>-Original Message-
>From: Rich Puhek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, February 19, 2004 04:44 PM
>To: 'W.D.McKinney'
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: Bayes filter at ISPs
>
>
>
>W.D.McKinney wrote:
>
>>
>> We liked SA
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 06:09, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> I suppose many of you use Bayesian spamfilters at the ISP level.
> I'd like to ask how do you teach it to separate ham and spam
> correctly? In particular, how do I select a representative set
> of ham and spam? Is it a good idea to deploy bogof
W.D.McKinney wrote:
We liked SA but was very tired of the perl usage on the MTA. Se we
searched and found the Barracuda. Now we have Bayesian and more and a
very nice solution, not on the MTA. I have not looked back.
Regards,
Dee
Why didn't you use spamc/spamd? Allows moving the perl (and all
On Thu, 2004-02-19 at 03:09, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> I'm considering replacing the current SpamAssasin to a true
> Bayasian filter (bogofilter, actually) on a mail server, because
> in personal daily usage, it has proven to be a better (faster
> and more accurate) solution for me.
>
> I suppose many
On Thursday 19 February 2004 13.09, Adam ENDRODI wrote:
> I'd like to ask how do you teach it to separate ham and spam
> correctly? In particular, how do I select a representative set
> of ham and spam? Is it a good idea to deploy bogofilter for an
> entire organization at all?
Run spamassassin
I'm considering replacing the current SpamAssasin to a true
Bayasian filter (bogofilter, actually) on a mail server, because
in personal daily usage, it has proven to be a better (faster
and more accurate) solution for me.
I suppose many of you use Bayesian spamfilters at the ISP level.
I'd like
6 matches
Mail list logo
