Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread Peter Billson
Ward, Yes, it really does work for me. I thought the point of the original poster is that he wanted any address that didn't match a real user (and I assume another alias) to be delivered to a particular mailbox. He wanted the alias file to never fail. The original poster didn't mention that

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread Peter Billson
Ward, Yes, it really does work for me. I thought the point of the original poster is that he wanted any address that didn't match a real user (and I assume another alias) to be delivered to a particular mailbox. He wanted the alias file to never fail. The original poster didn't mention tha

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread Ward Willats
Pete: In your alias file, as your last rule, put *: username Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run any aliases generated by other rules in the fil

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread Ward Willats
Pete: >In your alias file, as your last rule, put > >*: username > Does that really work for you? I had trouble with it because with a line like this, the alias file can never fail. Exim would qualify "username" and run it through again, it would also run any aliases generated by other rules i

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread brad
Can anyone tell me how you'd do same in postfix? b. On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 11:31, Peter Billson wrote: > In your alias file, as your last rule, put > > *: username > > where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be > a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Pete

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread Peter Billson
In your alias file, as your last rule, put *: username where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting Bernie Berg wro

Re: exim question

2002-02-21 Thread brad
Can anyone tell me how you'd do same in postfix? b. On Thu, 2002-02-21 at 11:31, Peter Billson wrote: > In your alias file, as your last rule, put > > *: username > > where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be > a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Pete

Re: exim question

2002-02-20 Thread Peter Billson
In your alias file, as your last rule, put *: username where username is the account the mail should goto. Username can also be a remote address i.e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pete -- http://www.elbnet.com ELB Internet Services, Inc. Web Design, Computer Consulting, Internet Hosting Bernie Berg wr

Re: exim question

2002-02-20 Thread Ward Willats
At 6:30 PM -0600 2/20/02, Bernie Berg wrote: im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 1. An alias file: system_aliases: driver = al

exim question

2002-02-20 Thread Bernie Berg
im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" thanks! bernie

Re: exim question

2002-02-20 Thread Ward Willats
At 6:30 PM -0600 2/20/02, Bernie Berg wrote: >im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to >spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail >box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to >"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" 1. An alias file: system_aliases: driver

exim question

2002-02-20 Thread Bernie Berg
im running potato with the unstable packages. How do I get exim to spit all mail that there isn't a user defined for to a certain mail box? so "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" goes to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" thanks! bernie -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> I tried to tweak exim.conf, adding a couple of sites under > "relay_domains". BTW - Be sure to remove the entries you made here or you will have an open mail relay to these domains (which is Bad). Pete PS You may want to verify this information as I have been known not to be a reliable source!

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> > There was no file resolve.conf in /etc, so I created one with the following > > That should be 'resolv.conf'. No 'e'. Arrggg. I'm very embarrassed! I hope I didn't cause you too much teeth gnashing! :-( As punishment I've been sentenced to install Unix Servic

Re: Newbie from NT exim question SOLVED

2001-05-02 Thread Caracal - G. Hostettler
quot;Aaron Ghent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:33 PM Subject: Re: Newbie from NT exim question > > Thank you for your answer, but.. > > > > There was no file resolve.conf in /etc, so I created one with the following >

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Ilya Martynov
GH> I guess it is maybe related to DNS. My simple problem is "where in GH> the hell do I specify the DNS primary and secondary IP addresses GH> under Debian Linux ?" Edit /etc/resolv.conf. It should look like nameserver PRIMARY_DNS_IP nameserver SECONDARY_DNS_IP See 'man resolv.conf' for more d

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Aaron Ghent
il travaux généraux : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > e-mail travaux webmaster : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > e-mail personnel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gregory Hostettler" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Caracal - G. Hostettler
PROTECTED] e-mail personnel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gregory Hostettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Newbie from NT exim question > > I gue

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> I tried to tweak exim.conf, adding a couple of sites under > "relay_domains". BTW - Be sure to remove the entries you made here or you will have an open mail relay to these domains (which is Bad). Pete PS You may want to verify this information as I have been known not to be a reliable source

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> I guess it is maybe related to DNS. My simple problem is "where in the > hell do I specify the DNS primary and secondary IP addresses under > Debian Linux /etc/resolve.conf which should look like: search yourdomain.com nameserver 192.168.2.3 nameserver 192.168.3.4 Pete -- http://www.elbnet.co

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> > There was no file resolve.conf in /etc, so I created one with the following > > That should be 'resolv.conf'. No 'e'. Arrggg. I'm very embarrassed! I hope I didn't cause you too much teeth gnashing! :-( As punishment I've been sentenced to install Unix Servi

Re: Newbie from NT exim question SOLVED

2001-05-02 Thread Caracal - G. Hostettler
From: "Aaron Ghent" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 9:33 PM Subject: Re: Newbie from NT exim question > > Thank you for your answer, but.. > > > > There was no file resolve.conf in /etc, so I created one with the follow

Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Gregory Hostettler
Hi!   My brand-new exim on potato kernel 2.2.13 used to work perfectly for some days. Just before (what a chance!) to go production, it stopped working on outgoing e-mails, with this nasty message: '550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator (failed to find host name from

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Ilya Martynov
GH> I guess it is maybe related to DNS. My simple problem is "where in GH> the hell do I specify the DNS primary and secondary IP addresses GH> under Debian Linux ?" Edit /etc/resolv.conf. It should look like nameserver PRIMARY_DNS_IP nameserver SECONDARY_DNS_IP See 'man resolv.conf' for more

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Aaron Ghent
il travaux généraux : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > e-mail travaux webmaster : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > e-mail personnel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > - Original Message - > From: "Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Gregory Hostettler" <[EMAIL PR

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Caracal - G. Hostettler
PROTECTED] e-mail personnel : [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: "Tech Support" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gregory Hostettler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2001 8:27 PM Subject: Re: Newbie from NT exim q

Re: Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Tech Support
> I guess it is maybe related to DNS. My simple problem is "where in the > hell do I specify the DNS primary and secondary IP addresses under > Debian Linux /etc/resolve.conf which should look like: search yourdomain.com nameserver 192.168.2.3 nameserver 192.168.3.4 Pete -- http://www.elbnet.c

Newbie from NT exim question

2001-05-02 Thread Gregory Hostettler
Hi!   My brand-new exim on potato kernel 2.2.13 used to work perfectly for some days. Just before (what a chance!) to go production, it stopped working on outgoing e-mails, with this nasty message: '550 relaying to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> prohibited by administrator (failed to find host name from

exim question

2001-03-09 Thread KOZMAN Balint
Hi, i use exim to do some address revision on outgoing mails. Does anyone know if exim can rewrite the disposition notification line as described in rfc2298, 'cos i haven't found any rewrite flags for this feature. Regards, Balint

exim question

2001-03-09 Thread KOZMAN Balint
Hi, i use exim to do some address revision on outgoing mails. Does anyone know if exim can rewrite the disposition notification line as described in rfc2298, 'cos i haven't found any rewrite flags for this feature. Regards, Balint -- To UNSUBSCRIB