Re: Webmail configuration for schools

2003-07-01 Thread Alex Borges
El mar, 01 de 07 de 2003 a las 07:35, Ross, Chris escribió: > I need to provide email access for 13,000 to 14,000 K12 > students. Last school year we used Microsoft > Exchange BY GOD, did he really say that? > >with extremely > 1. Postfix with either mysql or LDAP for virtual user del

Re: Webmail configuration for schools

2003-07-01 Thread Alex Borges
El mar, 01 de 07 de 2003 a las 07:35, Ross, Chris escribió: > I need to provide email access for 13,000 to 14,000 K12 > students. Last school year we used Microsoft > Exchange BY GOD, did he really say that? > >with extremely > 1. Postfix with either mysql or LDAP for virtual user del

Re: webmail

2003-02-19 Thread Russell Coker
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:09, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Rod Rodolico wrote: > > I am using SquirrelMail to provide web based e-mail for my clients. I > > used to use NeoMail and have investigated phpGroupWare. SquirrelMail also > > has a (currently broken) nice c

Re: webmail

2003-02-19 Thread Ola Lundqvist
On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Rod Rodolico wrote: > I am using SquirrelMail to provide web based e-mail for my clients. I used > to use NeoMail and have investigated phpGroupWare. SquirrelMail also has a > (currently broken) nice calendar and some other add-in modules which is > nice. >

Re: webmail

2003-02-18 Thread Dustin Douglas
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003 14:34:26 -0600 (CST) "Rod Rodolico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am using SquirrelMail to provide web based e-mail for my clients. > I used to use NeoMail and have investigated phpGroupWare. > SquirrelMail also has a(currently broken) nice calendar and some > other add-in mod

Re: webmail

2002-06-19 Thread Bill Lumsden
Neomail is quite good as a web interface for email. Send, Receive and import address book from csv. http://neomail.sourceforge.net/ Works well with debian. Bill Lumsden Widebay Internet http://widebay.net.au -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Tro

Re: webmail

2002-06-19 Thread Craig Sanders
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:09:44PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > What's a good webmail system to use? courier's sqwebmail is not too bad. reasonably fast, quite configurable. it goes direct to each user's Maildir/ spool. this could be good or it could be bad, depending on your setup. i don't t

Re: webmail

2002-06-19 Thread Michael R. Schwarzbach
Hi Russell, I've tested all webmailers, I've heard of. 90% are total crap. As others already said, there are only a few useable webmailer. I would recommmend squirrelmail, because it has some (at least for me) important features, the others haven't: - search all subfolders for new mails (very imp

Re: webmail

2002-06-17 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
I have a list and some notes of web-based email clients at http://www.reedmedia.net/misc/mail/web-based.html (That reminds me ... I have a six pages of notes from testing six of them around here somewhere.) Jeremy C. Reed echo '9,J8HD,[EMAIL PROTECTED]:[EMAIL PROTECTED];[EMAIL PROTECTED]@5GBIE

Re: webmail

2002-06-17 Thread bolivier
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gerard MacNeil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Debian ISP" Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 1:49 AM Subject: Re: webmail > On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:41, Gerard MacNeil wrote: > > > What's a good webmail system to use? > > > >

Re: webmail

2002-06-17 Thread Robert Waldner
On Sun, 16 Jun 2002 23:09:44 +0200, Russell Coker writes: >What's a good webmail system to use? squirrelmail has proved the least painful (they _all_ are) for me. >There are several in Debian, I've had experience with IMP, but that >experience has been mostly painful. Upgrading it is always di

Re: webmail

2002-06-17 Thread Garry Byrne
At 11:09 PM 16/06/02 +0200, Russell Coker wrote: >What's a good webmail system to use? We have used sqwebmail for well over a year now with no problems. I use the web interface myself when I am travelling of on a slow modem connection and it does everything I need. Russell, if you would like me

