On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:18:12PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Em Qui, 2004-07-01 ?s 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > > >
> > >
> > > Although OpenVPN is
On Thu, Jul 01, 2004 at 07:18:12PM -0300, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Em Qui, 2004-07-01 ?s 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> > On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > > >
> > >
> > > Although OpenVPN is
Em Qui, 2004-07-01 às 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > >
> > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > >
> >
> > Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> > SSL tunneling, rather than
Em Qui, 2004-07-01 às 04:46, John Hedges escreveu:
> On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> > >
> > > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> > >
> >
> > Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> > SSL tunneling, rather than
;
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:32 PM
Subject: VPN
> Hi guys
>
> I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
> I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
>
> I've already listen about openvpn, openswan and raccon.
>
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> >
> > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> >
>
> Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
There is also the kernel support in 2.6. If y
t;
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 30, 2004 10:32 PM
Subject: VPN
> Hi guys
>
> I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
> I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
>
> I've already listen about openvpn, open
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 09:47:26PM -0700, Stephen Le wrote:
> >
> > I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
> >
>
> Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
> SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
There is also the kernel support in 2.6. If y
>
> I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
>
Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
>
> I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
>
Although OpenVPN is a really nice and easy to setup solution, it uses
SSL tunneling, rather than IPSEC encryption.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
greetings,
Kevin.
Paulo Ricardo wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
I've already listen about openvpn, openswan and raccon.
What do you s
Hi,
I think your should try openvpn http://www.openvpn.org .
greetings,
Kevin.
Paulo Ricardo wrote:
Hi guys
I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
I've already listen about openvpn, openswan and raccon.
What do you s
Hi guys
I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
I've already listen about openvpn, openswan and raccon.
What do you suggest in terms of this tools.
I intend to use IPSEC w/ linux accessing another linux
Hi guys
I would like to know what do you suggest in terms of IPSEC.
I used to deal with freeswan and I looking another solution.
I've already listen about openvpn, openswan and raccon.
What do you suggest in terms of this tools.
I intend to use IPSEC w/ linux accessing another linux
Hi
I am connecting two LAN's on internet using a VPN on two linux servers using
iptables. A part of the project is a security audit of the whole system, so I
must document that I've done some exhaustive attempts to break the security
and I've find everything O.K.
I don't kn
Hi
I am connecting two LAN's on internet using a VPN on two linux servers using
iptables. A part of the project is a security audit of the whole system, so I
must document that I've done some exhaustive attempts to break the security
and I've find everything O.K.
I don't kn
ing a few problems with setting up a VPN gateway on Linux,
> specifically a debian firewall box and having windows 2000
> boxes authenticate using certs.
>
> I have generated a cert for the gateway machine using the openssl packages
> and installed it. I have also configured fr
er use SSH Sentinel for
all Microsoft clients... But this URL might be able to point you to some help...
Regards,
Jeremy
On Sun, May 25, 2003 at 05:53:11PM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Hi Guys
>
> Having a few problems with setting up a VPN gateway on Linux,
> specifically
Hi Guys
Having a few problems with setting up a VPN gateway on Linux,
specifically a debian firewall box and having windows 2000
boxes authenticate using certs.
I have generated a cert for the gateway machine using the openssl packages
and installed it. I have also configured freeswan to the
Samuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> . IPSec + FreeSwan (which seems to be more secure)
What about cipe[1]?
> Suggestions and advices are welcome.
Cipe or IPSec (FreeSwan) depending on your actual setup.
Jens
Footnotes:
[1] http://http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/cipe.html
--
Samuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> . IPSec + FreeSwan (which seems to be more secure)
What about cipe[1]?
> Suggestions and advices are welcome.
Cipe or IPSec (FreeSwan) depending on your actual setup.
Jens
Footnotes:
[1] http://http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/cipe.html
--
Samuele, Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:51:36AM +0100:
> Hi there.
> I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
> have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
> the best implementation among:
>
> Suggestions and a
Samuele, Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:51:36AM +0100:
> Hi there.
> I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
> have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
> the best implementation among:
>
> Suggestions and a
My opinion: If you want to use reliable ipsec The only choice is FreeSwan/IPSec.
We could solve any problems with it (not so easy but works).
R.
Idézve: Dátum: 2003/3/19 11:51:36. Feladó: Samuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> Hi there.
>I have to set up a VPN service on some D
ation.
Imho pptpd should be avoided at all: i run it only to communicate with
an adsl modem (so i don't have any real life experience) and i'm not
really happy with it. Moreover it seems to be less reliable then the above.
