Re: trouble with zebra ( WAS RE: gated on woody )

2002-04-24 Thread Michael Wood
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 02:56:12PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Yep, I did so, but I'm running into problems. > Everything looks good for about 10 min. then I > loose connectivity to the loopback of my Linux box, > but the route stay's in the Cisco's route table. > After pinging from Cisco to

Re: trouble with zebra ( WAS RE: gated on woody )

2002-04-22 Thread Jean-Francois Dive
192.168.99.249/32 area 0 > ! > > > Can someone out some light on me ? > > > Thanks, > > Daniel > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Michael Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:18 PM > > To: [EMAIL

trouble with zebra ( WAS RE: gated on woody )

2002-04-22 Thread Daniel.Marquez-Klaka
92.168.99.16/28 area 0 network 192.168.99.249/32 area 0 ! Can someone out some light on me ? Thanks, Daniel > -Original Message- > From: Michael Wood [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 4:18 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: gated on woody &

Re: gated on woody

2002-04-19 Thread Michael Wood
On Fri, Apr 19, 2002 at 01:53:37PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hiya, > > I'm trying to get gated working on an fresh installed woody. > It compiles with no errors but I can't even bring gated to > check his conf file (-C). All I get is an simple "Abort". > > I'm still on the default instal

Re: gated on woody

2002-04-19 Thread Alexander List
On Fri, 19 Apr 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'm trying to get gated working on an fresh installed woody. > It compiles with no errors but I can't even bring gated to check > his conf file (-C). All I get is an simple "Abort". Have you tried to strace it to find out why it aborts? Alex --

gated on woody

2002-04-19 Thread Daniel.Marquez-Klaka
Hiya, I'm trying to get gated working on an fresh installed woody. It compiles with no errors but I can't even bring gated to check his conf file (-C). All I get is an simple "Abort". I'm still on the default installation Kernel. My question now is there something in the kernel that need to be t