have a look at zmailer also! if you are limited to choose between the
three you quoted, then postfix is the answer. reasons in other posts
of this thread...
--
.''`. martin f. krafft [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: :' :proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 11:37:58PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
nope, because postfix has no way of knowing that they were
originally the same email(*). postfix has been handed 10 individual
emails by qmail, so it will deliver 10 individual emails.
Mmm... but, for example, if it scanned it's
On Tue, Nov 26, 2002 at 12:00:32AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
Actually, I can't see how Postfix would be at all faster, since it
would still be sending individual emails on separate connections. In
fact, wouldn't it be slower, since Qmail was optimized specifically
for this?
nope
recently there was a patch floating on the qmail list that patches
the way qmail-send runs. The result is having two processes instead,
and one performance bottleneck within qmail-send removed. I don't
recall the details, but the purported increase in performance
should be at least a factor
Jason Lim writes:
recently there was a patch floating on the qmail list that patches
the way qmail-send runs. The result is having two processes instead,
and one performance bottleneck within qmail-send removed. I don't
recall the details, but the purported increase in performance
should
that they were
originally the same email(*). postfix has been handed 10 individual
emails by qmail, so it will deliver 10 individual emails.
Mmm... but, for example, if it scanned it's queue every 30 seconds,
for example, it could then combine them together?
nope.
For example
Sendmail, but then how does Postfix operate (similar/hybrid)? It hear
Postfix does something fancy in that regard that is a mix or something,
but since I'm no Postfix expert, perhaps someone knows more about this?
The reason I ask is that we have a number of Qmail servers right now
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 01:00:51PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
I don't want to spark a flame war or anything... but for purely
outgoing mailing (sending emails), which mail package would be
fastest?
if you're using VERP (Variable Envelope Return Path), postfix is a
little faster than qmail
-domain problem.
if qmail relays individual messages via a postfix box, then the postfix
box will have individual messages in it's queue - it can't recombine
them into one message. i.e. the damage has already been done.
I don't quite understand that part about the damage already being done
On Mon, Nov 25, 2002 at 03:01:29PM +1100, Jason Lim wrote:
however, it won't solve the multiple-recipients-at-one-domain
problem. if qmail relays individual messages via a postfix box,
then the postfix box will have individual messages in it's queue -
it can't recombine them into one
Hi
I wonder if there an understandble howto that I can use for installing QMAIL
+ MYSQL + VPOPMAIL (with MYSQL accounts) + COURIER-IMAP + SQUIRRELMAIL +
Clam AntiVirus on my server using deb pacakges.
Regards
Itamar
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
Hi
I wonder if there an understandble howto that I can use for installing QMAIL
+ MYSQL + VPOPMAIL (with MYSQL accounts) + COURIER-IMAP + SQUIRRELMAIL +
Clam AntiVirus on my server using deb pacakges.
Regards
Itamar
Does anyone know of a qmail to postfix transition doc? Or, has anyone
done this who is willing to write such a doc?
I've been running qmail for a few years now and I find that while it
works well, it's difficult to keep up with updates, etc. It seems
postfix is more bulletproof now than
Does anyone know of a qmail to postfix transition doc? Or, has anyone
done this who is willing to write such a doc?
I've been running qmail for a few years now and I find that while it
works well, it's difficult to keep up with updates, etc. It seems
postfix is more bulletproof now than
Hello!
Several times people have asked for help when setting up Spamassassin
with Qmail, so I put a (very small) document together, which describes
how to do it.
It is not about Qmail, neither about Spamassassin, just how to get the
two working together painlessly.
If you have done it yourself
Hello!
El dom, 30-06-2002 a las 02:25, Dave Watkins escribió:
Hi All
I've been trying to get Spamassassin working with Qmail for a few days with
no luck. All I want it to do it tag the messages as spam so they can be
Have done that with no problems.
filtered by the email clients easily
Hi All
I've been trying to get Spamassassin working with Qmail for a few days with
no luck. All I want it to do it tag the messages as spam so they can be
filtered by the email clients easily. I've applied the qmail-queue patch
and set the qmailqueue variable to point to the script I want
Hi All
I've been trying to get Spamassassin working with Qmail for a few days with
no luck. All I want it to do it tag the messages as spam so they can be
filtered by the email clients easily. I've applied the qmail-queue patch
and set the qmailqueue variable to point to the script I want
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
I built vpopmail and sqwebmail successfully now. I did not use the
Debian source packages any longer but the more current versions from
www.inter7.com - as some of you suggested. And now the combination of
qmail, vpopmail
Hi Theodor et al.!
