s the last option), I must build it any time I want
to upgrade webalizer. That should be no prob, but I prefer not to compile.
I think my users will have no prob with english stats :P
Thanks anyway! :)
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2003 20:21, Stephan Poehlsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> you h
s the last option), I must build it any time I want
to upgrade webalizer. That should be no prob, but I prefer not to compile.
I think my users will have no prob with english stats :P
Thanks anyway! :)
El Miércoles, 2 de Abril de 2003 20:21, Stephan Poehlsen escribió:
> Hi,
>
> you h
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
Hi,
you have to get the sources
apt-get source webalizer
and edit the file
emacs webalizer-2.01.10/debian/rules
in line 7 you can find the configure line for th new debian packages,
add
--with-language=german
or another language. Then build the package
cd webalizer-2.01.10
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I were using a compiled version of webalizer, but now I'm using Debian, and
I'd like to use the Debian package for Webalizer. I've installed it, but I
don't know how to use the language support. I read in README this could be
Currently, for woody at least, it seems that this is done by a cron job
located in /etc/cron.daily
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew P. Kaplan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Debian-Isp" ; "Jeremy C. Reed"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2
>>Tell us how and when webalizer is ran.
That's the problem I can't figure out what makes webalizer run. I see a
logrotate script at midnight. The webpages and .png files have current dates
and are being updated daily. So webalizer *must* be running. But the stats
displayed stop
in stead of of "-i", i mean "-o" for the output
directory... sry.
regards,
tobias kuhrmann
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Tobias Kuhrmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Sonntag, 28. Juli 2002 03:40
An: 'Jeremy C. Reed'; 'Andrew P. Kaplan'
even i have some trouble with my webalizer stats
one of of our hostings is not analyzed right!
the webalizer is displaying not the real stats, the apache
logfiles determine. only the traffic display is right.
i use webalizer with:
webalizer -i -p -n -r -p
anyone got a solution for my
On Sat, 27 Jul 2002, Andrew P. Kaplan wrote:
> I having problem with webalizer since the ip address of my Apache server was
> changed last week. Apache is rotating the logs, the logs have current dates.
> But the website stats only show activity up to the day of OLD ip address. I
> d
I having problem with webalizer since the ip address of my Apache server was
changed last week. Apache is rotating the logs, the logs have current dates.
But the website stats only show activity up to the day of OLD ip address. I
don't care if the last few days of July are lost. But I want A
ccess logs under different ownership and group attribution -- thus
preventing both Webalizer and Analog from reading access.log, and
providing the usual report, and necessitating manual intervention to
change ownership. (Which fixes the problem.)
Anyone got a permanent fix for this behaviour?
(Or,
> I can't suggest alternative loggers, but one of the reasons that
> my webalizer kept breaking is because I had logrotate in the
> /etc/cron.daily as well. l comes before w. I changed the name of
> the logrotate script to 'zlogrotate' and webalizer hasn't had a
&g
>
> Hi,
> i'm looking for a web-log analyzer for potato and multiple virtual hosts.
> webalizer keeps breaking (didn't create stats for some days, and then starts
> again...),
> analog is ugly, ...
> and all need plain text log.
I can't suggest alternative
> Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is that, AFAIK, it'll trash your history for
> that year (could be wrong...)
Actually, the repaired .deb package has made it to proposed updates in
stable and apt-get update, apt-get upgrade will install the fixed
package.
The README.1st file has a few, simple
> Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is that, AFAIK, it'll trash your history for
> that year (could be wrong...)
Actually, the repaired .deb package has made it to proposed updates in
stable and apt-get update, apt-get upgrade will install the fixed
package.
The README.1st file has a few, simple
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:51:43AM +0200, James wrote:
>
> bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
Yup. It ignores records after 20011004.
> floating about...
Indeed. It's available on www.webalizer.org. Can't remember quite there.
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is t
On Thu, Oct 18, 2001 at 10:51:43AM +0200, James wrote:
>
> bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
Yup. It ignores records after 20011004.
> floating about...
Indeed. It's available on www.webalizer.org. Can't remember quite there.
Hassle with upgrading to 2.0 is
bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
floating about...
