On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:46 +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
>Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
>
>A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
>the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
>the data is written to the disk t
On Tue, 10 Feb 2004 21:22:46 +0100, J.J. van Gorkum wrote:
>Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
>
>A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
>the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
>the data is written to the disk t
George Georgalis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:44PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behavi
On 10 Feb 2004, Robin Vley wrote:
> I was actually thinking of building a fileserver running with a SCSI
> RAID5 array in it, and then just NFS the share out to a couple of
> webserver frontends. Anyone using such a solution, or am I overlooking
> something completely here? Round robin DNS, combine
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:44PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
>--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
>>
>>A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
>>the
George Georgalis wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:44PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal beha
On 10 Feb 2004, Robin Vley wrote:
> I was actually thinking of building a fileserver running with a SCSI
> RAID5 array in it, and then just NFS the share out to a couple of
> webserver frontends. Anyone using such a solution, or am I overlooking
> something completely here? Round robin DNS, combine
On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 01:32:44PM -0700, Michael Loftis wrote:
>
>
>--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
>>
>>A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
>>the
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
the data
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 21:06, Robin Vley wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>
> >Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> >described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> >damned share out of a server and off w
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
>described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
>damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
>I have the feeling that would put a fast
--On Tuesday, February 10, 2004 21:22 +0100 "J.J. van Gorkum"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, a big one : NFS is non-atomic in it's writing...
A write action to the (NFS) disk can be interrupted (normal behaviour in
the NFS world). So when the software (even the disk driver) reports that
the da
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 21:06, Robin Vley wrote:
> On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>
> >Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> >described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> >damned share out of a server and off w
On Mon, 09 Feb 2004 19:55:55 -0600, Alex Borges wrote:
>Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
>described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
>damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
>I have the feeling that would put a fast
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:55, Alex Borges wrote:
> Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
http://www.lustre.org/docs/lustre.pdf is a
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not shure
On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 02:55, Alex Borges wrote:
> Would anyone be so kind as to point me to a link where this need may be
> described? Because... through my limited knowledge, id nfs or samba the
> damned share out of a server and off we go...:)...
>
http://www.lustre.org/docs/lustre.pdf is a
This seems to be another one
http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm
Michael Loftis wrote:
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Im not sh
El lun, 09-02-2004 a las 19:23, Michael Loftis escribió:
> Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
> volume, you need a FS capable of such.
Ah yes...well doh... i didnt think of that...thx
Ok... You can tell i dont know much about this matters. I just want to
learn a
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Im not shure i follow. If you've already got the SAN, why the need of a
DFS?
I thought it would just expo
El lun, 09-02-2004 a las 19:23, Michael Loftis escribió:
> Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
> volume, you need a FS capable of such.
Ah yes...well doh... i didnt think of that...thx
Ok... You can tell i dont know much about this matters. I just want to
learn a
Im not shure i follow. If youve already got the SAN, why the need of a
DFS?
I thought it would just export you its volumes and youd see it as scsi
devices?
El lun, 09-02-2004 a las 14:44, J.J. van Gorkum escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Can sombody point me in the right direction for cluster Filesystem
> sup
Yes but if you have need of sharing a single filesystem, on a single
volume, you need a FS capable of such.
--On Monday, February 09, 2004 18:33 -0600 Alex Borges <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Im not shure i follow. If you've already got the SAN, why the need of a
DFS?
I thought it would just expo
Im not shure i follow. If youve already got the SAN, why the need of a
DFS?
I thought it would just export you its volumes and youd see it as scsi
devices?
El lun, 09-02-2004 a las 14:44, J.J. van Gorkum escribió:
> Hi,
>
> Can sombody point me in the right direction for cluster Filesystem
> sup
Hi,
Can sombody point me in the right direction for cluster Filesystem
support (that will work on Debian) to be used in combination with a SAN?
(Compaq MSA1000)
I have found:
- luster (clusterFS) the say they have support for Linux 2.4.x but the
systenms segfault on vanilla 2.4.20 kernels...
-
Hi,
Can sombody point me in the right direction for cluster Filesystem
support (that will work on Debian) to be used in combination with a SAN?
(Compaq MSA1000)
I have found:
- luster (clusterFS) the say they have support for Linux 2.4.x but the
systenms segfault on vanilla 2.4.20 kernels...
-
26 matches
Mail list logo