Samuele wrote:
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service
My opinion: If you want to use reliable ipsec The only choice is FreeSwan/IPSec.
We could solve any problems with it (not so easy but works).
R.
Idézve: Dátum: 2003/3/19 11:51:36. Feladó: Samuele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
> Hi there.
>I have to set up a VPN service on some D
ation.
Imho pptpd should be avoided at all: i run it only to communicate with
an adsl modem (so i don't have any real life experience) and i'm not
really happy with it. Moreover it seems to be less reliable then the above.
Samuele wrote:
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service
Samuele wrote:
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
the best implementation among:
. SSH + PPPD (as explained in the VPN HOWTO)
. IPSec + FreeSwan (which
Samuele wrote:
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
the best implementation among:
. SSH + PPPD (as explained in the VPN HOWTO)
. IPSec + FreeSwan
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
the best implementation among:
. SSH + PPPD (as explained in the VPN HOWTO)
. IPSec + FreeSwan (which seems to be
Hi there.
I have to set up a VPN service on some Debian (woody) servers, and since I
have no experienced with this I am searching for advices and hints about
the best implementation among:
. SSH + PPPD (as explained in the VPN HOWTO)
. IPSec + FreeSwan (which seems to be
hello everybody!
i have a little problem here with my hardware dsl-router, on which i'd
like to have a Fli4l server running as VPN.
configurations were made with opt_vpnd, the Fli4l machine is able to
ping all local computers and internet.
all incoming packets are to be routed to the
hello everybody!
i have a little problem here with my hardware dsl-router, on which i'd
like to have a Fli4l server running as VPN.
configurations were made with opt_vpnd, the Fli4l machine is able to
ping all local computers and internet.
all incoming packets are to be routed to the
I made some Debian vpn notes for ipsec / freeswan here
http://www.thing.dyndns.org/debian/vpn.htm
Ive not played with freeswan since 2.4.14, but Im about to use it over
wireless
802.11barrrggg!
Its a bitch.
If anybody has a config for a debian laptop to a debian firewall and
On Sun, Aug 04, 2002 at 01:29:08AM +0800, axacheng wrote:
> i forgot one point!!!
>
> these package MUST free i dont have no money -_-
>
>
> Hello List :
>
> Does anyone knows What is best package on VPN solution
>
> That package have perfect securit
bió:
> > Hello List :
> >
> > Does anyone knows What is best package on VPN solution
> >
> > That package have perfect security , compatibility and friendly config
> > file for administrator!
> >
> Wahahahaha. NO!.
> 1.- FreeSWAN ---> IP
El sáb, 03-08-2002 a las 12:26, axacheng escribió:
> Hello List :
>
> Does anyone knows What is best package on VPN solution
>
> That package have perfect security , compatibility and friendly config file
> for administrator!
>
Wahahahaha. NO!.
1.- FreeSWAN
i forgot one point!!!
these package MUST free i dont have no money -_-
Hello List :
Does anyone knows What is best package on VPN solution
That package have perfect security , compatibility and friendly config file for
administrator!
pptpd is better than freeswan or have other
Hello List :
Does anyone knows What is best package on VPN solution
That package have perfect security , compatibility and friendly config file for
administrator!
pptpd is better than freeswan or have other good package?? @_@
BTW, where i could find good document or howto to
What do you want to do ?
Simply use your Debian box as a firewall or use it as a VPN-accessible host
?
In the first case, just follow the directions given by Brendan. It means
opening the correct ports in ipchains and forward to your VPN server.
In the second case, I have no experience of
t; >
> > But will this package implement GRE (port 47) ? Just because I need to
> > install the Linmux box as a firewall.
> > In fact it is already a fw. What I need is just to make VPN encapsulated
> > packets to go through the firewall to the VPN server which is lo
Hi Gregiore,
Gregoire Hostettler wrote:
> Thank you, Brendan,
>
> This is a good starting point.
>
> But will this package implement GRE (port 47) ? Just because I need to
> install the Linmux box as a firewall.
> In fact it is already a fw. What I need is just to
Thank you, Brendan,
This is a good starting point.
But will this package implement GRE (port 47) ? Just because I need to
install the Linmux box as a firewall.
In fact it is already a fw. What I need is just to make VPN encapsulated
packets to go through the firewall to the VPN server which is
Gregoire Hostettler wrote:
> Dear all,
>
>
>
> I hope I am posting to the right list, if not, I apologize...
>
>
>
> My problem is to setup a VPN between 4 W2K sites.
