Hi!
Is there any way to order the PHP (mod_php) to log everything to
ErrorLog defined by Apache in VirtualHost section? In php.ini I see only
the possibility to specify the concrete global logfile or syslog, but a
such setup doesn't fit to virtual host scenario...
Thanks for your advic
Hi,
..seeing recent the exim vs postfix thread, and having both
apache-1.3.3x and apache-2.0.5x available on a box, is obviously
beyond overkill, it's pointless. ;-) So I'm choosing one. Figuring
out "which one?" has asking myself a lot of questions.
..more im
On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 08:34:11AM +0200, Alexandros Papadopoulos wrote:
> [sent this to debian-user, got no suggestions - I hope this is not too
> OT on this list]
>
> On a sarge system, I was using apt-cacher with apache. No problems
> there. Once I replaced apache with apac
also sprach Alexandros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.0929 +0100]:
> There's this already:
> helios:/etc/apache2/conf.d# ls -l apt*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 27 Nov 8 08:51 apt-cacher ->
> /etc/apt-cacher/apache.conf
>
> Does that mean it's included?
Yes.
> So it seems the cgi is
On Monday 08 November 2004 08:47, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Alexandros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.0734
> +0100]:
> > changing /etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf and then
> > reloading/restarting apache2 does not honor the changes.
>
> Well, you should not need to restart
also sprach Alexandros Papadopoulos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.08.0734 +0100]:
> changing /etc/apt-cacher/apt-cacher.conf and then
> reloading/restarting apache2 does not honor the changes.
Well, you should not need to restart apache2 since apt-cacher is
a CGI. Apparently, apache2 loads it perma
[sent this to debian-user, got no suggestions - I hope this is not too
OT on this list]
On a sarge system, I was using apt-cacher with apache. No problems
there. Once I replaced apache with apache2, apt-cacher works but no
longer accepts any configuration changes. I.e.
changing /etc/apt
On Friday 05 November 2004 19:47, "Francesco P. Lovergine"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:35:28AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> > My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files if you
> > have Apache configured for a single
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
> >
> > but this doesn't. unless apache has added thi
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:40:28AM +0100, Francesco P. Lovergine wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
> >
> > but this doesn't. unless apache has added thi
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:54:18AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst,,, wrote:
> >
> > ErrorLog "| mytrickyprog www.mydomain.com"
>
> Then what's the use? The point was to avoid having ErrorLog directives
> per vhost, since that increases the number of open files.
>
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 01:35:28AM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
> My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files if you have
> Apache configured for a single log file...
>
Uhm, not found in current sid archive
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
On Fri, Nov 05, 2004 at 09:09:16AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
>
> but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
> into this (about six months ago) the "suitab
On 04.11.2004 23:09, Craig Sanders wrote:
For ErrorLog you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
into this (about six months ago) the "suitable program" has no way of
separating the erro
you can pipe to a suitable program which does the same.
but this doesn't. unless apache has added this feature since i last looked
into this (about six months ago) the "suitable program" has no way of
separating the error logs for each virtual host, because it's just STDERR w
On Thursday 04 November 2004 09:11, Marek Podmaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
My clftools package allows you to split and mangle the log files
f limits.conf ... On another system it's even higher though
I've not changed anything. Anybody knows what changes this value?
Sönke
Am Mittwoch, 3. November 2004 23:42 schrieb Craig Sanders:
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote:
> > I have apache 1.3
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
> (something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (
On Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:11:13PM +0100, Marek Podmaka wrote:
> I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
> virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
> (something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
> example
Marek Podmaka wrote:
Hello,
I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
(something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
example www.abcq.sk and new.abcq.sk). This has many positives for
Hello,
I have apache 1.3 webserver hosting about 150 domains (more than 400
virtual hosts). Now I have separate error log for each domain
(something.sk) and separate combined log for each virtual host (for
example www.abcq.sk and new.abcq.sk). This has many positives for
me: easy to
Hi there, At the moment we are running apache 1.3.x on a debian woody
box with PHP/MySQL enabled for selected sites and also a shared verisign
cert (also for selected sites).
At the moment we store the config in MySQL and then have a script that
writes lots of config files to a conf/ dir (one
access to a particular browser (User-Agent).
I've not tried it but it certainly sounds possible.
On the other hand, there's a reason that it's recommended to run apache
without DNS resolution turned on, DNS can be _very_ slow!
