On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
Hello,
Hi !
should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure
out which user it is by the server-name they are using ie
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
a small client base now, so I think it should be alright). So I need a
smtp/pop package that is light-weight, and doesnt have much overhead. The
Postfix is a great MTA (Mail Transfer Agent). I don't know hich pop
package would
--disabled-password userand
authenticate with a htpasswd file).
Thanks again for any more insight,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:07 AM
To: Matthew Walkup
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosting for Email
1) Im wondering if this is possible, or what is the next-best solution.
No. nor POP nor IMAP support HTTP 'Host: ' like constructions
Next best thing: let your users login as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
Message -
From: Matthew Walkup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting for Email
Thanks for the replies Jeremy...
Well thats what I was looking for, and I figured that about the POP3 (kind
of a shame, isnt it :P). I
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:07, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out
which user it is by the server-name they are using ie 'mail.client1.com'
or
That is not possible
Thanks everyone for the input, was very helpful...
That was my first post, and im very impressed ;)... Thanks guys for all the
tips.
-Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:21:22AM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
their logins. but i dont want to use the linux auth for pop/imap/mta. Im
expecting to have several hundred email addresses with only a few (10-20)
for ssh. Id rather not fill my passwd file with junk. Is this possible? =)
If
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
a small client base now, so I think it should be alright). So I need a
smtp/pop package that is light-weight, and doesnt have much overhead. The
Postfix is a great MTA (Mail Transfer Agent). I don't know hich pop
package would
--disabled-password userand
authenticate with a htpasswd file).
Thanks again for any more insight,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:07 AM
To: Matthew Walkup
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosting
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]and
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should BOTH
be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out which
user it is by the server-name
1) Im wondering if this is possible, or what is the next-best solution.
No. nor POP nor IMAP support HTTP 'Host: ' like constructions
Next best thing: let your users login as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Frank
Message -
From: Matthew Walkup [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting for Email
Thanks for the replies Jeremy...
Well thats what I was looking for, and I figured that about the POP3 (kind
of a shame, isnt
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:07, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out
which user it is by the server-name they are using ie 'mail.client1.com'
or
That is not possible
Thanks everyone for the input, was very helpful...
That was my first post, and im very impressed ;)... Thanks guys for all the
tips.
-Matt
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:21:22AM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
their logins. but i dont want to use the linux auth for pop/imap/mta. Im
expecting to have several hundred email addresses with only a few (10-20)
for ssh. Id rather not fill my passwd file with junk. Is this possible? =)
If
16 matches
Mail list logo
