Re: new dial in server - pppd hangs on connec

2003-08-14 Thread Korey Renner
Well, that problem was solved, but here is my original problem which I alluded to briefly in my first email. Thus far, we have been unsuccessful in getting several Windows XP PCs to connect to either Debian dial up system. We have no problem with Windows 2000 or Windows 98. When a Windows XP sys

Re: new dial in server - pppd hangs on connec

2003-08-14 Thread Korey Renner
Hi all .. I discovered my problem .. I have a bad serial DB25 to DB9 converter. I guess not all the line signals were going through. That, or a bad serial port, but its working now on a different serial port. Thank you -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscri

new dial in server - pppd hangs on connect

2003-08-14 Thread Korey Renner
I'm setting up a server for modem dial using debian woody + security. This is meant to replace a debian 2.2 server which works fine, except that Windows XP wont connect to it. My new server is having problems, however. I am hoping someone can get me going in the right direction. I have tried m

Configuring ISDN Dial-In

2002-09-05 Thread Torsten Schlabach
some ISP using ISDN.   Actually, I got ISDN set up to the point that I can dial out; I also believe I have configured dial-in; just it does not work an I don’t know why. When clients try to dial the box picks up and hangs up again immediately. In the /var/log/syslog I can see a message like

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > > > > > I like tanks! ;) > > > > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) > > Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly, > fast, etc. I meant the tank. ;) > Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is too

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 02:12, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > > > I like tanks! ;) > > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly, fast, etc. > > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix w

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > I like tanks! ;) Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way. Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's for like, *lots* of modems." :) > I r

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in > > line! > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) I like tanks! ;) > > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Tony Green
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said: > > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a > > Portslave installation. > > Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow? > Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth from a number of different 'b

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in > line! Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big > enough for Portslave. > > Setting up the RADIUS ser

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > > > > > I like tanks! ;) > > > > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) > > Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly, > fast, etc. I meant the tank. ;) > Well the latest version of Portslave (the one that is to

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 02:12, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > > > I like tanks! ;) > > Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) Why? The latest version is only an 80K deb! It's small, resource friendly, fast, etc. > > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > > I like tanks! ;) Not on my phoneline, thank you. ;) > Sure. AFAIK every RADIUS server in the Unix world supports PAM in some way. Cool. I've never really looked at it, as I've always thought, "oh no, that's for like, *lots* of modems." :) > I

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Russell Coker
On Tue, 9 Oct 2001 01:27, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > > > There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in > > line! > > Is that like sending in the tanks? :) I like tanks! ;) > > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Tony Green
* This one time, at band camp, Jeff Waugh said: > > Setting up the RADIUS server is likely to be the most difficult part of a > > Portslave installation. > > Can I authenticate with PAM, etc. somehow? > Well, RADIUS isn't that hard. A simple radius server can auth from a number of different '

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-08 Thread Jeff Waugh
> There's nothing stopping you from running Portslave with a single dial-in > line! Is that like sending in the tanks? :) > If your dial-in setup is serious enough to use a RADIUS server then it's big > enough for Portslave. > > Setting up the RADIUS ser

Re: Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-06 Thread Russell Coker
On Sat, 6 Oct 2001 11:53, Jeff Waugh wrote: > > Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be > > done better by Portslave. > > Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in > ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite s

Smaller dial-in systems [was: portslave]

2001-10-06 Thread Jeff Waugh
> Anything that can be done by getty, mgetty, radius-client, etc can be done > better by Portslave. Is portslave appropriate for a smaller system, say with only three dial-in ports? mgetty is not exactly the most polite software to administer, and there are lots of times I'd li

Dial-In Server with ONLY ONE USER-ID/PASSOWRD

2001-05-23 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, I have tried since month to get my Dial-In Server running with only one USER-ID and PASSWORD or nothing but without success. I have 8 lines with external ISDN-Modems and I use pppd and mgetty. If I setup regular accounts it works fine but I like to have only one USER-ID/PASSWORD

Dial-In Server with ONLY ONE USER-ID/PASSOWRD

2001-05-23 Thread Michelle Konzack
Hello, I have tried since month to get my Dial-In Server running with only one USER-ID and PASSWORD or nothing but without success. I have 8 lines with external ISDN-Modems and I use pppd and mgetty. If I setup regular accounts it works fine but I like to have only one USER-ID/PASSWORD

Re: dial-in session disconnected while sending large file

2000-10-16 Thread Robert Davidson
That init string should fix that, if thats what the problem is. Regards, Robert Davidson. On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 09:17:45PM +0700, Andika Triwidada wrote: > Hello, > > My machine acted strangely: dial-in users got disconnected while > sending large-sized emails. Troubleshooting is rathe

dial-in session disconnected while sending large file

2000-10-16 Thread Andika Triwidada
Hello, My machine acted strangely: dial-in users got disconnected while sending large-sized emails. Troubleshooting is rather difficult, for I do not have physical access to the server nor capability to test dialin connection myself. (The server is in the other side of Pacific). A quick info

Re: Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Tim
You were probably looking for RADIUS or something. mgetty is for tty handling. I use cistron based radius daemon. Sorry about the confusion, Tim. > The package 'mgetty' does the trick nicely. > > It has a debian package but you can read up on it at: > http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/ > > Tim

Re: Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Tim
The package 'mgetty' does the trick nicely. It has a debian package but you can read up on it at: http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/ Tim. > How do you configure Debian to authenticate an > incoming call. or where to find info on doing this.

Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Bill
Hi all, How do you configure Debian to authenticate an incoming call. or where to find info on doing this. Thanks in advance Bill * The Mind is like a parachute; it works much better when it's open.

Re: Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Tim
You were probably looking for RADIUS or something. mgetty is for tty handling. I use cistron based radius daemon. Sorry about the confusion, Tim. > The package 'mgetty' does the trick nicely. > > It has a debian package but you can read up on it at: > http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/ > > Ti

Re: Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Tim
The package 'mgetty' does the trick nicely. It has a debian package but you can read up on it at: http://alpha.greenie.net/mgetty/ Tim. > How do you configure Debian to authenticate an > incoming call. or where to find info on doing this. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC

Dial in

2000-06-26 Thread Bill
Hi all, How do you configure Debian to authenticate an incoming call. or where to find info on doing this. Thanks in advance Bill * The Mind is like a parachute; it works much better when it's open.