also sprach Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.20.1803
+0100]:
> Actually... as far as a lot of users are capable of thinking,
> that's exactly what SMTP should stand for: "I attach this file and
> send it, could it be simpler?". And you know something? I can
> see their po
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, martin f krafft wrote:
> 478181 kilobytes in a POP3 session... teach those folks that SMTP is
> not the simple mass transfer protocol.
Actually... as far as a lot of users are capable of thinking, that's exactly
what SMTP should stand for: "I attach this file and send it, coul
Hi there Martin!
On Sat, 2004-11-20 at 17:21, martin f krafft wrote:
> These are bytes. Be aware that this sort of accounting does not
> include the respective protocol, or additional TCP, or IP traffic.
Oh yes. I ignored them because in the small test session there was only
protocol traffic.
>
also sprach Teófilo Ruiz Suárez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.20.1733 +0100]:
> > Nov 20 16:55:22 quebrantahuesos pop3d-ssl: LOGOUT, user=teo,
> > ip=[:::217.125.62.238], top=0, retr=478181
> >
> > The "retr" field is in KBytes.
>
> As madduck said in his mail, this are bytes :)
Otherwise I'd
On Sunday, 07 November 2004 18:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You just need to add group(access) to that system accounts that you
> want or that you think that they'll break in unexpected places...
> Don't you think?
Why not do this the other way around; it's much simpler:
e.g. add users you don'
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 05:20:07PM +0100, Teófilo Ruiz Suárez wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 04:48:49PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> > Dear debian-isp list members,
> >
> > are there any ways of traffic accounting related to Courier POP3d and
> > IMAPd? We need this on a per-domain basis. The ac
also sprach Philipp Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.20.1648 +0100]:
> are there any ways of traffic accounting related to Courier POP3d and
> IMAPd? We need this on a per-domain basis. The accounting for
> incoming/outgoing mail is easy, as our mailserver of choice -- Exim v4
> -- logs the messag
On Sat, Nov 20, 2004 at 04:48:49PM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Dear debian-isp list members,
>
> are there any ways of traffic accounting related to Courier POP3d and
> IMAPd? We need this on a per-domain basis. The accounting for
> incoming/outgoing mail is easy, as our mailserver of choice -- E
On Sunday, 07 November 2004 18:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You just need to add group(access) to that system accounts that you
> want or that you think that they'll break in unexpected places...
> Don't you think?
Why not do this the other way around--it should be much simpler, and
only affect
Hmm. Will the users need to connect to the MySQL server itself or is
the user administration going to just be using MySQL as a backend
database?
If you're just using MySQL as a backend repository for users and the
users won't be connecting directly to the MySQL database then you
probably sho
astic config changes, just the
obvious necessary settings to access the DB.
Thanks!
Robert
- Original Message -
From: "W.D.McKinney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, November 18, 2004 3:47 AM
Subject: Re: decent webmail software - does it exist
No, that would be fine, as long as u had an index for the commonly accessed
columns. You would need millions of rows to see a performance hit even on a
slow system.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 10:23:53AM +0100, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:19:36PM +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> > Then it was OpenWebMail. It has problems with Subjects containing
> > russian text.
>
> FYI, headers must be in plain ASCII (RFC822). But I agree that eve
Hello,
Craig Sanders a écrit :
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 01:51:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
Take a look at http://www.sk-tech.net/support/HPrpm2deb.sh.html
It worked straightforward for me.
This script fetches the RPM for RedHat on HP's FTP site, does alien,
adapts some things for debian and
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> > On Thursday 18 November 2004 10.23, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> > > FYI, headers must be in plain ASCII (RFC822). But I agree that everyone
> > > wants to have a subject in the same language as the body.
> >
Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote:
> On Thursday 18 November 2004 10.23, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> > FYI, headers must be in plain ASCII (RFC822). But I agree that everyone
> > wants to have a subject in the same language as the body.
>
> Headers can contain any charset they wish, as long
On Thursday 18 November 2004 10.23, Bertrand Yvain wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:19:36PM +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> > Then it was OpenWebMail. It has problems with Subjects containing
> > russian text.