>
> I am using on regular basis Debian ipchains for firewalling, and so far
> it
Dear all,
I hope I am posting to the right list, if not, I
apologize...
My problem is to setup a VPN
between 4 W2K sites.
I am using on regular basis Debian ipchains for
firewalling, and so far it works great.
But now it is time to setup GRE, tunneling, L2TP
etc... And I cannot find a
On Tue, Jul 31, 2001 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 05:36:08PM +0200,
> Stephane Bortzmeyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 24
> lines which said:
>
> > I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs
> > to be safely encrypted
On Wed, Jul 11, 2001 at 11:52:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> I said that IPSec was probably the "best" way because it's
> a standard protocol, with companies such as Microsoft and
> Cisco supporting it
Well, to set up a tunnel, standar
DAP in woody is not SSLized anyway).
I finally choose stunnel+PPP. Both are available in Debian packages,
no patch to the Linux kernel is needed. I already know SSL and PPP,
and both are proven technologies.
www.stunnel.org
For the specific cas of a VPN,
http://www.stunnel.org/examples/pppvpn.
On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 01:46:58AM +1000, Jeff Waugh wrote:
>
>
> > The gateways can't ping eachother
>
> Please read the documentation -> the gateways will *not* be able to ping
> each other. FreeS/WAN only routes the traffic to and from each subnet behind
> the gateway.
Actually the gateways
> The gateways can't ping eachother
Please read the documentation -> the gateways will *not* be able to ping
each other. FreeS/WAN only routes the traffic to and from each subnet behind
the gateway.
- Jeff
--
Toothpaste is the most important meal of the day.
--
Hello,
I don't know if this is the best mailinglist to post my question, if
not.. sorry for the inconvenience.
Anyway, my situation:
-- masq.boxA -- internet -- masq.boxB --
masq.boxA, runs the FreeSWAN daemon
eth0 = 213.51.32.x. ip (routeable)
ipsec0 is binded to eth0
eth1 = 192.168.1.1
m
my Gaddis
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to d
remy Gaddis
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (a VPN)
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why
I would choose one above th
nters.
> If this is not feasible or you want to do it yourself, start reading.
I've found already many documents, which I mentioned in my first
message. The problem is that there is almost no comprehensive
comparison.
> Here is an intro to VPN
> http://www.synthcom.com/
On Tue, Jul 10, 2001 at 11:25:24AM -0500,
Jeremy Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
a message of 42 lines which said:
> Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
Why? (This is a real question: I see *many* solutions but I wonder why
I would choose one above th
nters.
> If this is not feasible or you want to do it yourself, start reading.
I've found already many documents, which I mentioned in my first
message. The problem is that there is almost no comprehensive
comparison.
> Here is an intro to VPN
> http://www.synthcom.com/
/pipermail/design/
Using:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/
Briefs:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/briefs/
Here is an intro to VPN
http://www.synthcom.com/~val/cs510/termpaper.htm
-Ted Knab
Senior Otaku
Breezy Network Solutions
On Tue, Jul 10
the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
> make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
>
> - I tried pipsecd + userlink. The userlink module seems severely
> broken, at least with kernel 2.4. A simple ifconfig stays in D 'disk
> wait' forever!
>
> - ssh + ppp
Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
FreeS/WAN (http://www.freeswan.org) is a Linux implementation
of IPSec, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to
configure.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Stepha
the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
> make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
See Linux FreeS/WAN [http://www.freeswan.org/intro.html].
Ciao
Charl
__
I'm not closed-mi
I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs to
be safely encrypted (some users know SSH but some will just POP
blindly and LDAP in woody is not SSLized anyway).
I wonder what is the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
- I
/pipermail/design/
Using:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/users/
Briefs:
http://lists.freeswan.org/pipermail/briefs/
Here is an intro to VPN
http://www.synthcom.com/~val/cs510/termpaper.htm
-Ted Knab
Senior Otaku
Breezy Network Solutions
On Tue, Jul
the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
> make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
>
> - I tried pipsecd + userlink. The userlink module seems severely
> broken, at least with kernel 2.4. A simple ifconfig stays in D 'disk
> wait' forever!
>
> - ssh
Using an IPSec VPN is probably the "best" way to do it.
FreeS/WAN (http://www.freeswan.org) is a Linux implementation
of IPSec, but it's not the easiest thing in the world to
configure.
j.
--
Jeremy L. Gaddis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: Stepha
the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
> make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
See Linux FreeS/WAN [http://www.freeswan.org/intro.html].
