On Thu, 13 Apr 2000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>The problem is that there are not much users per domain but a lot of
>domains. I think this version is only suitable if you have to handle 1000
>or more Acconts for only one domain. And especially with only one
>administrator.
>
>I think the Communigat
Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good
> uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for.
>From the admin point of view, yes. But from the client point of view,
NO.
My clients are very happy beacause they can manage the
> Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good
> uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for.
Sure, I don't think that Web-based administration is the best solution,
but if you have to handle a few customers want to create or delete their
account for their domain
Web-based administration is silly, IMHO. Sure, folks have good
uses for it, I don't. Though that is what they asked for.
Far easier is to have a database backend for it, then use a
web-based thingy (if you have to) to update the DB with users.
B.C.J.O <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12 Apr
On 12 Apr 2000, Francois Deppierraz wrote:
> Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Postfix+Courier+IMP.
>
> ... and for the per web administration ?
>
> I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
ditto. qmail has been very solid for me in high-volume environments and
the vp
Aaron Dewell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Postfix+Courier+IMP.
... and for the per web administration ?
I use qmail+vpopmail+qmailadmin+IMP and it works fine.
--
Francois Deppierraz student
http://www.ctrlaltdel.ch
ICQ: 176 770 09
Postfix+Courier+IMP.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> does anybody know about some great mailserver solutions for ISP use. Some
> features it has to know is VirtualHost support, a WebMail interface,
> administration per web, etc.
>
> kind regards,
> achim hendriks
7 matches
Mail list logo
