Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > there is another dns auth serevr project that ripe started, but i > can't remember the name nsd. It's in Debian. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie+

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:03:43PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 17 lines which said: > > That's nsd and it is no longer a project. > > URL? apt-get install nsd :-) Upstream is http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/index.html> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread j
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:06:51AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around > You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, i was faster then bind on those test that i made, but i don't use it because it lacks some "bind features".oh an

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > - v8 is stable 8.4 broke TSIG (secure zone transfers, RFC 2845), which worked before. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-23 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 25 lines which said: > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, PowerDNS is much slower than BIND (even PowerDNS with its BIND bac

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-22 Thread Thomas Lamy
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > It is partly a matter of taste. > > - v8 is faster > - v8 is stable > - v8 does not have "views" OTOH different views can't use the same > files. :( bad bad bad > - v9 can be used with db/sq

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-22 Thread W.D. McKinney
"and djb is not compatible with working OSes. :)" As in which OS that is not compatible ? And Bind is ? Dee On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > > It is partly a matter of taste. > > - v8 is faster > -

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-22 Thread j
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > It is partly a matter of taste. - v8 is faster - v8 is stable - v8 does not have "views" OTOH different views can't use the same files. :( bad bad bad - v9 can be used with db/sql - but i would recommend powerdns for that

Re: BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-22 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:34:17PM +0300, Evgeny Boksha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 13 lines which said: > please - tell me something about preferred vesion of BIND: 8 or 9 ? It is partly a matter of taste. Sooner or later, BIND8 will be officially unsupported so I would not advise

BIND 8 or 9 version ?

2003-07-17 Thread Evgeny Boksha
hi2all please - tell me something about preferred vesion of BIND: 8 or 9 ? Is 9 version more better than 8 ? Should I to upgrade from my 8.3 up to 9 ? Debian 3.0_r1 thx2all -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]