Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users

2004-10-05 Thread Marcel Hicking
--Tuesday, October 05, 2004 14:02:17 +0200 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > also sprach Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.1123 > +0200]: >> What does "better" mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to >> use/extend? Just curious. > > Having talked to Sven Mueller about this, he sa

Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users

2004-10-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Marcel Hicking <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.1123 +0200]: > What does "better" mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to > use/extend? Just curious. Having talked to Sven Mueller about this, he said that "one reason why I prefer spampd over amavisd-new is the better header tagging spamp

Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users

2004-10-05 Thread Marcel Hicking
--Tuesday, October 05, 2004 10:36:33 +0200 martin f krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > use amavisd-new or spampd. The latter seems to be better than > amavisd-new. What does "better" mean? Faster? More flexible? Easier to use/extend? Just curious. Cheers, Marcel pgpxHxlg5OIQM.pgp Description: PGP

Re: Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users

2004-10-05 Thread martin f krafft
also sprach Ben Vinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004.10.05.1018 +0200]: > How can I get a Postfix/Spamassassin server to also scan mails > that it is relaying (transporting) to other mail servers? At the > moment it is only scanning mails for local users. use amavisd-new or spampd. The latter seems t

Spamassassin only scanning mails for local users

2004-10-05 Thread Ben Vinger
Hi How can I get a Postfix/Spamassassin server to also scan mails that it is relaying (transporting) to other mail servers? At the moment it is only scanning mails for local users. Thanks Ben ___ALL-NEW