+ Gene Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24.07.02 21:28]:
> I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
> packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
> linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
> I am looking a
+ Gene Grimm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [24.07.02 21:28]:
> I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
> packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
> linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
> I am looking
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:11, Gene Grimm wrote:
> I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
> packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
> linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
> I am looking at up
I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
I am looking at upgrading to the 2.4.18 kernel but this tells me I have t
On Wed, 2002-07-24 at 20:11, Gene Grimm wrote:
> I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
> packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
> linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
> I am looking at u
I just updated the packages on my Potato-based server after the Woody-based
packages became stable over the weekend. The upgrade reported a possible
linking problem with the 2.2.17 kernel that the server is currently running.
I am looking at upgrading to the 2.4.18 kernel but this tells me I have
6 matches
Mail list logo
