On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> Hello,
Hi !
> should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
> BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure
> out which user it is by the server-name they are using ie
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:21:22AM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> their logins. but i dont want to use the linux auth for pop/imap/mta. Im
> expecting to have several hundred email addresses with only a few (10-20)
> for ssh. Id rather not fill my passwd file with junk. Is this possible? =)
If
On Sat, Dec 22, 2001 at 02:21:22AM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> their logins. but i dont want to use the linux auth for pop/imap/mta. Im
> expecting to have several hundred email addresses with only a few (10-20)
> for ssh. Id rather not fill my passwd file with junk. Is this possible? =)
I
Thanks everyone for the input, was very helpful...
That was my first post, and im very impressed ;)... Thanks guys for all the
tips.
-Matt
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:07, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> > should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
> > BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out
> > which user it is by the server-name they are using ie 'mail.client1.com'
> > or
>
> That is not
Thanks everyone for the input, was very helpful...
That was my first post, and im very impressed ;)... Thanks guys for all the
tips.
-Matt
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Walkup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting for Email
> Thanks for the replies Jeremy...
>
> Well thats what I was looking for, and I figured that about the POP3 (kind
>
On Sat, 22 Dec 2001 11:07, Jeremy Lunn wrote:
> > should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should
> > BOTH be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out
> > which user it is by the server-name they are using ie 'mail.client1.com'
> > or
>
> That is not
> 1) Im wondering if this is possible, or what is the next-best solution.
No. nor POP nor IMAP support HTTP 'Host: ' like constructions
Next best thing: let your users login as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Frank
- Original Message -
From: "Matthew Walkup" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 5:21 AM
Subject: RE: Virtual Hosting for Email
> Thanks for the replies Jeremy...
>
> Well thats what I was looking for, and I figured that a
> 1) Im wondering if this is possible, or what is the next-best solution.
No. nor POP nor IMAP support HTTP 'Host: ' like constructions
Next best thing: let your users login as [EMAIL PROTECTED] or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ...
Frank
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should BOTH
> be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out which
> user it is by the server-nam
--disabled-password and
authenticate with a htpasswd file).
Thanks again for any more insight,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:07 AM
To: Matthew Walkup
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosting for
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> a small client base now, so I think it should be alright). So I need a
> smtp/pop package that is light-weight, and doesnt have much overhead. The
Postfix is a great MTA (Mail Transfer Agent). I don't know hich pop
package would
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]and
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> should be treated as seperate accounts. AND the account logins should BOTH
> be just 'webmaster', and the pop server should be able to figure out which
> user it is by the server-na
--disabled-password and
authenticate with a htpasswd file).
Thanks again for any more insight,
Matt
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Lunn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2001 2:07 AM
To: Matthew Walkup
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Virtual Hosting for Email
On
On Fri, Dec 21, 2001 at 11:01:08PM -0800, Matthew Walkup wrote:
> a small client base now, so I think it should be alright). So I need a
> smtp/pop package that is light-weight, and doesnt have much overhead. The
Postfix is a great MTA (Mail Transfer Agent). I don't know hich pop
package would
Hello,
I appologize in advanced, this may seem easy to most of you =).
In the coming weeks, my small hosting company will be moving from our
out-sourced server to our own and there is only one issue that I have yet to
figure out a solution to.
We have 1 ip, 1 server (with all services running on
Hello,
I appologize in advanced, this may seem easy to most of you =).
In the coming weeks, my small hosting company will be moving from our
out-sourced server to our own and there is only one issue that I have yet to
figure out a solution to.
We have 1 ip, 1 server (with all services running o
19 matches
Mail list logo
