hi clement luca, thanks for your responses.
i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded
when i try to use it.
as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we
transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve
this shortcoming
hi clement luca, thanks for your responses.
i did include ingress shaping as a module, and it's automagically loaded
when i try to use it.
as luca said, the LARTC-howto states we can only 'shape data we
transmit', but it was my believe that ingress shaping was there to solve
this shortcoming
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get
R.M. Evers wrote:
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping, but i cant get
R.M. Evers wrote:
hi everyone,
thanx for the tips om my last traffic shaping question. i've managed to
get a debian bridge (ebtables / bridge-nf patched 2.4.22 kernel w/
newest 'tc') up and running which does firewalling and outgoing shaping.
now, i wanted to try the incoming ingress shaping
6 matches
Mail list logo