian servers :-)
LOL! That was the best retort I've seen in all of my Monday-morning list
reading/catch-up.
Qmail on Debian... That there's a true
On Monday 12 January 2004 01:31 am, W.D.McKinney wrote:
Indeed, reminds me of the religious flame received when I posted using
qmail on my debian servers :-)
LOL! That was the best retort I've seen in all of my Monday-morning list
reading/catch-up.
Qmail on Debian... That there's a true
with a shell
script? :-)
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a shell
script? :-)
--
Nate Duehr, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My thoughts:
Agreed on the as fast a CPU as you can afford and the 10K RPM disk
comments. However I'm not a huge fan of SATA yet. There's been quite a
bit of discussion on various mailing lists of people having trouble with
them. I'm old-school and would prefer the more expensive SCSI
.
Fraser
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net
]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
-negotiating
with some Cisco switches. FYI.
At work, we simply set the Cisco's to whatever we want them to come up
at and the Intel's follow suit just fine.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:21:21PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:25:14AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Heres an interesting thing I tried. The cards came with a software disk
(needed msdos to boot) that allowed me to switch between 10Mb, 100Mb, and
Auto-neg. The cards
.
Can you just set the Cisco to not auto-negotiate and force the issue
from the switch instead of from the node?
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
--
To U
-negotiating
with some Cisco switches. FYI.
At work, we simply set the Cisco's to whatever we want them to come up
at and the Intel's follow suit just fine.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 10:21:21PM -0600, Nate Duehr wrote:
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 04:25:14AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
Heres an interesting thing I tried. The cards came with a software disk
(needed msdos to boot) that allowed me to switch between 10Mb, 100Mb, and
Auto-neg. The cards
database that do on
Postgres.
(Saw it in the docs somewhere and switched databases to get the
features...)
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
?
You may want to consider keeping a copy of sash around. (Statically
linked shell -- no shared libraries.) It can be useful for repairs
and/or doing intrusion analysis.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon
Gupta wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2001, Nate Duehr wrote:
AFAIK, works better with PostgreSQL than MySQL -- there's a couple of
features that don't with on Potato with a MySQL database that do on
Postgres.
I would really appreciate a pointer to which features. Not that I am
likely to change
ts, anyone?
You may want to consider keeping a copy of sash around. (Statically
linked shell -- no shared libraries.) It can be useful for repairs
and/or doing intrusion analysis.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key
tive
here... but I'm sure that the BIND maintainer would appreciate any solid
evidence you have that BIND has a problem.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
routing deamons like Zebra which can do the BGP
peering on a Linux system, but it probably makes more sense to go buy a
solid-state (no hard disk) router designed for the purpose and to learn
about how BGP works before attempting any of this...
Best wishes,
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fin
a little bit of creativity
and time to write one.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
of the implications it had then but it was only a temporal matter
in my case.
Great point. Upstream ISP's SHOULD be filtering out any IP's that are
not their own as part of their egress filters. Definitely this person
should check into that.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D
peering on a Linux system, but it probably makes more sense to go buy a
solid-state (no hard disk) router designed for the purpose and to learn
about how BGP works before attempting any of this...
Best wishes,
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61
thread belongs on debian-user, probably.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
a little bit of creativity
and time to write one.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
of the implications it had then but it was only a temporal matter
in my case.
Great point. Upstream ISP's SHOULD be filtering out any IP's that are
not their own as part of their egress filters. Definitely this person
should check into that.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF
nyone seen simple firwall system which allows eth0: eth0:1 eth0:2
to each have their own rules, to perform different restrictions on a
single NIC system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
things easy on me B-)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request
simple firwall system which allows eth0: eth0:1 eth0:2
to each have their own rules, to perform different restrictions on a
single NIC system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 10:31:33AM -0700, Kevin wrote:
http://granitecanyon.com http://centralinfo.net
Both free, both very dependable.
Granite Canyon reliable? You need to read some of the archives of the
bind-isc mailing list. Complaint after complaint.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL
On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 08:56:01AM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Agreed,
Let us know when you find them so we can get them in the RBL and ORBS
databases so our servers will reject mail from you.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5
-- good pointers/links to various open projects.
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
question
is, is it OK if the DNS server registered on InterNic as authoricative
is not a master but just a slave w/c depends on its data from an
external/different DNS server ?
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key
of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Nate Duehr [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG Key fingerprint = DCAF 2B9D CC9B 96FA 7A6D AAF4 2D61 77C5 7ECE C1D2
Public Key available upon request, or at wwwkeys.pgp.net and others.
pgpJILNOpApTE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
69 matches
Mail list logo
