Am 20:42 2003-03-05 +0100 hat Russell Coker geschrieben:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
LRP is dead and has been for a long time.
Portslave is in Debian, I don't think that LRP offers anything else of much
use.
Just install a small Debian system.
It is not death...
Look at
Hello,
Am 17:20 2003-03-05 +0100 hat Burner geschrieben:
I've read some iptables and iproute2 howtos, but i realy do not know where
to
begin, i dont even know if the hardware will be sufficient. P3/800 128Mb ram
and two good NIC's.
Hmmm, do you like to root an OC3 with heavy traffic ???
I
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:13, Michelle Konzack wrote:
Am 20:42 2003-03-05 +0100 hat Russell Coker geschrieben:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
LRP is dead and has been for a long time.
Portslave is in Debian, I don't think that LRP offers anything else of
much use.
Just
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 21:09, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
Can be done with a 486/100 and LRP http://www.linuxrouter.org
which is based on Debian.
You go to the trouble to point people at the LEAF lists in another post,
but then refer to LRP here... the LRP project has not been touched since
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:22, Donovan Baarda wrote:
mid 2001. The LEAF project continued the work started by LRP, and the
based on Debian you are referring to is probably the Bearing variant
of the LEAF project available at;
Another thing that should be mentioned is that Portslave (which was a
Am 20:42 2003-03-05 +0100 hat Russell Coker geschrieben:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
LRP is dead and has been for a long time.
Portslave is in Debian, I don't think that LRP offers anything else of much
use.
Just install a small Debian system.
It is not death...
Look at
Hello,
Am 17:20 2003-03-05 +0100 hat Burner geschrieben:
I've read some iptables and iproute2 howtos, but i realy do not know where
to
begin, i dont even know if the hardware will be sufficient. P3/800 128Mb ram
and two good NIC's.
Hmmm, do you like to root an OC3 with heavy traffic ???
I
On Wed, 2003-03-12 at 21:09, Michelle Konzack wrote:
[...]
Can be done with a 486/100 and LRP http://www.linuxrouter.org
which is based on Debian.
You go to the trouble to point people at the LEAF lists in another post,
but then refer to LRP here... the LRP project has not been touched since
On Mon, 17 Mar 2003 23:22, Donovan Baarda wrote:
mid 2001. The LEAF project continued the work started by LRP, and the
based on Debian you are referring to is probably the Bearing variant
of the LEAF project available at;
Another thing that should be mentioned is that Portslave (which was a
On Thu, 6 Mar 2003, Randy Kramer wrote:
What's the smallest someone on the list has installed, and what's the
easiest way to go about doing it?
One floppy. This is the smallest one I know of:
http://www.zelow.no/floppyfw/
Not a Debian, but based on and built using Debian.
Actively
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
I'd almost expect a firewall per T1, or what kind of
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 13:16, Randy Kramer wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
, is this flexibility at
the cost of performance, or is it just a new wonderland for network admins? :)
iproute2 (ip) is used for routing not for setting nat or packet filter
rules you can do everthing you used ifconfig and route for an a lot more
have a look at the Linux Advanced Routing Traffic Control HOWTO
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemens
PRIMERGY L200 with 2 Intel PIII
Volker Tanger schrieb:
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemens
PRIMERGY L200 with 2
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:08:45AM -0500, Randy Kramer wrote:
What's the smallest someone on the list has installed, and what's the
easiest way to go about doing it?
$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 129M 111M 11M 91% /
$
That
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 07:16, Peter Hicks wrote:
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:42:57PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
[...]
If the volume is higher or you just want a linux box then:
www.linuxrouter.org -- linux router project.
LRP is dead and has
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:42 pm, Russell Coker wrote:
Just install a small Debian system.
That might be exactly what I want to do (for a different purpose).
What's the smallest someone on the list has installed, and what's the
easiest way to go about doing it?
I'd like to have a small
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
I'd almost expect a firewall per T1, or what kind of
On Thu, 2003-03-06 at 13:16, Randy Kramer wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
Randy Kramer schrieb:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 02:41 pm, Burner wrote:
load average is about 5Mbyte/s spikes at 10MByte/s, all traffic is
webcontent.