First of all: Thanks for all the mails and hints!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
Just what I use down
On Mon, Jun 24, 2002 at 09:53:49PM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
I built vpopmail and sqwebmail successfully now. I did not use the
Debian source packages any longer but the more current versions from
www.inter7.com - as some of you suggested. And now the combination of
qmail, vpopmail
I'm in the process of building debian/woody packages containing the most
recent versions of vpopmail and vpopmail-enabled courier. Unfortunately
it may take a few extra weeks since I'm involved in many other projects.
I'll keep you informed just in case ;-)
Best regards,
I thought Sanjay
Hello,
Phpgroupware does look intersting.
Quoting Alejandro Borges [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Kayive a phpgroupware that does this very well with a little
tweaking on phpgw's email client (the default wont do)
documented tweaking ?
Best
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
El dom, 23-06-2002 a las 05:04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
Hello,
Phpgroupware does look intersting.
Glad you think so!
documented tweaking ?
Glad you asked...:-\..
Um no, docs are pretty limited for deployment (but abundant for end
users).assisted tweaking in #phpgroupware and
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
qmail is installed and works fine. I tried to implement vpopmail
qmail is installed and works fine. I tried to implement vpopmail and
sqwebmail, but I was not able to get it to work. The sqwebmail debian
package does not come with vpopmail authentification included. My
attempts to build it from the source package with modified rules file
all failed
Hi,
Please take a look at Bill's toaster at http://shupp.org/toaster/.
It contains all the things you want, and more:
- Qmail SMTP Mail Server with SMTP-AUTH (Plain, CRAM-MD5), TLS (SSL) support, and
optional Virus Scanner.
- POP3 Server with APOP and SSL support
- IMAP Server with TLS (SSL
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:21:41AM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
Hi Theodor!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
Just what I use down here on the farm ;-)
Good to hear!
qmail
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
cut
I installed vpopmail binary package from unstable (it is not included in
woody).
dpkg --list *vpopmail*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
|
Hi Theodor et al.!
I installed vpopmail binary package from unstable (it is not included in
woody).
dpkg --list *vpopmail*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems
solution check www.phpgroupware.org
El vie, 21-06-2002 a las 02:21, Dieter Heiliger escribió:
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
I currently run 2 systems with qmail/vpopmail/courier-imap and squirrelmail.
The only thing installed from source is vpopmail and courier-imap (no
working .deb's) but the default squirrelmail works just fine. The user
just has to enter the entire email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a username
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
qmail is installed and works fine. I tried to implement vpopmail
qmail is installed and works fine. I tried to implement vpopmail and
sqwebmail, but I was not able to get it to work. The sqwebmail debian
package does not come with vpopmail authentification included. My
attempts to build it from the source package with modified rules file
all failed
Hi,
Please take a look at Bill's toaster at http://shupp.org/toaster/.
It contains all the things you want, and more:
- Qmail SMTP Mail Server with SMTP-AUTH (Plain, CRAM-MD5), TLS (SSL) support,
and optional Virus Scanner.
- POP3 Server with APOP and SSL support
- IMAP Server with TLS (SSL
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 10:21:41AM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
Hi Theodor!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
- virtual pop3 users
- webmail access
Just what I use down here on the farm ;-)
Good to hear!
qmail is installed
On Fri, Jun 21, 2002 at 11:36:05AM +0200, Dieter Heiliger wrote:
cut
I installed vpopmail binary package from unstable (it is not included in
woody).
dpkg --list *vpopmail*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
Hi Theodor et al.!
I installed vpopmail binary package from unstable (it is not included in
woody).
dpkg --list *vpopmail*
Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold
| Status=Not/Installed/Config-files/Unpacked/Failed-config/Half-installed
|/ Err?=(none)/Hold/Reinst-required/X=both-problems
solution check www.phpgroupware.org
El vie, 21-06-2002 a las 02:21, Dieter Heiliger escribió:
Hi Gurus!
I am trying to set up a mail toaster on a Debian Woody system.
