Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-20 Thread martin f krafft
(sorry, list...) jesse, i am trying to fix your DNS but i can't get in touch with you because your DNS is broken, and mail can't be delivered. do you have another email account that you can use? i could give you one temporarily, or just get one at hushmail.com i hope you are seeing this message

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-18 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.18.1939 +0100]: > We have a caching only nameserver on our firewall. Apparently, whoever > setup the original DNS on that machine "had" to put zone files in there > pointing to our internal host in order for the local lan to access our > hosted si

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-18 Thread Jesse
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 19:59, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > > however, you can't place > > > > > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > > > > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > > > > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-18 Thread Jesse
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 19:59, martin f krafft wrote: > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > > however, you can't place > > > > > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > > > > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > > > > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-17 Thread Marcel Hicking
On 16 Jan 2002, at 11:37, Jesse wrote: > [...] > > And then just let apache handle the name based vhosts? Is > it really necessary to have a seperate zone file for each > vhost? Since Martin has discussed the bind part, I'll try to explain the apache bit in somewhat common language. Think it a t

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-17 Thread Marcel Hicking
On 16 Jan 2002, at 11:37, Jesse wrote: > [...] > > And then just let apache handle the name based vhosts? Is > it really necessary to have a seperate zone file for each > vhost? Since Martin has discussed the bind part, I'll try to explain the apache bit in somewhat common language. Think it a

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > however, you can't place > > > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate zone file for each. > > It did work believe it or not :) i tried it, and:

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > however, you can't place > > > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate zone file for each. > > It did work believe it or not :) i tried it, and:

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > however, you can't place > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > It did work believe it or not :) are you kidding me??? i am going to have to try that right now... i can't reproduce it. where is this

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.2031 +0100]: > > however, you can't place > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > It did work believe it or not :) are you kidding me??? i am going to have to try that right now... i can't reproduce it. where is this

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread Jesse
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:58, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]: [...] > yes, absolutely. > > however, you can't place > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]: > I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our > current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each > virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind > b

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread Jesse
On Wednesday 16 January 2002 12:58, martin f krafft wrote: > > also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]: [...] > yes, absolutely. > > however, you can't place > > vhost.com. IN CNAME ... > > into a zone for our.real.domain. > > maybe it would even work, but you need a separate

Re: apache-dns cname-vhost

2002-01-16 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Jesse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2002.01.16.1737 +0100]: > I am a newbie administrator and I'm in the process of upgrading(fixing) our > current dns setup. Right now there is a dns forward zone set up for each > virtual host. After reading some docs on apache.org and the dns and bind >