James
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Craig wrote:
> Hi Fellas
>
> Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
> of records in my apache log files ?
>
> Any help would be g
Hi Fellas
Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
of records in my apache log files ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Craig
bug in 1.30 version, uodate to 2.0 is a solution or there is a patch
floating about...
James
On Thu, 18 Oct 2001, Craig wrote:
> Hi Fellas
>
> Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
> of records in my apache log files ?
>
> Any help would be g
Hi Fellas
Can anyone tell me why webalizer 1.30 is ignoring hugh amounts
of records in my apache log files ?
Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:30, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> > re-read all the apache log files ?
> >
> > Even the gunzipped ones ?
>
> Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
> one by one on the co
On Mon, 15 Oct 2001 11:30, Marcin Sochacki wrote:
> > Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> > re-read all the apache log files ?
> >
> > Even the gunzipped ones ?
>
> Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
> one by one on the co
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Hi debian community
>
> Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> re-read all the apache log files ?
>
> Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on th
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Somebody please test and report :) I still have no potato box around
> for extensive testing, unfortunately.
I just installed it from "proposed updates" and it is running fine on my
potato box. But it I have not done "extensive testing".
btw - thank
On Mon, Oct 15, 2001 at 10:16:41AM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Hi debian community
>
> Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> re-read all the apache log files ?
>
> Even the gunzipped ones ?
Remove the webalizer.current file and then specify all the logfiles,
one by one on th
Craig wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> re-read all the apache log files ?
>
for a in /var/log/apache/access.log*; do webalizer $a; done
?
regards,
Remco.
--
:: Remco van de Meent
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
Hi debian community
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
..Craig
Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Somebody please test and report :) I still have no potato box around
> for extensive testing, unfortunately.
I just installed it from "proposed updates" and it is running fine on my
potato box. But it I have not done "extensive testing".
btw - th
Craig wrote:
>
> Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
> re-read all the apache log files ?
>
for a in /var/log/apache/access.log*; do webalizer $a; done
?
regards,
Remco.
--
:: Remco van de Meent
:: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:: http://remco.vandemeent.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
Hi debian community
Does anyone know how to get webalizer to
re-read all the apache log files ?
Even the gunzipped ones ?
..Craig
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tilmann Holst wrote:
> Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put
> > it up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in
> > the potato archive however.
I just put them online: http://people.debian.org/~remco
Tilmann Holst wrote:
> Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> > I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put
> > it up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in
> > the potato archive however.
I just put them online: http://people.debian.org/~re
Remco van de Meent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
> up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
> potato archive however.
Is it possible to put it into "proposed-updates"?
--
Tilmann Holst - TUCCO - the uni
Remco van de Meent [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
> up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
> potato archive however.
Is it possible to put it into "proposed-updates"?
--
Tilmann Holst - TUCCO - the
various people wrote:
[webalizer-1.30.4 from potato is badly broken, starting Oct 5, 2001]
[there is a fix from the upstream author]
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato
various people wrote:
[webalizer-1.30.4 from potato is badly broken, starting Oct 5, 2001]
[there is a fix from the upstream author]
I'll make a new package available in the next few days and I'll put it
up for download on some debian.org machine. You won't find in the
potato
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
>
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> > > Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
> > > &
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> > Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
> > > > (Linux 2.2.12) English. I have several websites
> > > > r
Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each half hour. On Octobe
On Wed, 10 Oct 2001, Marcel Hicking wrote:
> Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
>
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> > > Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
> > > &
Cameron Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 8 Oct 2001, at 15:52:
> * [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> > Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04
> > > > (Linux 2.2.12) English. I have several websites
> > >
Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each half hour. On Octobe
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Maybe someone can grab the sources for the webalizer package from
> woody (i.e. webalizer version 2.01.6-something) and recompile it on
> potato (don't know if it works out of the box), and see if that works?
Ye
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 10:30:02PM +0200, Remco van de Meent wrote:
> Maybe someone can grab the sources for the webalizer package from
> woody (i.e. webalizer version 2.01.6-something) and recompile it on
> potato (don't know if it works out of the box), and see if that works?