>
> FYI, headers must be in plain ASCII (RFC822). But I agree that everyone
>
Hi,
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 02:19:36PM +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> Then it was OpenWebMail. It has problems with Subjects containing
> russian text.
FYI, headers must be in plain ASCII (RFC822). But I agree that everyone
wants to have a subject in the same language as the body.
--
Lost Oasi
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 21:31 +0500, Timur Irmatov wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:46:57PM +, David Reynolds wrote:
> >
> > Try IlohaMail. It is robust and fast and also multilingual. Looking at
> > the demo on their site. It appears to support Russian. Not being Russian
> > Speaking mysel
On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 at 07:40:01AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> one other problem, is that i can't get the kernel to detect the full
> amount of RAM - it has 2GB, but it's only detecting 1GB. I tried
> adding mem=1920M in grub but that didn't help.
doh! i forgot to compile high memory support in
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 01:51:00PM +0200, Emmanuel Halbwachs wrote:
> >The next step is getting the hp monitoring tools working on debian.
>
> Take a look at http://www.sk-tech.net/support/HPrpm2deb.sh.html
> It worked straightforward for me.
>
> This script fetches the RPM for RedHat on HP's FTP
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 01:46:57PM +, David Reynolds wrote:
>
> Try IlohaMail. It is robust and fast and also multilingual. Looking at
> the demo on their site. It appears to support Russian. Not being Russian
> Speaking myself I can't tell how well it handles it, but it looks
> Russian to
On Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 06:36:54PM +0300, Max Kosmach wrote:
> >Then I tried IMP. It cannot properly display messages in utf-8
> >charset.
> IMP from testing/unstable work with utf-8
well, works but with some flaws. I have installed 1.5.0 development
version, it allows me to reply to emails cont
Timur Irmatov wrote:
Hi!
Then I tried IMP. It cannot properly display messages in utf-8
charset.
IMP from testing/unstable work with utf-8
--
With Best Wishes
Max
CCSA,CCSE
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ce jour Tue, 16 Nov 2004, Mark Bucciarelli a dit:
> On Tuesday 16 November 2004 10:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > DEFAULT=/var/spool/courier/user/$LOGNAME/Maildir
> > $HOME=/var/spool/courier/user/$LOGNAME
> ^^^
> This dollar sign looks wrong.
>
> > MAILBOX=$HOME/Maildir
> > $INCLUDE=$MAILBO
Timur Irmatov wrote:
== SNIP ==
I am russian-speaking person, and thus main requirement for webmail
software is complete and robust support of russian language - both in
interface and emails.
Try IlohaMail. It is robust and fast and also multilingual. Looking at
the demo on their site. It appears
Try loading two additional netfilter modules to do conection tracking for your
ftp conection called "ip_conntrack_ftp" and "ip_nat_ftp" this should sort out
your problem
Regards
Corne Alberts
Information Architect
Quoting Francisco Castillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> Hello,
>
> I has a proftpd
This one time, at band camp, Wouter Verhelst said:
> Op di, 16-11-2004 te 19:28 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
> > On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> > > Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> > > Authentication?
> > > Or get a list of users and their
Op di, 16-11-2004 te 19:28 +0100, schreef David Schmitt:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> > Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> > Authentication?
> > Or get a list of users and their level? admin, regular user and so on. I
> > believe
> > th
> -Original Message-
> From: Jacob S [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 16, 2004 11:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Debian for ISP
>
> On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:24 -0700
> Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello all
On Tue, Nov 16, 2004 at 09:15:24AM -0700, Omar wrote:
> Also I want to ask if there is a way that I can check the user
> Authentication?
> Or get a list of users and their level? admin, regular user and so on. I
> believe
> that the previous admin used LDAP, is there a way I can look into the L
On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 09:15:24 -0700
Omar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have just took over a network for an ISP that is running Debian, I
> am used to
> using Cpanel/Whm and now I have to use the CLI.
>
> The ISP also provides Hosting services and it uses dbdns 1.03,
> tinydns, x
Omar wrote:
Also I am thinking of installing webmin, so I can configure everything over the
web, if I do install it, will it recognize the current system, and the current
settings or will I have to take things in manually.
