Re: Idle Time (ssh, or telnet)

2000-02-17 Thread Nick Jennings
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 08:34:52PM -0600, Security wrote: I believe that the /sbin/ipfwadm -M -s 10 10 10 is the pertinent line. Note: this machine is a 2.0.37 kernel on Debian 2.1. I am not sure of the equivalent ipchains incantation. Maybe someone else on the list can toss

Re: Idle Time (ssh, or telnet)

2000-02-17 Thread Nathan
: Wednesday, February 16, 2000 7:12 PM Subject: Re: Idle Time (ssh, or telnet) On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 08:34:52PM -0600, Security wrote: I believe that the /sbin/ipfwadm -M -s 10 10 10 is the pertinent line. Note: this machine is a 2.0.37 kernel on Debian 2.1. I am not sure

Re: Idle Time (ssh, or telnet)

2000-02-15 Thread Security
That sounds very possible, the network at home is masqueraded by a little 486 router I have setup, (ipchains). and the workstation at work has a real IP. It'd be great if you could dig out that info and let me know. Nick; Here is my /etc/ppp/ip-up.d/00ipmasq which I use on my ppp

Re: Idle Time (ssh, or telnet)

2000-02-14 Thread Nick Jennings
On Sat, Feb 12, 2000 at 08:33:24AM -0600, Security wrote: Are you using masquerading somewhere in the route for the box that drops the connections? If so that could be the cause. I disremember the details but I had this for awhile and that was fixed by tweaking the the ipmasq (or chains)