PHP is not your perfect "template system"; even though it capable of
nice and tidy simple web pages, it is worse than embedded HTML in Perl
for producing complex pages and large sites.
So, even PHP has a problem to solve regarding separation of code and
appearance. For that, there are templates s
Speaking of templates have you considered PHP? I would consider that the
ultimate template system and the ultimate customization vehicle. Instead of
relying on unreliable client side interpretation of style sheets and
javascript you have a controllable environment on the server side. Think
about
PHP is not your perfect "template system"; even though it capable of
nice and tidy simple web pages, it is worse than embedded HTML in Perl
for producing complex pages and large sites.
So, even PHP has a problem to solve regarding separation of code and
appearance. For that, there are templates s
Speaking of templates have you considered PHP? I would consider that the
ultimate template system and the ultimate customization vehicle. Instead of
relying on unreliable client side interpretation of style sheets and
javascript you have a controllable environment on the server side. Think
about
My two cents.
I agree that using a template driven system is much better than CGI.pm,
especially if you are
using CSS. Whether you do a roll your own template processor or use
HTML::Template, it works
to allow the design of the site to be separated from the function of it. I
create some of the
My two cents.
I agree that using a template driven system is much better than CGI.pm, especially if
you are
using CSS. Whether you do a roll your own template processor or use HTML::Template, it
works
to allow the design of the site to be separated from the function of it. I create some
of the
CSS is not deprecated. It is not reliable for positioning but it is quite
usable for defining text and character styles. If you have ever
changed all the font tags in a web site, you will be a CSS fan.
If you attempt to validate your HTML against w3.org's validator, you
are required to be a fan
CSS is not deprecated. It is not reliable for positioning but it is quite
usable for defining text and character styles. If you have ever
changed all the font tags in a web site, you will be a CSS fan.
If you attempt to validate your HTML against w3.org's validator, you
are required to be a fan
Ah, "together". Well there's nothing that I know of that would cause a
problem simply by virtue of them being used together. CGI.pm is nothing
more than html shorthand so that can't really interfere with anything else,
unless there's some bug that spits out bad code. They're pretty much self
con
Erik Grinaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:30:18:05:37+0100] scribed:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:26, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > Cascading Style Sheets. Deprecated. I have seen so many bad uses of style
> > sheets it makes me want to cry out in anger. So just don't use them unless
> > there's no oth
Heheh, nah no flamewar. Everything you said was strictly speaking true.
But at this stage style sheets are like giving a random person off the
street a loaded gun. Style sheets can be used to great effect but just be
sure u truly know what ur doing. And do testing testing testing. A good
regimi
Ah, "together". Well there's nothing that I know of that would cause a
problem simply by virtue of them being used together. CGI.pm is nothing
more than html shorthand so that can't really interfere with anything else,
unless there's some bug that spits out bad code. They're pretty much self
con
Erik Grinaker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003:12:30:18:05:37+0100] scribed:
> On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:26, Chris Wagner wrote:
> > Cascading Style Sheets. Deprecated. I have seen so many bad uses of style
> > sheets it makes me want to cry out in anger. So just don't use them unless
> > there's no oth
Heheh, nah no flamewar. Everything you said was strictly speaking true.
But at this stage style sheets are like giving a random person off the
street a loaded gun. Style sheets can be used to great effect but just be
sure u truly know what ur doing. And do testing testing testing. A good
regimi
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:26, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Cascading Style Sheets. Deprecated. I have seen so many bad uses of style
> sheets it makes me want to cry out in anger. So just don't use them unless
> there's no other way to do it. They are almost guaranteed to cause
> compatibility problems
I can tell you some stuff about that right now. CGI.pm is just a quick and
dirty module that will save on some typing in your perl script. Emphasis on
some. If you're doing anything more than basic html tags it quickly becomes
not worth it anymore. Writing tag attributes takes up more time and
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 17:26, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Cascading Style Sheets. Deprecated. I have seen so many bad uses of style
> sheets it makes me want to cry out in anger. So just don't use them unless
> there's no other way to do it. They are almost guaranteed to cause
> compatibility problems
I can tell you some stuff about that right now. CGI.pm is just a quick and
dirty module that will save on some typing in your perl script. Emphasis on
some. If you're doing anything more than basic html tags it quickly becomes
not worth it anymore. Writing tag attributes takes up more time and
Please, somebody point me to URL's that provide examples and best
practices of using CSS2, CGI.pm and XHTML v1.x.
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.
Please, somebody point me to URL's that provide examples and best
practices of using CSS2, CGI.pm and XHTML v1.x.
--
Best Regards,
mds
mds resource
877.596.8237
-
Dare to fix things before they break . . .
-
Our capacity for understanding is inversely proportional to how much
we think we know.
20 matches
Mail list logo