--
Fraser Campbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wieslaw wrote:
| Hi
|
|>
|> Is it possible to use the Deny directive in to block IP
|> addresses that don't have a PTR record?
|
| Yes. You should put a IP address, or domain (A record)
|
| I tested on apache 1.3 and 2.0
|
it works i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Is it possible to use the Deny directive in to block IP
addresses that don't have a PTR record?
Or there is any other way to do this?
Dan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://eni
does, but based on whether the start of the address is e.g.
www.domain.com/scotland
www.domain.com/uk
www.domain.com/gb
www.domain.com/france
www.domain.com/francais etc.
I was thinking of using a huge list of Apache aliases to redirect all of these
to something more generic and approp
e in the local network.
(I have imported this hosts into bind)
Now I like to install on computer apache-rproxy...
My ADSL-Router forward the Incoming HTTP-Traffic to port
I have setup the httpd.conf following:
( '/etc/apache/httpd.conf' ) ___
/
| ##
| ##
On September 22, 2004 07:44 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> >
> > php_admin_flag engine off
> >
>
> hmm.. thats where I stopped investigating this option,
> I dont want to be editing config files.
Neither do I but in my case I anticipate 95% of the hosts being identical, if
I have to
On September 22, 2004 10:10 am, Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana wrote:
> I wonder how running a script inside a mod_rewrite rule is better that
> defining a new NameVirtualHost directive, moreover taking into account that
It's better (IMO) because I do not have to configure apache
El Miércoles 22 Septiembre 2004 12:12, Fraser Campbell escribió:
> On September 22, 2004 03:04 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> > running a script from mod_rewrite was not reliable, sometimes it just did
> > not work... restart apache and it worked again. maybe it was just the
> > ve
e host
<http://tamay-dogan.homelinux.net/> at <http://www.dyndns.org/>
Wildcards for my "host" is activated.
My ADSL Router (Netgear DM602FR) forward all HTTP traffic to IP
192.168.1.2 (my local DNS server / apache reverse-proxy) and port
where my reverse-proxy is h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Fraser >@2004.09.22_13:12:19_GMT+0200
> > 2) I wanted to enable / disable things like PHPengine for the virtual
> > ? ?host based on LDAP settings.
>
> You could do it in the script, if file extension is .php th
On September 22, 2004 03:04 am, Johann Botha wrote:
> running a script from mod_rewrite was not reliable, sometimes it just did
> not work... restart apache and it worked again. maybe it was just the
> version I used.
Hmm, I don't like the sounds of that. Hopefully it was just t
verride the defaults in some cases (SSL sites for example) but that can
> be done by adding normal rules in or containers.
I remember having a similar config when I last tried this, but..
running a script from mod_rewrite was not reliable, sometimes it just did
not work... restart apache and
esting but at this point
I see no reason why it will not work.
The basic concept is to create a directory and have apache serve it
automatically under the correct domain name (zero config apache). Let's say I
want to have wehave.net and www.wehave.net hosted on my server. I could
creat
Hi,
I'm setting up a new server and would like to use mod_vhost_alias, or other
mass virtual hosting method, if possible. mod_vhost_alias is very simple to
setup and works as advertised:
LoadModule vhost_alias_module /usr/lib/apache/1.3/mod_vhost_alias.so
UseCanonicalNam
right permissions etc.
>
> I have 10k users on LDAP, and could export them to mysql.
>
> Wouldn't mind to use apache2 on sarge.
>
> Any hints?
>
> José
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Is there a way to set up mod_dav with decent access controls?
I want to have each user on the server acces his own files only, so
their files fall under fs quota and have the right permissions etc.
I have 10k users on LDAP, and could export them to mysql.
Wouldn't mind to use apache2 on sarge
Hello
On one host I have, at peak times, roughly 1000 simultanous Apache
processes which serve MySQL intensive scripts that produce about the
same number of MySQL instances.
As 1000 connections are no longer sufficient, our customer demands a
stronger server but I'm unsure if it's p
On Mon, 2004-08-30 at 10:12, Paul Johnson wrote:
[...]
> > - What should I manage using packages and what should I manage
> > using source code?
>
> If it has a package, use the packages unless you absolutely must
> compile something from source that conflicts with how Debian compiled
>
<#secure method=pgp mode=sign>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Francisco Javier Fabra Caro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've installed recently Debian Sarge in a machine for ISP purposes.