Not sure about the other questions, but Webmin will recognise your
curr
On Tuesday 16 November 2004 10:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> DEFAULT=/var/spool/courier/user/$LOGNAME/Maildir
> $HOME=/var/spool/courier/user/$LOGNAME
^^^
This dollar sign looks wrong.
> MAILBOX=$HOME/Maildir
> $INCLUDE=$MAILBOX
Try it without the dollar sign prefixes; that is,
DEFAULT=/var/s
Ce jour Mon, 15 Nov 2004, simon raven a dit:
> Ce jour Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Mark Bucciarelli a dit:
>
>
>
> aah, good idea. i assume man maildrop will have that info. i was going
> to set the -V option but acccording to that man page -V isn't respected
> when run in delivery mode (-d).
ok, settin
Ce jour Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Francisco Castillo a dit:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> when i connect from a cuteftp client from a 192.168.0.Y ip the client get
> the correct pasive port to get data (4) from the proftpd server but
> if i try to access from a public client ip (with cuteftp too) the server
On Mon, 2004-11-15 at 21:51, Christofer Algotsson wrote:
> martin f krafft wrote:
> > Is there a way to automatically log out users after a certain idle
> > period? I would need this automatic logout on a per-service basis,
> > thus e.g. logging out KDE and tty users while keeping SSH users
> > log
Ce jour Mon, 15 Nov 2004, Mark Bucciarelli a dit:
> On Monday 15 November 2004 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > so really, this is 2 problems in one: one is the .mailfilter file isn't
> > read, and that log snippet which no sense.
>
> Seems like the same problem--mailrop is not given the co
On Monday 15 November 2004 17:15, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> so really, this is 2 problems in one: one is the .mailfilter file isn't
> read, and that log snippet which no sense.
Seems like the same problem--mailrop is not given the correct home dir.
Put some logging in /etc/courier/maildroprc a
Quoting Antonin Karasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm using bind9 and want to enable my users to configure DNS over
> web-interface. Is it anyhow possible to configure bind9 over LDAP or
> MySQL or must I work with text files?
http://www.venaas.no/ldap/bind-sdb/
> And one more question - Have anybo
also sprach Antonin Karasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.15.1619 +0100]:
> And one more question - Have anybody heard about open-source (GPL)
> web-based administration for bind9?
webmin-bind should work
--
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
.''`. martin f. kra
also sprach Christofer Algotsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.15.1151 +0100]:
> Idled might be a solution.
>
> http://www.darkwing.com/idled/
Well, this seems rather dead upstream. I'll ping.
--
Please do not CC me when replying to lists; I read them!
.''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTE
First, read out aloud the first line of my signature, then read the
Debian list policy, then verify the Mail-Followup-To header of my
posts, and then do not CC anyone again unless requested.
also sprach Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.13.1228 +0100]:
> fetches data on Port 12345 but
Hello
On 2004-11-12 martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.12.1538 +0100]:
> > I remember a network sniffer that could be run e.g. over a week to
> > collects a list of all used tcp/udp ports which could then be used
> > as base for creating a firewall
Sorry, this email address has been disabled by the KeyGhost webmaster due to an
overflow of incoming spam.
If you wish to contact us, please visit our website for a valid email address.
Thank you,
The KeyGhost Team
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe".
also sprach Christian Hammers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.12.1538 +0100]:
> I remember a network sniffer that could be run e.g. over a week to
> collects a list of all used tcp/udp ports which could then be used
> as base for creating a firewall script for hosts.
What an extraordinarily bad idea.
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:47:17PM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> i like the way it works. makes it easy to model the flow of mail from
> component to component.
On the other hand, it introduces complexity into the system. It's a lot
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 10:09:36AM +0100, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder
wrote:
> On Friday 12 November 2004 07.47, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
>
> > > > 4 ETRN
> > >
> > > Weird, people are just sending ETRN commands to you?
