On Friday 10 December 2004 00:39, Mark Bucciarelli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've recently turned on EHLO/HELO validation and am encouraged by how
effective it is. WIth RBL's (spamcop and dnsbl) and SpamAssassin 3, only
88% of spam was stopped. So far, it's 100%. (This is a _very_ small
On Fri, Dec 10, 2004 at 11:08:53PM +1100, Russell Coker wrote:
I tried out reject_unknown_hostname but had to turn it off, too many
machines had unknown hostnames.
For example a zone foo.com has a SMTP server named postfix1 and puts
postfix1.foo.com in the EHLO command but has an external DNS
[CC'ing Bill Taroli who has been helping me with this on courier-user]
On Friday 10 December 2004 07:08, Russell Coker wrote:
On Friday 10 December 2004 00:39, Mark Bucciarelli
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've recently turned on EHLO/HELO validation and am encouraged by how
effective it is.
On Friday 10 December 2004 09:36, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
(1) If SPF HELO checking is on and lookup matches connecting IP
-- PASS
[..]
Otherwise, return 517 HELO $hostname does not match $remote-ip
Sorry to reply to myself, but this sequence is more complicated if SPF
checking is turned on
On Tuesday 07 December 2004 17:55, Michael Loftis wrote:
--On Wednesday, December 08, 2004 08:47 +1100 Craig Sanders
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I reject by 554 code... should I change to 4xx?
if it suits your needs. i wouldn't.
I have to agree with that statement. For us it suits
5 matches
Mail list logo
