Re: Apache config in LDAP

(although I am not quite sure how difficult that would end up being). -- Paul Fleischer // ProGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key fingerprint: 755A 9FB3 F7E4 DB62 8154 C5D6 381B BBCD 7BE1 FF30 Registered Linux User #166300 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: slapd and pam_ldap in debian?

I am using pam_ldap without any trouble on a test system running testing. It has been some while since I set the thing up, but it was pretty straightforward, once all the ldap entries were created. Have you checked what your auth.log says? -- Paul Fleischer // ProGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key

Re: Re[2]: users in apache

in apache 2.0 too, it would resolve a great number of problems for me ; -- Paul Fleischer // ProGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key fingerprint: 755A 9FB3 F7E4 DB62 8154 C5D6 381B BBCD 7BE1 FF30 Registered Linux User #166300 http://counter.li.org signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

postfix with LDAP smtp authentication

introducing an unnecesarry component. Is there any way to do direct LDAP smtp authentication? Or do I have to write such a patch myself?? Regards, -- Paul Fleischer // ProGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key fingerprint: 755A 9FB3 F7E4 DB62 8154 C5D6 381B BBCD 7BE1 FF30 Registered Linux User #166300 http

postfix with LDAP smtp authentication

introducing an unnecesarry component. Is there any way to do direct LDAP smtp authentication? Or do I have to write such a patch myself?? Regards, -- Paul Fleischer // ProGuy [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key fingerprint: 755A 9FB3 F7E4 DB62 8154 C5D6 381B BBCD 7BE1 FF30 Registered Linux User #166300 http

Re: Journaling FS for Production Systems

) or XFS. They really seem to be the most stable. Reiser is not bad, but I have had some terrible experiences with it - however, I do still use it, it is nice, but IMHO not suited for production systems yet (allthough I beleive that many people do actually use it in production). -- Paul Fleischer