That seems to be large volume -- three to seven T1s unless my math is
off (my coffee hasn't kicked in yet).
I'd almost expect a firewall per
, is this flexibility at
the cost of performance, or is it just a new wonderland for network admins? :)
iproute2 (ip) is used for routing not for setting nat or packet filter
rules you can do everthing you used ifconfig and route for an a lot more
have a look at the Linux Advanced Routing Traffic Control HOWTO
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemens
PRIMERGY L200 with 2 Intel PIII
Volker Tanger schrieb:
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port (64bit/66MHZ PCI) in a Fujits-Siemens
PRIMERGY L200 with 2
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 07:08:45AM -0500, Randy Kramer wrote:
What's the smallest someone on the list has installed, and what's the
easiest way to go about doing it?
$ df -h
FilesystemSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/hda2 129M 111M 11M 91% /
$
That
On Thu, Mar 06, 2003 at 04:01:29PM +0100, Volker Tanger wrote:
Greetings!
On Thu, 06 Mar 2003 14:38:08 +0100
Uwe A. P. Wuerdinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Depens on the harware.
We got 750 mbits on a single box with a 2 channel intel gigabit card
(Intel PRO/1000 MT Dual Port
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:20, Burner wrote:
I would like to keep the public IP addresses on the servers if possible.
Your servers can keep their public addresses if you wish, that should make the
job of firewalling a little easier (no masquerading to worry about).
Let's say you had a
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
You didn't mention volume. Also, public address and firewall seems to be a
contridiction.
If the volume is small, many of the $100 USD firewall boxes will work.
There will be some work redirecting IP through the firewall.
If the volume is higher
.
It maybe that you can port scan your network and turn off everything but
what you really want on.
Best of luck.
-Original Message-
From: Burner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:21 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Routing with Linux
Hi
My boos
Burner, Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:20:37PM +0100:
Hi
My boos just asked me to build a Linux firewall to protect our servers, we
have about 20 servers, all configured with only the public (internet) IP, and
connected through a switch directly to our IPS's router.
I've only build firewalls
Hi
My boos just asked me to build a Linux firewall to protect our servers, we
have about 20 servers, all configured with only the public (internet) IP, and
connected through a switch directly to our IPS's router.
I've only build firewalls for small lan networks using NAT with
: Routing with Linux
Hi
My boos just asked me to build a Linux firewall to protect our servers, we
have about 20 servers, all configured with only the public (internet) IP,
and
connected through a switch directly to our IPS's router.
I've only build firewalls for small lan networks using NAT
AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Routing with Linux
Hi
My boos just asked me to build a Linux firewall to protect our
servers, we have about 20 servers, all configured with only the
public (internet) IP, and
connected through a switch directly to our IPS's router.
I've only
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:20, Burner wrote:
I would like to keep the public IP addresses on the servers if possible.
Your servers can keep their public addresses if you wish, that should make the
job of firewalling a little easier (no masquerading to worry about).
Let's say you had a
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
You didn't mention volume. Also, public address and firewall seems to be a
contridiction.
If the volume is small, many of the $100 USD firewall boxes will work.
There will be some work redirecting IP through the firewall.
If the volume is higher
.
It maybe that you can port scan your network and turn off everything but
what you really want on.
Best of luck.
-Original Message-
From: Burner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:21 AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Routing with Linux
Hi
On Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 08:42:57PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 5 Mar 2003 18:14, Gregory Wood wrote:
You didn't mention volume. Also, public address and firewall seems to be a
contridiction.
If the volume is small, many of the $100 USD firewall boxes will work.
There will be some work
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 19:54, Fraser Campbell wrote:
On Wednesday 05 March 2003 11:20, Burner wrote:
I would like to keep the public IP addresses on the servers if possible.
Your servers can keep their public addresses if you wish, that should make
the job of firewalling a little easier
Burner, Wed, Mar 05, 2003 at 05:20:37PM +0100:
Hi
My boos just asked me to build a Linux firewall to protect our servers, we
have about 20 servers, all configured with only the public (internet) IP, and
connected through a switch directly to our IPS's router.
I've only build firewalls
39 matches
Mail list logo