On Friday 12 November 2004 07.47, Craig Sanders wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> > > 4 ETRN
> >
> > Weird, people are just sending ETRN commands to you?
me too. One is a mail server of a respected company that is apparently
misconfigured, and has bee
also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.12.0612 +0100]:
> And I get many legitimate e-mails with a bad HELO. In fact,
> I would argue that your rule here is wrong. If I send you an
> e-mail from my laptop, it is not going to send you an address of
> a server that can receive mail (o
On Fri, Nov 12, 2004 at 05:12:34AM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> > 2. postfix does support filtering during the SMTP transaction. the
> > difference
> > is that the postfix author tells you up front that it is inherently
> > problematic
> > (for *ANY* MTA, not just postfix) because of the potenti
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 05:12:10PM -0500, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:
> On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:04, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > 22256 Bad HELO
>
> wow.
most of them being spammers trying to use my IP address or a bogus domain name
in the HELO/EHLO string. and most of them from Korea.
most
On 2004-11-11, Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> a few comments, though:
>
> 1. "synchronization detection" - postfix has done this for years, except that
> it's called "reject_unauth_pipelining". you enable it as one of the
Hi Craig,
> 2. postfix does support filtering during the SMTP transaction. the difference
> is that the postfix author tells you up front that it is inherently
> problematic
> (for *ANY* MTA, not just postfix) because of the potential for SMTP timeouts
> if
> the filter takes too long to run (S
On Thursday 11 November 2004 17:04, Craig Sanders wrote:
> 22256 Bad HELO
wow.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Nov 11, 2004 at 09:25:52PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> I just switched from Postfix to Exim. I am now a big fan of Exim.
>
> http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/08/latest-experiment-exim/
> http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/11/exim-transition-successful/
glad to
Oh yeah ur right. :) The file system itself is written in the stripes and
stripe boundaries don't have to correspond to cluster boundaries although I
think this would be advantageous. 1 cluster -> 1 stripe would be the
optimum speed configuration I think.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMA
On Saturday 06 November 2004 22:19, Rodney Richison wrote:
Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
exim.
i use postfix/courier-imap,pop3/maildrop/sqwebmail with amavisd-new, clamav,
spamassasin, razor and pyzor. mysql is my userdatabase and postfixadmin my
webfront
I just switched from Postfix to Exim. I am now a big fan of Exim.
http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/08/latest-experiment-exim/
http://changelog.complete.org/articles/2004/11/11/exim-transition-successful/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
On Saturday 06 November 2004 22:19, Rodney Richison wrote:
> Are most of you using exim or postfix? Just curious. I've never tried
> exim.
neither. courier-mta. just starting to have some production experience,
and so far i like it quite a bit.
i chose it because it has everything integrated
Hey,
You can simply add amavisd-new to your setup. You only need to configure
postfix to use it, and that's about it. From there you can start adding
scanners like ClamAV and Spamassassin. Since you want per-user
customability, i suggest you take a look at
"http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/RE
On Thursday 11 November 2004 09.12, Chris Wagner wrote:
> Since you (happy Adrian??)
Much easier to read :-)
[...]
> If u have 32KB stripes so that
> almost every file fits in 1 stripe, the leftover space is wasted. So a
> 2.5KB file written in a 32 KB stripe wastes 30.5 KB.
Err. This statemen
Ah, ok that changes everything. "mailboxes" ;)
At 12:30 AM 11/11/04 +0100, Marcin Owsiany wrote:
>> If u still need RAID 5 then I would make the stripe size equal to
>> average file size / number of data disks up to no more than 32KB stripe.
>
>Since avg file size would be something around 2500
also sprach Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[2004.11.11.0842 +0100]:
> To optimize random small reads, it's best if a read can be satisfied by
> touching only one disk, so large stripe sizes should be better - with your
> avg file size, 8k or 16k stripes should be fine;
On Wednesday 10 November 2004 23.29, Chris Wagner wrote:
It's 'you' - three letters :-)
> If u still need RAID 5 then I would make the
> stripe size equal to average file size / number of data disks up to no
> more than 32KB stripe.
To optimize random small reads, it's best if a read can be sati
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 05:29:37PM -0500, Chris Wagner wrote:
> I would say that RAID 5 is probably overkill for a mail queue.
It's not the mail queue. Its the mail store (maildirs). We have no
problems with mail queue performance so far.