Here are the requirements:
- qmail
- pop3
- pop3 authentification _not_ against /etc/passwd, /etc/shadow
I currently run 2 systems with qmail/vpopmail/courier-imap and squirrelmail.
The only thing installed from source is vpopmail and courier-imap (no
working .deb's) but the default squirrelmail works just fine. The user
just has to enter the entire email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a username
Hi list.
I have a Qmail vpopmail system running on Debian/unstable with no problems.
I have both real and virtual users on the system.
For a couple of days I have tried to teach my Courier-IMAP to authenticate viritual
accounts with no luck.
It seems to me that the Coruier-IMAP .deb
, turn off auth-daemon (as mentioned on the vpopmail mailing
list). I don't use local users so I haven't had to worry about that and
only list authvchkpw as the only auth module used.
Hope this helps.
At 10:31 AM 5/16/2002 , Christofer Algotsson wrote:
Hi list.
I have a Qmail
List Gurus,
I am running QMAIL for my work and the boffins above me have decided
to start using Exchange Server for the corporate email. They like the
extra functionality. Anyway, the username convention is changing
from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am being slack
List Gurus,
I am running QMAIL for my work and the boffins above me have decided
to start using Exchange Server for the corporate email. They like the
extra functionality. Anyway, the username convention is changing
from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] to[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am being slack
Hi All
I've just setup qmail to run over stunnel for POP on port 995. Below is the
command I use to run it
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -DRHv -l
0 0 995 /usr/sbin/stunnel -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup domain name
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail
Hi All
I've just setup qmail to run over stunnel for POP on port 995. Below is the
command I use to run it
#!/bin/sh
exec /usr/local/bin/softlimit -m 300 /usr/local/bin/tcpserver -DRHv -l
0 0 995 /usr/sbin/stunnel -l /var/qmail/bin/qmail-popup domain name
/bin/checkpassword /var/qmail/bin
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
servers?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 07:43, Gene Grimm wrote:
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
servers?
If I understand
]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Distributed Qmail Configuration
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 07:43, Gene Grimm wrote:
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
servers?
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 07:43, Gene Grimm wrote:
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
servers?
If I understand
@lists.debian.org
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:40 PM
Subject: Re: Distributed Qmail Configuration
On Thu, 2001-12-13 at 07:43, Gene Grimm wrote:
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
On Thu, Dec 13, 2001 at 07:43:19AM -0500, Gene Grimm wrote:
Is there any information available anywhere about configuring Qmail for
distributed mail delivery with one Qmail system receiving as the Mail
eXchanger and relaying selective domains to specified remote Qmail POP
servers?
Here's my
Hello,
I've Debian 2.2 r3 on my servers and I use sendmail, but I want to
try "qmail"! I've been on "http://www.qmail.org" and the ".deb" link
in the "top.html" page leads me to "top.html#200101270" instead of the
file ".deb".
Q.: is
Thus spake Pedro Braga, on Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 06:10:16PM +0100:
Hello,
I've Debian 2.2 r3 on my servers and I use sendmail, but I want to try
qmail! I've been on http://www.qmail.org; and the .deb link in the
top.html page leads me to top.html#200101270 instead of the file
.deb.
Q
On qmail-systems you should use ezmlm.
Otherwise take a look at Mailman (http://www.list.org)
Martin
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote:
Our mail environment runs several virtual domains on qmail+vpopmail. Now I
need to setup mailing lists for a few of these domains.
Any
Our mail environment runs several virtual domains on qmail+vpopmail. Now I
need to setup mailing lists for a few of these domains.
Any suggestions on what software to use?
Web-management interface would certainly be nice feature.
--
Juha-Matti Tapio, Atk-suunnittelija, puh. 050-5419230
Kirahvi
On qmail-systems you should use ezmlm.
Otherwise take a look at Mailman (http://www.list.org)
Martin
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Juha-Matti Tapio wrote:
Our mail environment runs several virtual domains on qmail+vpopmail. Now I
need to setup mailing lists for a few of these domains.
Any
Try subscribing to the qmail mailing list at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They get heaps of mail, but someone should be able to help you there or point you in
the right direction.
