Re: Value of backup MX

2004-11-09 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Dale E. Martin wrote: > > i usually have my backup MX accept everything and then don't treat > > them specially on the primary. thus, policy is still enforced on the > > primary, but there is a proper backup path *under my control* should > > the primary be unreachable for what

Re: help with BIND SRV

2004-10-06 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Wed, 6 Oct 2004, August MacBeth wrote: > thanks for your reply. I must have missed the section about how 'most' > software doesn't support SRV (http://dns.vanrein.org/srv/tools/).. It > seems like an incredible idea to me however, are there any alternatives > you could suggest? I'm after some k

Re: help with BIND SRV

2004-10-05 Thread Richard A Nelson
On Tue, 5 Oct 2004, August MacBeth wrote: > server# host ftp3.domain.net > server# telnet ftp3.domain.net 21 > telnet: could not resolve ftp3.domain.net/21: No address associated with > hostname > server# > > I've tried changing around the format of the RR, but nothing seems to > have an effect..