> Unless ur
> mail queue is running hundreds of gigabytes
I would say that RAID 5 is probably overkill for a mail queue. Unless ur
mail queue is running hundreds of gigabytes and overloading a single disk, a
normal single hard drive is sufficient. Based on ur graph it looks like ur
queue is under half a gig. If you want redundancy for the mail queue the
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Andreas Barth wrote:
> * Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041110 20:20]:
> > Oh you mean reject mail for unknown recipients rather than bounce the
> > mail[1]. Ok, I can see why you are suggesting it but it is an RFC
> > violation.
>
> Why should it be a RFC violation to
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:18:50PM -0500, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Craig Sanders wrote:
> > if you do have a backup MX, then you need to have the same anti-spam
> > & anti-virus rules as on your primary server AND (most important!) it
> > needs to have a list of valid recipient
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 02:10:18PM -0500, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Craig Sanders wrote:
>
> > backup MX is obsolete these days, very few people need it (most of
>
> This does seem to be a prevailing opinion but I think backup MXs are
> valuable now for the same reason they al
* Robert Brockway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041110 20:20]:
> Oh you mean reject mail for unknown recipients rather than bounce the
> mail[1]. Ok, I can see why you are suggesting it but it is an RFC
> violation.
Why should it be a RFC violation to reject mail for unknown recipients
with 550? If a remo
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Craig Sanders wrote:
> if you do have a backup MX, then you need to have the same anti-spam
> & anti-virus rules as on your primary server AND (most important!) it
> needs to have a list of valid recipients, so that it can 5xx reject
> mail for unknown users rather than accept
On Wed, 10 Nov 2004, Craig Sanders wrote:
> backup MX is obsolete these days, very few people need it (most of
This does seem to be a prevailing opinion but I think backup MXs are
valuable now for the same reason they always were - outages happen. We
have no way of knowing how long a remote MTA
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 11:09:47AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.1014 +0100]:
> > > I agree. But exim can do it. And even though this is the LDA
> > > part of it, postfix also includes an LDA, which is just not up
> > > to speed.
> >
> >
Michael Graham wrote:
Ben Hutchings wrote:
Christopher Swingley wrote:
Change the ownership and permissions on their .bash_profile and .bashrc
to root:root 644:
-rw-r--r--1 root root 420 Sep 21 13:05
.bash_profile -rw-r--r--1 root root 746 Sep 21
13:05 .ba
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.1014 +0100]:
> > I agree. But exim can do it. And even though this is the LDA
> > part of it, postfix also includes an LDA, which is just not up
> > to speed.
>
> and postfix can do it too.
No, it cannot, unless you use spamassassin as the
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 09:19:49AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0901 +0100]:
> > > Anyway, if you are so confident about postfix, then maybe you
> > > can teach me how to set up spamassassin to run under the local
> > > user's identity,
>
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0901 +0100]:
> > Anyway, if you are so confident about postfix, then maybe you
> > can teach me how to set up spamassassin to run under the local
> > user's identity,
>
> procmail, maildrop or whatever local delivery agent you use can
> run
On Wed, Nov 10, 2004 at 08:21:14AM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0010 +0100]:
> > > There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> > > solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> > > do with procm
also sprach Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.10.0010 +0100]:
> > There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> > solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> > do with procmail that I can now deal with in ~ 3 lines in the exim
> > config.
>
> my
On Wed, 2004-11-10 at 11:20, Rhesa Rozendaal wrote:
> We recently bought a new machine. It's a Super Micro motherboard model
> X5DPA-TGM with Intel's ICH5-SATA Serial ATA IDE chipset. I'd like to
> know if anyone has experience with it in combination with Debian.
>
> I did find http://www.lathi.
On Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:43:19 -0500, Doug Griswold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> can upload the changes. You will get tired of that real quick. Other
> than this method there is always a what if factor selinux,chroot,
> virtual server etc...