Some other links you could try is:
http://www.qmail.org/
http://cr.yp.to/qmail.html
Cheers
Rob
-Original
/etc/qmail/rcpthosts
man qmail-smtpd
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Alex Borges wrote:
Mhm cant seem to find a file for allowed relay-from hosts on qmail such
as the one in sendmail i need (as everybody) to deny relaying from
everywhere but a well defined set of
ip's.
Please
Mhm cant seem to find a file for allowed relay-from hosts on qmail such
as the one in sendmail i need (as everybody) to deny relaying from
everywhere but a well defined set of
ip's.
Please, pretttyplease, prettypleasewithacherryontop help me!
Alex
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
Hi Guys !
I'm looking for install Qmail, but i don't understand How to ...
Could someone help me pleaze ?
Florian
-Message d'origine-
De : jens-ingo brodesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Envoyé : mardi 3 juillet 2001 12:50
À : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Mysqld dying together
The best qmail reference I ever found was http://www.lifewithqmail.com.
To install qmail on debian you should apt-get install qmail-src. Then run
build-qmail (or something close to that, apt will tell you what to do).
The build-qmail script adds the qmail users and groups and also builds
qmail
Hi Guys !
I'm looking for install Qmail, but i don't understand How to ...
Could someone help me pleaze ?
Florian
-Message d'origine-
De : jens-ingo brodesser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : mardi 3 juillet 2001 12:50
À : debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Objet : Mysqld dying together
The best qmail reference I ever found was http://www.lifewithqmail.com.
To install qmail on debian you should apt-get install qmail-src. Then run
build-qmail (or something close to that, apt will tell you what to do).
The build-qmail script adds the qmail users and groups and also builds
qmail
Currently I am having a problem with qmail.
Our users are getting the following error when sending mail via
SMTP:
"No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient"
The client they are using is Microsoft
Outlook. I can send via Outlook express, and it works
Outlook ignores the SMTP spec by not enclosing the e-mail addresses in angle
brackets (although microsoft blames older mail server systems):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=gnFR=0
Djb did a workaround for this (stupid RFC ignorant clients) on qmail
Currently I am having a problem with qmail.
Our users are getting the following error when sending mail via
SMTP:
"No transport provider was available for delivery to this recipient"
The client they are using is Microsoft
Outlook. I can send via Outlook express, and it works
Outlook ignores the SMTP spec by not enclosing the e-mail addresses in angle
brackets (although microsoft blames older mail server systems):
http://support.microsoft.com/support/kb/articles/Q197/4/17.ASP?LN=EN-USSD=gnFR=0
Djb did a workaround for this (stupid RFC ignorant clients) on qmail
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 at 13:25:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
files. Doing ls now is far speedier.
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up just a little bit
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
/bin/ls | wc has taken 1 (one) second. ls | wc lasted 3 minutes and 26
seconds. Yes, near 3 and a half minutes!
This is because ls with additional information (e.g. file type, which is
needed to colour a listing) needs more
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001 at 13:25:17 +1000, Craig Sanders wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
files. Doing ls now is far speedier.
And on an Ultra-60 running Solaris 7 w/UFS:
bash-2.04$ time /bin/ls | wc
63975 63975 1971245
real0m2.213s
user0m1.160s
sys 0m0.890s
bash-2.04$ time ls | wc
63975 63975 1971253
real2m19.965s
user0m1.490s
sys 0m16.340s
bash-2.04$
Sped it up just a little bit
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 04:03:11PM +0200, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
/bin/ls | wc has taken 1 (one) second. ls | wc lasted 3 minutes and 26
seconds. Yes, near 3 and a half minutes!
This is because ls with additional information (e.g. file type, which is
needed to colour a listing) needs more time
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
files. Doing ls now is far speedier.
I couldn't find any documentation anywhere stating this, so I'll
server
had a HUGE number of emails, and even just doing ls in each directory in
the qmail queue directories would take ages, as there were so many
individual emails queued.
SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20 something
afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred
On Thu, Jun 21, 2001 at 01:45:23AM +0800, Jason Lim wrote:
SO... by increasing conf-split to 97 (from the default of 20
something afaik), each directory ends up only having a hundred or so
files. Doing ls now is far speedier.
I couldn't find any documentation anywhere stating this, so I'll
Hi,
I am managing two severs with Debian woody
distribution.
and I am in a trouble with qmail's pop daemon.