RE: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Mario Zuppini
I have tried more than at least 40 webmails in the search of something that is visually pleasing / user friendly / hassle free and is very portable in the event of changing systems, and it all came down to OpenWebMail. Before you settle on a webmail to use, give it a go. -Original Message

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread tps
On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11:09:44PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote: > What's a good webmail system to use? > > There are several in Debian, I've had experience with IMP, but that > experience has been mostly painful. Upgrading it is always difficult, and > the packages insist on Postgresql even thou

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Russell Coker
On Mon, 17 Jun 2002 00:41, Gerard MacNeil wrote: > > What's a good webmail system to use? > > I have tried "most" Debianized Webmail package combinations. For "only > email" and throwing in calendaring support, you are describing the > sqwebmail with courier-pcp (Personal Calendaring Protocol). T

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread David Bishop
I'd also recommend squirrelmail, as I tried using imho and it was very crashy, I've also had painful experiences with imp, and none of the other ones seemed as nice. squirrelmail "just works", with any given imap server you have. Good luck, and have fun! D.A.Bishop On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 11

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Andrew Tait
I hate been using Cyclonic webmail www.greyguy.com.au for several months now (not a debian package). It connects to the pop3 server so it doesn't matter what your system setup is (mbox, maildir, etc). The logon screen doesn't give ANY error messages if your login fails, and there's a few other li

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Gerard MacNeil
On Sun, 2002-06-16 at 18:09, Russell Coker wrote: > What's a good webmail system to use? > > There are several in Debian, I've had experience with IMP, but that > experience has been mostly painful. Upgrading it is always difficult, and > the packages insist on Postgresql even though it's not n

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Jun 17, Christian Hammers wrote: > > Wow, great work! > Useful would also be remarks about > * how fast it is (does it "feel" sluggish?) > * how good it deals with *big* multipart mime mails (people like to >send 50MB Excel sheets via mail. Crashes some of those systems.. > * activeness

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Christian Hammers
Hello On Sun, Jun 16, 2002 at 10:22:39PM +0100, Alexander Clouter wrote: > not all of them are debianized however recently in preparation of a big > service server I'm setting up soon I looked into webmail stuff and trawled > through *every* one on freshmeat :) Wow, great work! Useful would al

Re: webmail

2002-06-16 Thread Alexander Clouter
On Jun 16, Russell Coker wrote: > > What's a good webmail system to use? > > [snipped] > not all of them are debianized however recently in preparation of a big service server I'm setting up soon I looked into webmail stuff and trawled through *every* one on freshmeat :) heres the list (well

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-10 Thread Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Try twig http://twig.screwdriver.net/ Yours Tony. /* * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the * same level of thinking we were at when we created them." * --Albert Einstein *

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-10 Thread Anthony J. Breeds-Taurima
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Try twig http://twig.screwdriver.net/ Yours Tony. /* * "The significant problems we face cannot be solved at the * same level of thinking we were at when we created them." * --Albert Einstein

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-10 Thread Theodore Knab
> > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Just remember there is both IMAP and POP. With webmail this is important. IMAP is more efficient than POP. With IMAP, the webmail client will grap the mail headers first. When users click on the mail to view, the webmail client will send a

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-10 Thread Theodore Knab
> > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Just remember there is both IMAP and POP. With webmail this is important. IMAP is more efficient than POP. With IMAP, the webmail client will grap the mail headers first. When users click on the mail to view, the webmail client will send a

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread rudi
Hi, We are very happy using openwebmail Cheers. Rudi. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: Re: webmail for debian > Hi, > > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > > does an

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread rudi
Hi, We are very happy using openwebmail Cheers. Rudi. - Original Message - From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:09 AM Subject: Re: webmail for debian > Hi, > > Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTE

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread daniel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:52:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? > > Thanks > > Josep > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I lately have been using s

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread daniel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:52:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? > > Thanks > > Josep > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > I lately have been using

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread ragnar
Hi, Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Yes, And for the all important, What is the best one? I do not know. We have used IMP 2.x for more than a year and has worked well. We use it with postgres and set it for IMAP to only one domain / mail server.

