> You might want to try a hardware based balancer. Something like Local
Director.
Cisco bought Arrowpoint last year or so. I had the pleasure to play with
their CSS-11000 and it kicks ass!
The Local Director never was a good load balancer, it was more of a
intellingent routing switch doing load
> You might want to try a hardware based balancer. Something like Local
Director.
Cisco bought Arrowpoint last year or so. I had the pleasure to play with
their CSS-11000 and it kicks ass!
The Local Director never was a good load balancer, it was more of a
intellingent routing switch doing loa
Another way to accomplish that would be a Cisco router set to trunking.
Evenly dividing the traffic flow to two servers.
At 10:15 PM 4/11/01 -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
>At 04:56 PM 4/5/01 +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
>>I don't think transproxy will handle such a load quite well, but you
>>ca
Another way to accomplish that would be a Cisco router set to trunking.
Evenly dividing the traffic flow to two servers.
At 10:15 PM 4/11/01 -0400, Chris Wagner wrote:
>At 04:56 PM 4/5/01 +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
>>I don't think transproxy will handle such a load quite well, but you
>>c
At 04:56 PM 4/5/01 +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
>I don't think transproxy will handle such a load quite well, but you
>can try and find out :)
You might want to try a hardware based balancer. Something like Local Director.
---==---
___/``\___
0100
At 04:56 PM 4/5/01 +0200, Alson van der Meulen wrote:
>I don't think transproxy will handle such a load quite well, but you
>can try and find out :)
You might want to try a hardware based balancer. Something like Local Director.
---==---
___/``\___
0100
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:19:38PM +0200, Francis 'Dexter' Gois wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to set up a transparent proxying system here. We have a lot of
> traffic, so the server receiving the requests shall be heavy-loaded. I
> plan
> to follow this schema :
>
> (clients) - rou
Hi,
I intend to set up a transparent proxying system here. We have a lot of
traffic, so the server receiving the requests shall be heavy-loaded. I
plan
to follow this schema :
(clients) - router- internet (all traffic but :80)
- transproxy - squid load ba
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 04:19:38PM +0200, Francis 'Dexter' Gois wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to set up a transparent proxying system here. We have a lot of
> traffic, so the server receiving the requests shall be heavy-loaded. I
> plan
> to follow this schema :
>
> (clients) - ro
Hi,
I intend to set up a transparent proxying system here. We have a lot of
traffic, so the server receiving the requests shall be heavy-loaded. I
plan
to follow this schema :
(clients) - router- internet (all traffic but :80)
- transproxy - squid load b
10 matches
Mail list logo