I'm using following command to start qmail's pop3 daemon. (in
/etc/init.d/qmail)
sh -c
"start-stop-d
Hello!
I am going to install a web mail reading system. It has to:
- support qmail with virtualdomains
- have a look that would be reasonably easy to customize
- be written in a way that isn't a nightmare to
understand/modify
- be secure (well, you can't really prove that, but the code
SQWebMail.
It's fast (written in C), supports qmail very well, and the HTML is
separate (templated) from the code, so it's easy to customize.
http://www.inter7.com
Eric
Hello!
I am going to install a web mail reading system. It has to:
- support qmail with virtualdomains
- have a look
On Wed, Dec 06, 2000 at 06:26:50PM +0100, Guido Bozzetto wrote:
Qmail is, by default, sending double-bounces to postmaster@server if the
email-address at @server is incorrect and the mail from address is invalid.
Is there any way to disable double bounces for certain domains
Hello list!
Qmail is, by default, sending double-bounces to postmaster@server if the email-address
at @server is incorrect and the mail from address is invalid.
Is there any way to disable double bounces for certain domains?
Yours,
Christofer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if you
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 12:10:30PM -0600, Art Sackett wrote:
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if you
existing mail-transport-agent being
on the system will cause dpkg to bail out thinking qmail causes a
conflict. So after yanking out the default exim, you have to go back
and reinstall any you need of at, mailx, logrotate, and mail readers.
There may be others, which will be installation dependent
still a niggling
little problem where any other existing mail-transport-agent being
on the system will cause dpkg to bail out thinking qmail causes a
conflict. So after yanking out the default exim, you have to go back
and reinstall any you need of at, mailx, logrotate, and mail readers
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if you remove
exim, those things that depend upon mail-transport-agent will
still a niggling
little problem where any other existing mail-transport-agent being
on the system will cause dpkg to bail out thinking qmail causes a
conflict. So after yanking out the default exim, you have to go back
and reinstall any you need of at, mailx, logrotate, and mail readers
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:19:48AM -0500, Nathan E Norman wrote:
Huh? Why would you need to deinstall at, mailx, logrotate and mail
readers in the first place?
Well, you wouldn't *need* to, strictly speaking, but if you remove
exim, those things that depend upon mail-transport-agent will
umm, vpopmail first. I installed the latest version from source, and
it was seamless. I did not use a debian package to install it.
As for qmail, I attempted an install of qmail from dselect, and I had
nothing but problems. After several days of pulling my hair out, I
opted to download
Hi, just a quick email to find out.
1. is the vchkpw/vpopmial package still being maintained under Debian,
doesn't look like it as vchkpw is several versions behind what is on the
inter7 site.
2. is there still a qmail list for Debian that anyone knows about.
etc
Have been using exim
umm, vpopmail first. I installed the latest version from source, and
it was seamless. I did not use a debian package to install it.
As for qmail, I attempted an install of qmail from dselect, and I had
nothing but problems. After several days of pulling my hair out, I
opted to download
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
| Just wanted to know if there was a Debian way of installing qmail for a
| large ISP environment :) I haven´t seemed to found any info on
| partitioning recomendations, and such and such... Any ideas ?
|
| The lack of answers might be due to a IMHO
On Thu, Aug 03, 2000 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Neil D. Roberts wrote:
Hi !
Just wanted to know if there was a Debian way of installing qmail for a
large ISP environment :) I haven´t seemed to found any info on
partitioning recomendations, and such and such... Any ideas ?
The lack of answers
On Fri, 4 Aug 2000, Florian Lohoff wrote:
| Just wanted to know if there was a Debian way of installing qmail for a
| large ISP environment :) I haven´t seemed to found any info on
| partitioning recomendations, and such and such... Any ideas ?
|
| The lack of answers might be due to a IMHO
Hi !
Just wanted to know if there was a Debian way of installing qmail for a
large ISP environment :) I haven´t seemed to found any info on
partitioning recomendations, and such and such... Any ideas ?
Thanks, Neil
IMHO it is not a wise idea to use alias as a normal user due to the fact
that it is a special user in the qmail architecture:
Mail to addresses on local domains that don't in fact exist, are delivered
via ~alias/.qmail-localpart where localpart@domain_in_locals is the
recipient of the mail
201 - 300 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