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Bodó
Try IMP http://www.horde.org/ zs > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 2002. február 8. 14:52 > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org > Subject: webmail for debian > > > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? > > Thanks > > Josep > > >

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
I've been using Silkymail from http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail. It's a modified version of IMP that has a very smooth user interface (it's very similar to the Mulberry email client, which I also use and like very much). Installation is either a (relative) breeze or a nightmare. It's a breeze

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Erik Wenzel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:52:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Try apt-get install nocc on sid/woody. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Robert Waldner
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 10:52:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Any hint about the fix for squirrel? dpkg -i squirrelmail-package vi /var/lib/dpkg/status change the dependency from "perl-base" to "perl" or "perl-5.005" (or the other way around, can't remember) apt-get install squirrelmail cheer

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Craigsc
Try horde / imp ..Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:52 PM To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org Subject: webmail for debian does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Thanks Josep -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Robert Waldner
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:52:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >does anybody know some webmail system for debian? squirrelmail (from unstable, but getting it to work on a stable box is a one-line - fix) works pretty well here. cheers, &rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTec

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread ragnar
Hi, Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Yes, And for the all important, What is the best one? I do not know. We have used IMP 2.x for more than a year and has worked well. We use it with postgres and set it for IMAP to only one domain / mail server

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Bodó Zsolt
Try IMP http://www.horde.org/ zs > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 2002. február 8. 14:52 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: webmail for debian > > > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? > > Thanks > > Josep > > > -- > T

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
I've been using Silkymail from http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail. It's a modified version of IMP that has a very smooth user interface (it's very similar to the Mulberry email client, which I also use and like very much). Installation is either a (relative) breeze or a nightmare. It's a breez

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Erik Wenzel
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 02:52:29PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Try apt-get install nocc on sid/woody. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Robert Waldner
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 10:52:47 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >Any hint about the fix for squirrel? dpkg -i squirrelmail-package vi /var/lib/dpkg/status change the dependency from "perl-base" to "perl" or "perl-5.005" (or the other way around, can't remember) apt-get install squirrelmail chee

RE: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Craigsc
Try horde / imp ..Craig -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, February 08, 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: webmail for debian does anybody know some webmail system for debian? Thanks Josep -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL

Re: webmail for debian

2002-02-08 Thread Robert Waldner
On Fri, 08 Feb 2002 14:52:29 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: >does anybody know some webmail system for debian? squirrelmail (from unstable, but getting it to work on a stable box is a one-line - fix) works pretty well here. cheers, &rw -- / Ing. Robert Waldner | Security Engineer | CoreTe

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> I would be pretty surprised if there is no c library for IMAP as well. GNU mailutils (libmailbox) has IMAP support. It is still in development. http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils/ Jeremy C. Reed echo 'G014AE824B0-07CC?/JJFFFI?D64CB>D=3C427=>;>6HI2>

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-13 Thread Jeremy C. Reed
> I would be pretty surprised if there is no c library for IMAP as well. GNU mailutils (libmailbox) has IMAP support. It is still in development. http://www.gnu.org/software/mailutils/ Jeremy C. Reed echo 'G014AE824B0-07CC?/JJFFFI?D64CB>D=3C427=>;>6HI2>

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-13 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > > Of course, I know... > > > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK. > > > That's why I asked about c-client library... > > > > I wo

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-13 Thread Keith G. Murphy
Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > > Of course, I know... > > > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK. > > > That's why I asked about c-client library... > > > > I w

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Vector
ssage - From: "Jeremy Lunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; ; Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:03 AM Subject: Re: Webmail - considerations... > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00P

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > Of course, I know... > > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK. > > That's why I asked about c-client library... > > I would be pretty surprised if there is no c