Ye
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config fil
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
> I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cameron Moore wrote:
> > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > cron to run: webalizer -c each half hour. O
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
>I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
>apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
>Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
>First one to figur
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ig
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/a
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
> daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
> 26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new o
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Martin Man wrote:
> since the beginning of september I'm sometimes getting something like
> from webalizer, though I haven't look at it
Same here. In my case, these were requests by the Code Red-type worm.
I am guessing that there is a config option to allow
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
20,000 hits
Hi.
A workaround is to change the epoch from 1/1/1990 to 1/1/2000 in the
webalizer.c sources and recompile. Credits go to Mait Vares.
Anyone know if the number of seconds from 1/1/1990 till 5/10/2001 is
something like 10^x or 2^y ? :-)
regards,
Remco.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PR
Take a look at your webalizer.current file. The second line will be
the date of the last record processed. Webalizer will not process any
files before that date to prevent duplication. I have manually changed
the date to process older log files with success.
Pete Billson
--
http
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 15:36]:
> Cameron Moore wrote:
> > > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config fil
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:01:16PM -0700, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
>
> I am guessing that there is a config option to allow longer requests. (But
> I don't see it in my manual page.)
I don't think so. I remember I had to patch it and recompile.
Marcin
--
Marcin Owsiany <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cameron Moore wrote:
> > I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12)
> > English. I have several websites running on my server using
> > Apache/1.3.9 (Unix), each site with its own config file. I have a
> > cron to run: webalizer -c each half hour.
At 03:15 PM 10/8/01 -0500, Cameron Moore wrote:
>I'm seeing the exact same problem (same version of webalizer but newer
>apache). Nothing was changed on the box -- it just stopped working.
>Plenty of resources (disk, memory, etc). Seems like a webalizer bug.
>First one
Hello,
After looking this problem over some more, it seems it just ignores
changes, I removed the webalizer.current file, re-ran webalizer and it
got todays stats, but when I put back my original webalizer.current file
an re-ran webalizer again it doesn't change anything, instead it ig
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2001.10.08 13:44]:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
> each
Yes,
I did a tail -f /var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log and I can
see traffic coming to the site.
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
>
>
>>daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
>>
>
> Are the transfers really being recor
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Matt Fair wrote:
> daily stats, nothing. Apache is still recording the transfer logs, and
Are the transfers really being recorded to
/var/log/apache/virtual/opensimpx/transfer.log?
> 26 records (26 ignored) in 0.00 seconds
This looks like it has 26 old entries but no new
On Mon, 8 Oct 2001, Martin Man wrote:
> since the beginning of september I'm sometimes getting something like
> from webalizer, though I haven't look at it
Same here. In my case, these were requests by the Code Red-type worm.
I am guessing that there is a config option
On Mon, Oct 08, 2001 at 01:32:59PM -0600, Matt Fair wrote:
> Hello,
> I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
> I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
> each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run:
Hello,
I am using Debian Stable with Webalizer V1.30-04 (Linux 2.2.12) English.
I have several websites running on my server using Apache/1.3.9 (Unix),
each site with its own config file. I have a cron to run: webalizer -c
each half hour. On October 4th one of my sites got about
20,000
out
goodies am I going to get that will persuade me to roll my own before
>= v2.01 makes it into testing?)
I'm hoping it will help me...my webalizer gets an error about strings being too long.
Rob...
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
akes it into testing?)
I reckon: http://mrunix.net/webalizer/news.html :)
- Jeff
--
"You know, the crunchy, folk-singer part of me wants to believe that a
performance is a dialogue, but I can't hear a fucking thing you're
saying." - Ani
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 09:24, Craig wrote:
> Hey debian community
>
> I have just install webalizer 1.30 on my web server box
> so our web designers can analyze traffic to and from
> their websites. I have a combined log for all our sites
> but it doesn't look like webalizer
On Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 03:28:00PM +0200, Craig wrote:
> Nothing, thats what i used, only thing is its version 1.30
> whereas if you download the source its 2.01 >
You could also download the source from testing... in my box I've compiled it and it
is 2.1.6.
Just my $2 cents.
--
:wq
--
Sellar
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Craig wrote:
> only thing is its version 1.30
> whereas if you download the source its 2.01 >
Ah -- OK. Thanks for clueing me in -- I hadn't realised.