The point is to minimize the "what if" factors by choos
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 11:56:04PM +0100, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote:
> ## Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:04:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > > also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1954 +0100]:
>
> > > rbldns (djbdns) is (a) non-fr
On Sun, Nov 07, 2004 at 01:40:30PM +, Brett Parker wrote:
> There have been some very simple things that I've needed to find
> solutions to with postfix in the past which I ended up having to
> do with procmail that I can now deal with in ~ 3 lines in the exim
> config.
my guess is that you j
## Craig Sanders ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:04:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> > also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1954 +0100]:
> > rbldns (djbdns) is (a) non-free,
> nope.
> rbldnsd is NOT djbdns.
Confusion :)
There is rbldns, part of djbdns:
Don't give them shell access, and don't let them ftp to the server.
Make them email you all the changes so you can browse for bad code.
Then you
can upload the changes. You will get tired of that real quick. Other
than this method there is always a what if factor selinux,chroot,
virtual serve
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 08:04:24PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1954 +0100]:
> > This got me to thinking, it would be neat if one could _easily_
> > replicate RBLs on their own local DNS server.
>
> rbldns (djbdns) is (a) non-free,
no
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 03:30:03PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> On 2004-11-09, Steve Drees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > John Goerzen <> wrote:
> >> I'm looking at redoing my mail setup due primarily to spam filtering.
> >> Over at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/multimx.html,
> >>
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 04:10:07PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1514 +0100]:
> > It seems to make a lot of sense to me, but it seems too that
> > I must be missing something.
>
> if the backup MX is configured exactly like the primary, th
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 02:14:15PM +, John Goerzen wrote:
> I'm looking at redoing my mail setup due primarily to spam filtering.
> Over at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/multimx.html,
> they are suggesting not to use redundant mail servers unless needed
> for load balancing.
On Mon, 8 Nov 2004 09:28:10 -0900, Christopher Swingley
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Make symbolic links between allowed commands and '/usr/local/rbin'
>
> As I said before, this is just a simple attempt to reduce priviledge.
> There are undoubtably ways around it, some easier than others dependin
Quoting Steve Drees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> John Goerzen <> wrote:
> > I'm looking at redoing my mail setup due primarily to spam filtering.
> > Over at http://www.tldp.org/HOWTO/Spam-Filtering-for-MX/multimx.html,
> > they are suggesting not to use redundant mail servers unless needed
> > for load
also sprach Bill Flanagan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.2111 +0100]:
> Any pointers on things to look at?
The Linspire support community
The KDE mailing lists
The Samba mailing lists
A Linux reference
*Maybe* debian-user
--> but not here.
> Does putting a name and p/w into local client authent
On Tue, 9 Nov 2004, Dale E. Martin wrote:
> > i usually have my backup MX accept everything and then don't treat
> > them specially on the primary. thus, policy is still enforced on the
> > primary, but there is a proper backup path *under my control* should
> > the primary be unreachable for what
also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1954 +0100]:
> This got me to thinking, it would be neat if one could _easily_
> replicate RBLs on their own local DNS server.
rbldns (djbdns) is (a) non-free, and (b) really nice and easy to use
for this purpose.
> Then you could easily
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 13:54 -0500 "Dale E. Martin"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This got me to thinking, it would be neat if one could _easily_ replicate
RBLs on their own local DNS server. Then you could easily point primary
and secondary at your local RBL and manage it just in your D
On Tue, Nov 09, 2004 at 05:04:09PM +0100, martin f krafft wrote:
> also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1652 +0100]:
> > With this approach you can't bounce RBLed messages at SMTP connect
> > time though, right? (I realize that RBLs are semi-controversial,
> > especially at t
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 17:04 +0100 martin f krafft
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
also sprach Dale E. Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.11.09.1652 +0100]:
With this approach you can't bounce RBLed messages at SMTP connect
time though, right? (I realize that RBLs are semi-controversial,
espe
--On Tuesday, November 09, 2004 08:43 -0600 Steve Drees
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd suggest having a backup MX but make sure you have all the filtering at
your backup that you have at your primary.
Unless you can check for valid users at the secondary, don't do it.
Spammers will attempt to
## [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> It concerns to a limit of 255 octals while one octal is equal
> 3 bit
They are talking about "octets", which stands for "eight bits".
In ASCII representation, that's a character.
Regards,
Christoph
--
Spare Space
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
301 - 400 of 17072 matches
Mail list logo