> Now, my question is:
> - What should I manage using packages and what should I manage
>
rvice using proftpd + mysql and the httpd
using Apache. Do you know any how-to or guidelines to install a
VERY-SECURE http service? I mean, making that users can't access to
the filesystem using a php script, for example..
Thanx in advance.
Cheers!
fabRiX
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Wed, Aug 18, 2004 at 08:21:26PM +0200, Patrick Donker wrote:
> Jacob S. wrote:
>
> >By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else
> >through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640.
> >
> >I know php has a umask a
Jacob S. wrote:
By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else
through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640.
I know php has a umask and a chmod function that could help with this,
but this only fixes it for scripts that use php. Isn't there a w
By default, when a file is uploaded via a php script or anything else
through apache, it has permissions of 644. I would like this to be 640.
I know php has a umask and a chmod function that could help with this,
but this only fixes it for scripts that use php. Isn't there a way to
chang
Robert Waldner wrote:
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:50:13 +1000, Russell Coker writes:
Maybe the thing to do would be to write a server that establishes the HTTP
protocol and then sets the TCP window size to zero (to tar-pit connections).
Such a server program could listen on every IP address that's no
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 20:50:13 +1000, Russell Coker writes:
>Maybe the thing to do would be to write a server that establishes the HTTP
>protocol and then sets the TCP window size to zero (to tar-pit connections).
>Such a server program could listen on every IP address that's not used for a
>rea
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 19:38, Michelle Konzack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Am 2004-08-08 15:32:51, schrieb Russell Coker:
> > On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:56, "Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
> > > IIS worm attacks? Then blocks these IPs in r
Am 2004-08-08 15:32:51, schrieb Russell Coker:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:56, "Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
> > IIS worm attacks? Then blocks these IPs in real time?
>
> Why bother? They can't do any harm, and the bandwidth that they
On Sun, 2004-08-08 at 23:43, Craig Sanders wrote:
> the notice you send them should tell them exactly what is going on, exactly
> what they have to do, and the consequences of what will happen (i.e. their site
> will be unreachable) if they don't.
You could also host the site on multiple ip addre
On Sun, Aug 08, 2004 at 03:32:51PM +1000, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:56, "Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes IIS worm attacks? Then
> > blocks these IPs in real time?
>
> Why bother? They can't do any harm, and the ban
"Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
> IIS worm attacks?
awstats
> Then blocks these IPs in real time?
Not sure about that. Not sure why it's worth the bother, since it's not
like Apache is vulnerab
On Sat, 7 Aug 2004 14:56, "Shannon R." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
> IIS worm attacks? Then blocks these IPs in real time?
Why bother? They can't do any harm, and the bandwidth that they take is
usually a small portion of the total bandwidth.
Shannon R. wrote:
Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
IIS worm attacks? Then blocks these IPs in real time?
Would also be nice if it'll unblock those IPs after a
certain amount of time.
Thanks!
Shannon
Try Early Bird, does a great job
http://www.treachery.net/~jdyson/earlybird/inde
Is there a debian package wherein the app recognizes
IIS worm attacks? Then blocks these IPs in real time?
Would also be nice if it'll unblock those IPs after a
certain amount of time.
Thanks!
Shannon
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Address AutoC
Jacob S. wrote:
Has anybody seen this before?
I have not experienced this problem before, but I have seen several
threads here on Debian-user that resolved it by uninstalling the
php4-imap package.
Alternatively, you should be able to simply disable php4-imap in your
php.ini file to see if it is t
ed
> packages have been upgraded to "Testing". These include
> php(4.3.4-4) and all its dependencies including apache(1.3.31-2).
> and libapache-mod-perl(1.29.0.2-9). These are the latest "testing"
> release versions.
>
> Recently I did an "apt-get upgr
including apache(1.3.31-2).
and libapache-mod-perl(1.29.0.2-9). These are the latest "testing"
release versions.
Recently I did an "apt-get upgrade" and it downloaded and installed
the above version of apache. Afterwards it would not start, it
failed without showing an error o
If you want to change (or remove) the apache banner, have a gander (before
you compile it, etc) at:
apache_1.3.29/src/include/httpd.h
& grep for '1.3.29'
HTH.
> you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at
> all.
