Re: NAT problems

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:31:42AM +0100, Tobias Geijersson wrote: > My firewall have these NICs: > > eth0 192.168.2.254/24 is connected to my IP-provider using private ip > eth1 a.x.y.z1/27 is connected to my server segment using "real" ip > eth2 a.x.y.z2/27 is connected to my workstation segment

Re: NAT problems

Tobias Geijersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is that when I add the rule for masqurading it translates > all 192.168.10.1/24 to eth0's 192.168.2.254 before routed to my ip > provider, and that adress is a private one and will not work! > > How do I solve this in kernel 2.2? I'm no

NAT problems

Hello, I've got a problem with my network setup that I can't solve. It looks like IP tables in kernel 2.4 solves it but I dont have the time (and courage) to do that right now. My firewall have these NICs: eth0 192.168.2.254/24 is connected to my IP-provider using private ip eth1 a.x.y.z1/27 is

Re: NAT problems

On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:31:42AM +0100, Tobias Geijersson wrote: > My firewall have these NICs: > > eth0 192.168.2.254/24 is connected to my IP-provider using private ip > eth1 a.x.y.z1/27 is connected to my server segment using "real" ip > eth2 a.x.y.z2/27 is connected to my workstation segmen

Re: NAT problems

Tobias Geijersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The problem is that when I add the rule for masqurading it translates > all 192.168.10.1/24 to eth0's 192.168.2.254 before routed to my ip > provider, and that adress is a private one and will not work! > > How do I solve this in kernel 2.2? I'm n

NAT problems

Hello, I've got a problem with my network setup that I can't solve. It looks like IP tables in kernel 2.4 solves it but I dont have the time (and courage) to do that right now. My firewall have these NICs: eth0 192.168.2.254/24 is connected to my IP-provider using private ip eth1 a.x.y.z1/27 i