Hello Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana [EMAIL PROTECTED],
What software did you use to make the load-balancing?
Does PostgreSQL support async replication only just like MySQL does? How
about Sync replication?
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 02:35:17 +0100
Raúl Alexis Betancort Santana [EMAIL PROTECTED]
i totally agree. I used postgres in prod in several cases and it never
fall, got stucked or anything. Especially if you need transaction, i think
postgres is the way to go.., otherwise, text files is a very solid approach
;)
JeF
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 07:20:02PM +1200, Dave Watkins wrote:
Hi
Hello Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I have no problem with the robustness of PostgresSQL.
However, does PostgreSQL have built-in replication? If not, how do I
implement high-available PostgreSQL clusters?
In addition, since InnoDB has been stable in MySQL-3.23.49, is InnoDB
ready for
El Thu, Apr 04, 2002 at 08:58:50AM +0800, Patrick Hsieh escribió:
Hello Jean-Francois Dive [EMAIL PROTECTED],
I have no problem with the robustness of PostgresSQL.
However, does PostgreSQL have built-in replication? If not, how do I
implement high-available PostgreSQL clusters?
Umm,
Hello,
I am planing to have some woody with mysql-server running on a
mission-critical environment. My criteria is:
1. HA requirement:
By using mysql built-in replication, I'd like to have a load-balancing
and fail-over mysql clusters
2. minimal data loss risk
How much can mysql 3.2x
Hi Patrick
MySQL replication is only one way in 3.2x so all writes have to be sent to
the master server, but the reads can be done from the slaves. If you loose
a slave then no big deal round robin DNS alone should take care of that
with very little impact, but if you loose the master then
6 matches
Mail list logo