> I couldn't get it
If you want to change (or remove) the apache banner, have a gander (before
you compile it, etc) at:
apache_1.3.29/src/include/httpd.h
& grep for '1.3.29'
HTH.
> you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at
> all.
> I couldn't get it
you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at all.
I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
Fraser Campbell said:
>> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
> ServerSignature On
> ServerTokens Prod
you can turn if off with mod_rewrite so it does not show product type at all.
I couldn't get it to work, but you could do it
Fraser Campbell said:
>> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
> ServerSignature On
> ServerTokens Prod
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 10:39, Robert Page wrote:
> I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
I use these directives:
ServerSignature On
ServerTokens Prod
This way people know I'm running apac
Subject: Apache banner
Hi Guys
Is there any way of changing the banner in Apache like you can for proftpd
lets say?
Without having to tamper with the Apache source ?>
Thinking of a runtime option for the config file ?
Thanks
Craig
Hi Guys
Is there any way of changing the banner in Apache like you can for
proftpd lets say?
Without having to tamper with the Apache source ?>
Thinking of a runtime option for the config file ?
Thanks
Craig
On Tuesday 06 April 2004 10:39, Robert Page wrote:
> I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
> the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
I use these directives:
ServerSignature On
ServerTokens Prod
This way people know I'm running apac
I think to actually change it you need to edit the source but you can use
the ServerSignature directive to switch it off.
-Original Message-
From: Craig Schneider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 06 April 2004 15:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Apache banner
Hi Guys
Hi Guys
Is there any way of changing the banner in Apache like you can for
proftpd lets say?
Without having to tamper with the Apache source ?>
Thinking of a runtime option for the config file ?
Thanks
Craig
Frontpage Extensions on a debian box
with apache I suggest u first try out WebDAV (www.webdav.org).
Thanks For those who helped/replied to my post :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2004 03:23
To: David Ross
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
S
Frontpage Extensions on a debian box
with apache I suggest u first try out WebDAV (www.webdav.org).
Thanks For those who helped/replied to my post :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: mimo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 March 2004 03:23
To: David Ross
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
I have managed to set this up using mod-mirfak
(libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak). I think I had to hack it a bit - let
me know if it doesnt work immediately.
mimo
David Ross wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the
I have managed to set this up using mod-mirfak
(libapache-mod-frontpage-mirfak). I think I had to hack it a bit - let
me know if it doesnt work immediately.
mimo
David Ross wrote:
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the patch from
ftp://ftp.rtr.com/pub/fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z and gunzipped it. From
there on I followed the following instructions:
apt-get source apache
cd apache-1.3.26/upstream
Hi All
I am trying to install FrontPage Extensions support with Apache 1.3.26
on a Debian Woody box. I got the patch from
ftp://ftp.rtr.com/pub/fp-patch-apache_1.3.22.Z and gunzipped it. From
there on I followed the following instructions:
apt-get source apache
cd apache-1.3.26/upstream
Hi!:) I am Brazilian, my English not good, sorry..
I have a doubt.
I need to limit definitive memory and processor for script in CGI,
specifically in COBOL. How to make this in the Apache?
Thanks.
Marcelo Barbosa :)
Hi!:) I am Brazilian, my English not good, sorry..
I have a doubt.
I need to limit definitive memory and processor for script in CGI,
specifically in COBOL. How to make this in the Apache?
Thanks.
Marcelo Barbosa :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
Hello
What is the best way to estimate the memory requirements of say 1200
Apache Instances on a server when they currently look like this and
I do not expect great variability due to PHP doing mallocs or similar?
AFAIK those numbers are roughly the memory that the parent process uses
(which is
Hello
What is the best way to estimate the memory requirements of say 1200
Apache Instances on a server when they currently look like this and
I do not expect great variability due to PHP doing mallocs or similar?
AFAIK those numbers are roughly the memory that the parent process uses
(which is
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 17:42, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
>
> One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
>
On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 02:14, Timo Veith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
One thing I have done in the past to deal with such problems is to put
"ulimit -t 600" in the start script for apache. Then when apache
At 04:47 PM 2/28/2004, Timo Veith wrote:
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Timo, there are chats out there which may behave less, uh, poorly than this
particula
Thank you for your help Jeff.
I will investigate this a little more, but I don't think I will compile my
own apache binary for this issue. Anyway I will tell the user to stop his
chat thing.