Is the difference worth it? (I.e. what can't-possibly-do-without
goodies am I going to get that will persuade me to roll
AIL PROTECTED]; Craig
Subject: Re: Webalizer
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jean Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> "I'm feeling lucky" with query "webalizer" on google.com gave me
> http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
So what's wrong with : "apt-get install webal
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Jean Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> "I'm feeling lucky" with query "webalizer" on google.com gave me
> http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
So what's wrong with : "apt-get install webalizer" then?
--
Martin Wheeler
--
To
Hi,
n Tue, Aug 28, 2001 at 08:55:24AM -0400, Peter Kok wrote:
> Hi all
>
> Could you let me know where I can download the webalizer on the internet?
"I'm feeling lucky" with query "webalizer" on google.com gave me
http://www.mrunix.net/webalizer/
O>
Hi all
Could you let me know where I can download the webalizer on the internet?
Tks
Regards
Peter
Rob Woodward wrote:
> Hi,
>
> One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
> I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
>
&g
At 08:23 28/08/01 +0100, Rob Woodward wrote:
>Hi,
>
>One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
>I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
My 2 cents :
for arf in `find /opt/web/web2/home/*/logs/access_log`
do
$WEBALIZE
Hi,
One method I used was to use a different config file for each vitual host
I had on the box. Each vitual host has a different log file too.
Cheers,
Rob
On Tue, 28 Aug 2001, Craig wrote:
> Hey debian community
>
> I have just install webalizer 1.30 on my web server box
>
Hey debian community
I have just install webalizer 1.30 on my web server box
so our web designers can analyze traffic to and from
their websites. I have a combined log for all our sites
but it doesn't look like webalizer is giving a statistical
by site break-down. Does anyone know if weba
eff S Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
such
Jeff S Wheeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Mai 2001 00:29
An: z-deb-isp
Betreff: RE: Webalizer and net-acct differences
The header size is not so fixed, actually. If you use cookies on your site
the client will send them to you upon each request. You might have CGIs and
th automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
> >files and reporting them in some other format?
>
> the answer ist simple: Paranoia. :)
> Webalizer crashed several times and we lost all statistics (didn't keept
> the lof-files so long).
That's bad. No backups?
>
th automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
> >files and reporting them in some other format?
>
> the answer ist simple: Paranoia. :)
> Webalizer crashed several times and we lost all statistics (didn't keept
> the lof-files so long).
That's bad. No backups?
>
and
not what webalizer/etc reports, you and your customer should both understand
the differences.
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Bougues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Nicolas Bougues
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Andreas Rabus
Cc: 'Russell Coker'; Debia
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
> and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon the kind
and
not what webalizer/etc reports, you and your customer should both understand
the differences.
- jsw
-Original Message-
From: Nicolas Bougues [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Nicolas Bougues
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2001 4:56 PM
To: Andreas Rabus
Cc: 'Russell Coker'; De
> Back to questioning:
> recently i did some calculation and find out that webalizer results are
> about about 85% of the net-acct results.
> Ist that an realistic overhead form http-headers, ICMP (on or to port 80?),
> and TCP/IP frame info, etc.?
Yes. But it depends upon t
hi,
>Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
>the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
>
>What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
>files and reporting them in som
n and any ICMP messages that may be required.
What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files and reporting them in some other format?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP ben
hi,
>Not only will it not report the size of the http headers, but it won't
report
>the TCP and IP frame information and any ICMP messages that may be
required.
>
>What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
>files and reporting them in som
n and any ICMP messages that may be required.
What is the problem with automatically sucking the sizes out of webalizer
files and reporting them in some other format?
--
http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark
http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP ben
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
> packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number
hi,
for our accounting i tried to write a script that uses net-acct (an
user-space daemon to log all network traffic over an net-device) to collect
the webtraffic for our customer.
Until now we use webalizer and read the monthly sums in his report, but that
is'nt a nice job, so i tried
> Anbody knows what is loggend in the Apache log in the field size (i.e.
> included HTTP Header or not) , and what does net-acct take for the size of a
> packet (just the payload, or the headers too?)
>From the Apache docs @
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/mod/mod_log_common.html
bytes
The number
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
