On Tue, 22 Jul 2003 17:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> there is another dns auth serevr project that ripe started, but i
> can't remember the name
nsd. It's in Debian.
--
http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie+
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 12:03:43PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 17 lines which said:
> > That's nsd and it is no longer a project.
>
> URL?
apt-get install nsd :-)
Upstream is http://www.nlnetlabs.nl/nsd/index.html>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
On Wed, Jul 23, 2003 at 09:06:51AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> > (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around
> You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed,
i was faster then bind on those test that i made, but i don't use it
because it lacks some "bind features".oh an
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> - v8 is stable
8.4 broke TSIG (secure zone transfers, RFC 2845), which worked before.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 11:53:53PM +0200,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 25 lines which said:
> (powerdns is fastest authoritive dns server around
You must be kidding, on every benchmark we performed, PowerDNS is much
slower than BIND (even PowerDNS with its BIND bac
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > It is partly a matter of taste.
>
> - v8 is faster
> - v8 is stable
> - v8 does not have "views" OTOH different views can't use the same
> files. :( bad bad bad
> - v9 can be used with db/sq
"and djb is not compatible with working OSes. :)"
As in which OS that is not compatible ? And Bind is ?
Dee
On Tue, 2003-07-22 at 13:53, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
>
> > It is partly a matter of taste.
>
> - v8 is faster
> -
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 05:06:39PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> It is partly a matter of taste.
- v8 is faster
- v8 is stable
- v8 does not have "views" OTOH different views can't use the same
files. :( bad bad bad
- v9 can be used with db/sql - but i would recommend powerdns for that
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 06:34:17PM +0300,
Evgeny Boksha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 13 lines which said:
> please - tell me something about preferred vesion of BIND: 8 or 9 ?
It is partly a matter of taste. Sooner or later, BIND8 will be
officially unsupported so I would not advise
hi2all
please - tell me something about preferred vesion of BIND: 8 or 9 ?
Is 9 version more better than 8 ?
Should I to upgrade from my 8.3 up to 9 ?
Debian 3.0_r1
thx2all
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10 matches
Mail list logo