Again, thanks a lot.
Kind regards,
Timo
Am Samstag, 28. Februar 2004 20:56 schrieb Jeff S Wh
e app level issue is and how it could be done properly -- being more
> of a developer than sysadmin.
No, If apache were trying to flock the file, the strace output would
indicate that by showing an flock(2) system call in progress.
> How do you find the stability of Apache mod_perl?
We do not
On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 02:56:12PM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> PHP is the single biggest cause of shared server problems at my company.
> I wish the PHP CGI stuff worked right, as if it did, we would opt to use
> that instead of the Apache PHP module. It may be slower, but at
At 02:56 PM 2/28/2004, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
Barring that, though, what your apache processes are doing is trying to
read that file, /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log, over and
over again, most likely in a `tail -f` nature, but no new data is appearing.
Jeff, do you think that the
On Sat, 2004-02-28 at 13:48, Timo Veith wrote:
> apache 24290 root8r REG 8,17 13115 25739308
> /home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat/php_chat_log
> I tried gdb, but there are no debug symbols,
> that's the default with most debian packages I assume.
It's a s
d, and of course the information
> in the remaining columns to the right are details about that
> descriptor.
COMMAND PID USER FD TYPE DEVICE SIZE NODE NAME
apache 24290 root cwdDIR 8,17 4096 25739266
/home/jebu0001/homepage/jens/chat
apache 24290 root rtdDIR
process that generated the above strace output. To find that out, make
sure you have the "lsof" package installed, and issue `lsof -p `,
then take note of the FD column in the output. That indicates which
file descriptor is being examined, and of course the information in the
remaining co
Hi list,
today I noticed that 2 apache procs are using all cpu. ps shows them like
this:
www-data 24290 97.4 0.3 142832 7420 ? RFeb27
1651:39 /usr/sbin/apache
www-data 24916 97.8 0.2 141408 5700 ? RFeb27
1651:11 /usr/sbin/apache
I could just restart apache or kill those
On Friday 20 February 2004 16.24, Erik Dörnbach wrote:
...
Hi,
Could you please avoid starting a new thread every time you reply to a
message?
Thanks
-- vbi
--
It is easier to write an incorrect program than understand a correct one.
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
wow!
> > > #!/usr/bin/perl
> > >
> > > while (<>) {
> > >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
>
> chomp($password);
>
> > >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> > > $username, $password);
> > > }
Nice one, this did it - thank you all for contributions!
Ha
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > untested, quick and dirty
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > while (<>) {
> >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
chomp($password);
> >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> > $
On Fri, Feb 20, 2004 at 04:05:15PM +0100, Erik D?rnbach wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> > untested, quick and dirty
> >
> > #!/usr/bin/perl
> >
> > while (<>) {
chomp;
> >($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
> >system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> > $username, $pa
Hi again,
> untested, quick and dirty
>
> #!/usr/bin/perl
>
> while (<>) {
>($username, $password)=split /:/, $_, 2;
>system("/usr/bin/htpasswd", "-b", "/path/to/htaccess",
> $username, $password);
> }
Mmmh, I'm not sure why, it looks right, but now I noticed, it doesn't
work. The outp
On Fri Feb 20, 2004 at 12:0533PM +0100, Erik Dörnbach wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> just a quickie, I need to add a massive load of users for apache
> authentication, I have the usernames and associated passwords in
> a plain text file, one line per user like:
>
> :
> :
> .
Hello Michael,
> untested, quick and dirty
Works as advertised, you saved my day! :)
OTOH I should someday learn to hack these quickies myself...
Alaaf,
Erik
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello list,
just a quickie, I need to add a massive load of users for apache
authentication, I have the usernames and associated passwords in
a plain text file, one line per user like:
:
:
...
Database auth would be an overshot, these users will likely never
change.
Is there an easy way to
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:27, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > > got:
> > >
> > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Re
On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > got:
> >
> > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Replication.html
> > http://jeremy.zawodny.com/mysql/managing-mys
On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 17:27, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 19, 2004 at 03:05:34PM +0100, Jan Kokoska wrote:
> > On Mon, 2004-01-19 at 12:30, Francis Tyers wrote:
> > > hmm, you might want to look into mysql replication, i just googled and
> > > got:
> > >
> > > http://www.mysql.com/doc/en/Re
1 - 100 of 933 matches
Mail list logo