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Vector
ssage - From: "Jeremy Lunn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Przemyslaw Wegrzyn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Russell Coker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sent: Tuesday, June 12, 2001 7:03 AM Subject: Re: Webmail - considerations... > On T

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with > > IMAP protocol yet... > > Depending what language you use you won't need to know the IMAP > protocol. Th

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Jeremy Lunn
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with > IMAP protocol yet... Depending what language you use you won't need to know the IMAP protocol. Things like perl and php have IMAP modules. -- Jeremy L

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > Of course, I know... > > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK. > > That's why I asked about c-client library... > > I would be pretty surprised if there is no c

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > Another thing, do the webmail systems use directory notifications? With > directory notifications the application can be informed by the kernel > when new files are created. The IMAP protocol supports announcing new > mail to the client. If the m

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Jeremy Lunn
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 02:59:00PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > Of course, I know... > But our middle-tier will be developed using C++ , AFAIK. > That's why I asked about c-client library... I would be pretty surprised if there is no c library for IMAP as well. -- Jeremy Lunn Melbourne,

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Jeremy Lunn wrote: > On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with > > IMAP protocol yet... > > Depending what language you use you won't need to know the IMAP > protocol. T

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Jeremy Lunn
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > Thanx, I didn't know this feature... Acctually, I'm not so familiar with > IMAP protocol yet... Depending what language you use you won't need to know the IMAP protocol. Things like perl and php have IMAP modules. -- Jeremy

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 10 June 2001 17:16, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > 1. Almost every available webmail system uses the following way of > handling (rreceiving, in this example) attachements: load the whole > message body from IMAP server or message file, decode it and send to > the client. > The _whole_ attac

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, Russell Coker wrote: > Another thing, do the webmail systems use directory notifications? With > directory notifications the application can be informed by the kernel > when new files are created. The IMAP protocol supports announcing new > mail to the client. If the

Re: Webmail - considerations...

2001-06-12 Thread Russell Coker
On Sunday 10 June 2001 17:16, Przemyslaw Wegrzyn wrote: > 1. Almost every available webmail system uses the following way of > handling (rreceiving, in this example) attachements: load the whole > message body from IMAP server or message file, decode it and send to > the client. > The _whole_ atta

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread John Ackermann
--On Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:04 AM +0200 Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and > IMP/Horde. I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail), whi

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread John Ackermann
--On Wednesday, April 18, 2001 10:04 AM +0200 Przemyslaw Wegrzyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > >> > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and >> > IMP/Horde. >> >> I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread Pontus Ullgren
We use a the following combo: Apache with mod_ssl (http://www.apache.org/) IMAP server pick any you like (we run courier www.courier-mta.org) and SquirrelMail (http://www.squirrelmail.org/) I find SquirrelMail alot faster than IMP (but it lacks some of the features you can find in IMP). If you run

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and > > IMP/Horde. > > I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail), which > is an enhanced version of IMP. It's under the GPL, but Cyrusoft are > offe

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread Pontus Ullgren
We use a the following combo: Apache with mod_ssl (http://www.apache.org/) IMAP server pick any you like (we run courier www.courier-mta.org) and SquirrelMail (http://www.squirrelmail.org/) I find SquirrelMail alot faster than IMP (but it lacks some of the features you can find in IMP). If you ru

Re: webmail

2001-04-18 Thread Przemyslaw Wegrzyn
On Tue, 17 Apr 2001, John Ackermann N8UR wrote: > > I want to recommend you IMP. You can set IMAP server on firewall and > > IMP/Horde. > > I've been playing with SilkyMail (http://www.cyrusoft.com/silkymail), which > is an enhanced version of IMP. It's under the GPL, but Cyrusoft are > off

Re: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
--On Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:24 PM +0400 Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hello, Theo! Theodore Alexandrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: Would you advice some standart stuff for webmail server installing? Some users need to read post outside our net and using Win-clients with telnet