Ciao
Charl
__
I'm not closed-mi
I have to connect two networks together and the virtual link needs to
be safely encrypted (some users know SSH but some will just POP
blindly and LDAP in woody is not SSLized anyway).
I wonder what is the recommended way to setup an encrypted tunnel (to
make a VPN) between two Debian boxes:
- I
e tunneling in the kernel. The how to does
> not mention that i have to enable it but it does mention that pptp works
> through this protocol..so anyone has had experience with this
> kind of trouble?
Are you using the VPN Masquerade patch?
It can be found at:
ftp://f
My fellow debian hackers, isps and the like:
There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
consistently folowed the how-to on the matter. I used ipf
ed gre tunneling in the kernel. The how to does
> not mention that i have to enable it but it does mention that pptp works
> through this protocol..so anyone has had experience with this
> kind of trouble?
Are you using the VPN Masquerade patch?
It can be found at:
ftp://f
My fellow debian hackers, isps and the like:
There is some strange behaviour upon masqarading a pptp connection to a
win2k server holding some erp services and stuff.
Basically, the damned firewall is not masqing the pptp traffic and i
consistently folowed the how-to on the matter. I used ip
I have a Debian potato box where I want to offer Windows users VPN access.
I installed PPTP, patched pppd 2.3.10 for mschap, - but from Win98, VPN will only work
if all encryption is disabled. The "dun40.exe" mentioned in the PoPToP howto refused
to upgrade the Win98 system I used t
Tim,
Take a look at http://www.xs4all.nl/~freeswan/
It's an open source ipsec compliant VPN server. You apply it as a patch
to the Linux kernel. It's not packaged because it's a kernel patch, not
just a binary.
Luca
These links will help:
http://www.freeswan.org/freeswan_tre
'Lo Folks,
In an effort to expand our VPN services, I'm looking at any opensource
VPN solution I can find to replace our Shiva box. What I'd love to see
is to be able to set up a Linux box with the VPN server software running
on it, and to have IPSec compliant clients (wintel,
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 05:15:20PM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
> As I stated in my first message on this thread, diald does not work
> with tunnelv.
I noted that. I'm willing to experiment to see if I can make them play
together. Thanks for the pointers to RFTM!
bob
--
bob
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 05:15:20PM +0200, I. Forbes wrote:
> As I stated in my first message on this thread, diald does not work
> with tunnelv.
I noted that. I'm willing to experiment to see if I can make them play
together. Thanks for the pointers to RFTM!
bob
--
bob
what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
--
kc
Kevin Conover: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
pipsecd
what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
--
kc
Kevin Conover: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject o
rner
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: I. Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:54 PM
> > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: RE: VPN recomendations
> >
> >
> > Hello All
> >
> &g
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
pipsecd
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &qu
@lists.debian.org
> Subject: RE: VPN recomendations
>
>
> Hello All
>
> Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It
> is quite neat and totally secure.
>
> But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the
> ethertap dev
ay, September 14, 2000 7:42 AM
> > To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> > Subject: VPN recomendations
> >
> >
> > was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between
> > linux servers in
> > different places to establish a small private n
>
> Werner
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: I. Forbes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2000 12:54 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: VPN recomendations
> >
> >
> > Hello All
> >
> &g
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: VPN recomendations
>
>
> Hello All
>
> Tunnelv is a userland package that works via the ethertap device. It
> is quite neat and totally secure.
>
> But it has a bug that conflicts with diald. Diald will also use the
> ethertap device i
p://www.worldvisions.ca/tunnelv/) for 18 months
> now. It is easy to configure and it works very reliable. And there is a
> debian package "tunnelv".
>
> Werner
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kim O [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Thursday, Sep
er 14, 2000 7:42 AM
> To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
> Subject: VPN recomendations
>
>
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between
> linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:58:15PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> > was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> > different places to establish a small private network over public
> > inf
ember 14, 2000 7:42 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: VPN recomendations
>
>
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between
> linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
CIPE - packaged, is
was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
different places to establish a small private network over public
infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
thanks
Kim
On Wed, Sep 13, 2000 at 10:58:15PM -0700, Luca Filipozzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> > was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> > different places to establish a small private network over public
>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 01:42:26AM -0400, Kim O wrote:
> was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
> different places to establish a small private network over public
> infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
CIPE - packaged, is
was just wondering what the best way is to do VPN between linux servers in
different places to establish a small private network over public
infrastructure. packages,software or howtos appreciated.
thanks
Kim
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubs
94 matches
Mail list logo
