Previously Russell Coker wrote:
Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
It's online now at ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/wichert/ . It has
all the magic that apt needs to download binary and source packages.
I also split the archive in two sections:
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:40, Neale Banks wrote:
I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository for
such things and manage them properly...
They're possibly the ones at
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
They should appear at ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/wichert/
somewhere in the next 30 hours.
Please note that I do expect everyone who uses them to subscribe
to the va-debian-users
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
[...]
Then starts the slippery slope... the libldap2 in unstable depends on
libsasl7, which in its turn recommends libsasl-modules (the only
consolation here is that libsasl7 etc is also in
On Tuesday 13 March 2001 11:40, Neale Banks wrote:
I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository for
such things and manage them properly...
They're possibly the ones at
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
I pretty much have everything ready to go. There are two bugs I would like
to fix first:
1. update-devfsd in my devfs package isn't executable. I suspect the
debian/rules
script
Previously Russell Coker wrote:
Wichert, how are plans for getting a public repository for these things going?
They should appear at ftp://ftp.valinux.com/pub/people/wichert/
somewhere in the next 30 hours.
Please note that I do expect everyone who uses them to subscribe
to the va-debian-users
On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempting to build current BIND for
slink (separate story), I'm motivated to try to build the latest postfix
(postfix_0.0.20010228-2, which includes LDAP support) for *potato*.
I'm prepared to concede
I'm prepared to concede defeat and upgrade the slink system to potato
(there are other motivating factors here too - things too old just become
too hard sooner or later - OTOH 400 days uptime can be strong motivation
to just let it be).
I agree -- it is hard to upgrade a system when it works
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
Any suggestions other than building all of those for potato (and no, I
don't want to upgrade yet).
I have .deb's of the latest LDAP stuff for Potato. I didn't build them
though. Hopefully we can establish some sort of official repository
On Thursday 08 March 2001 04:29, Neale Banks wrote:
Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempting to build current BIND for
slink (separate story), I'm motivated to try to build the latest postfix
(postfix_0.0.20010228-2, which includes LDAP support) for *potato*.
I'm prepared to concede
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, Russell Coker wrote:
[...]
I think that we need some separate projects for maintaining outdated
distributions of Debian. There's no way I'll touch slink but I have a great
need for potato to be usable with the latest stuff.
Inded, as well as (unsuccessfully) attempting
12 matches
Mail list logo
