On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote:
Hi,
what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the
mail queue? Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that
seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning
back to 30
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson
What are other people doing?
sticking to RFCs. O:-)
i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes
on weekend.
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, Day of the
Hi,
what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the
mail queue? Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that
seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning
back to 30 minutes and the delivery failure back to 12 hours. My logic
is that
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 at 15:12:55 +1100, Lauchlin Wilkinson wrote:
Hi,
what are peoples thoughts on the length of time mail should sit in the
mail queue? Due to the rise in the amount of spam and viruses that
seems to be going around lately I throttled back the delivery warning
back to 30
Thursday 23 October 2003 06:12, Lauchlin Wilkinson
What are other people doing?
sticking to RFCs. O:-)
i would not lower it under 3daysjust in case the remote mail server brakes
on weekend.
--
Only a fool fights in a burning house.
-- Kank the Klingon, Day of the
5 matches
Mail list logo