On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 02:42:03PM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
> I don't recall if I have seen anything on this list regarding the issue of
> scanning messages for viruses as they are processed by a Linux-based mail
> server. If there is such a package, where can I find information on this
> such as t
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 02:42:03PM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
> I don't recall if I have seen anything on this list regarding the issue of
> scanning messages for viruses as they are processed by a Linux-based mail
> server. If there is such a package, where can I find information on this
> such as
." Agent Smith - The Matrix
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian ISP Mailing List"
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Mail Server Virus Protection
> Another scanner (which I haven't trie
." Agent Smith - The Matrix
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian ISP Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, October 07, 2001 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: Mail Server Virus Protection
> Another scanner (which
Another scanner (which I haven't tried yet) is exiscan:
http://duncanthrax.net/exiscan/ says:
... works together with the Exim MTA designed to be very easy to
implement. Exiscan supports multithreaded unpacking and scanning of
mail, with a configurable number of processes. Exiscan ha
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 10:49:45PM +0200, Stojan Rancic wrote:
>
> > Yeah, only it crashes on larger mails and fills up whole disk with some
> > binary crap instead of report :->
>
> What do you consider "larger mails" ?
Anything that exceeds half of ulimit. (Even less in case of larger
mails).
> Yeah, only it crashes on larger mails and fills up whole disk with some
> binary crap instead of report :->
What do you consider "larger mails" ? I remember getting up to 10M mails
scanned and delivered to my mailbox as Sircam-infected..
> Installer doesn't even run, you need to install it m
On Sat, Oct 06, 2001 at 10:31:56PM +0200, Stojan Rancic wrote:
>
> >> Thanks for any assistance you can provide.
>
> > Don't use AVP. It's a piece of crap.
>
> Actually, AVP with avcheck seem to work splendidly here, in
> combination with Postfix, scanning quite a number of mails every day
> an
>> Thanks for any assistance you can provide.
> Don't use AVP. It's a piece of crap.
Actually, AVP with avcheck seem to work splendidly here, in
combination with Postfix, scanning quite a number of mails every day
and blocking the plague of Win32 viruses..
On Sat, Oct 13, 2001 at 02:42:03PM -0400, Gene Grimm wrote:
> I don't recall if I have seen anything on this list regarding the issue of
> scanning messages for viruses as they are processed by a Linux-based mail
> server. If there is such a package, where can I find information on this
> such as
I don't recall if I have seen anything on this list regarding the issue of
scanning messages for viruses as they are processed by a Linux-based mail
server. If there is such a package, where can I find information on this
such as the format for mail storage and configuration? Thanks for any
assist
11 matches
Mail list logo