RE: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread Franck GUILLOIS
imp: http://www.horde.org/imp/ HTH > -Message d'origine- > De : Theodore Alexandrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoye : mardi 17 avril 2001 21:00 > A : debian-isp@lists.debian.org > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : webmail > > > > Hello, > > Would you advice some standart stuff for w

Re: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hello, Theo! Theodore Alexandrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you advice some standart stuff for webmail server installing? > Some users need to read post outside our net and using Win-clients with > telnet (deny at firewall) and IE only. And all other solutions are > appreciated. I want

Re: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread John Ackermann N8UR
--On Tuesday, April 17, 2001 11:24 PM +0400 Peter Novodvorsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, Theo! > > Theodore Alexandrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Would you advice some standart stuff for webmail server installing? >> Some users need to read post outside our net and using Win-clien

RE: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread Franck GUILLOIS
imp: http://www.horde.org/imp/ HTH > -Message d'origine- > De : Theodore Alexandrov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Envoye : mardi 17 avril 2001 21:00 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : webmail > > > > Hello, > > Would you advice some standart stuff for webmail s

Re: webmail

2001-04-17 Thread Peter Novodvorsky
Hello, Theo! Theodore Alexandrov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Would you advice some standart stuff for webmail server installing? > Some users need to read post outside our net and using Win-clients with > telnet (deny at firewall) and IE only. And all other solutions are > appreciated. I want

Re: webmail (2)

2000-07-20 Thread Sami Haahtinen
_How_ does it support https? i'm running the imp from potato, via https... On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Emilis wrote: > Hi all > Some words about webmail horde/imp > I'm try to use imp debian package from potato > (imp_2.2.0-3.potato.1.deb) And i have a problems with IE 5.x chache.

Re: webmail (2)

2000-07-20 Thread Sami Haahtinen
_How_ does it support https? i'm running the imp from potato, via https... On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 11:50:52AM +0200, Emilis wrote: > Hi all > Some words about webmail horde/imp > I'm try to use imp debian package from potato > (imp_2.2.0-3.potato.1.deb) And i have a problems with IE 5.x chache.

Re: webmail service.

2000-07-19 Thread Sanjeev Gupta
IMP, with HORDE. Debian package. Requires MySQL, not for messages, but authentication of web login, not actual user login. Works well. extremely stable. At 12:39 PM 7/19/2000 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: Hello all. I am looking for information or links to a webmail program. I am running Debian

Re: webmail service.

2000-07-19 Thread Sanjeev Gupta
IMP, with HORDE. Debian package. Requires MySQL, not for messages, but authentication of web login, not actual user login. Works well. extremely stable. At 12:39 PM 7/19/2000 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: >Hello all. I am looking for information or links to a webmail program. I am >running De

Re: Webmail service addition

2000-07-19 Thread Daniel Free
ohh yea, neomail only needs perl suidperl and a cgi enabled webserver At 13:23 19/07/00 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: I would prefer not to have to run *SQL etc. I ultimatly would like the service to simply plug into my existing service. I do run mySQL but I really don't want to pound that kind of o

Re: webmail service.

2000-07-19 Thread Daniel Free
Neomail is the best webmail programme i have come across yet, its what we run here. it isnt a debian package but it has a very clean install and is a very useable programme. neomail.sourceforge.net check it out At 12:39 19/07/00 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: Hello all. I am looking for informatio

Re: Webmail service addition

2000-07-19 Thread Daniel Free
ohh yea, neomail only needs perl suidperl and a cgi enabled webserver At 13:23 19/07/00 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: >I would prefer not to have to run *SQL etc. I ultimatly would like the >service to simply plug into my existing service. I do run mySQL but I really >don't want to pound that kind

Re: webmail service.

2000-07-19 Thread Daniel Free
Neomail is the best webmail programme i have come across yet, its what we run here. it isnt a debian package but it has a very clean install and is a very useable programme. neomail.sourceforge.net check it out At 12:39 19/07/00 -0700, Scott Thompson wrote: >Hello all. I am looking for inform