On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
But, I could be wrong and not know about some switches. Haven't
really looked into it, I must admit.
It shows with --verbose :)
or in short form: ipchains -vL or -nvL
Learn minimally one new thing on one of the debian-*
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 03:18:22PM +0200, Sven Burgener wrote:
I don't like ipchains --list as it's not as informative as the script
itself. For example, it doesn't show the iface that a particular rule
applies to, so I just browse through the script, amend it and then re-
run it.
But, I
On Mon, Sep 25, 2000 at 12:57:30PM +0200, Mirek Kwasniak wrote:
But, I could be wrong and not know about some switches. Haven't
really looked into it, I must admit.
It shows with --verbose :)
or in short form: ipchains -vL or -nvL
Learn minimally one new thing on one of the debian-*
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
I don't like
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 01:04:12PM +1100, John Ferlito wrote:
try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
Thanks John! That seems to have solved it.
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
I don't like
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
-Nathan
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328 S=0x00 I=59001 F=0x4000 T=250 (#32)
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
-Nathan
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23 22:07:27 host kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17 \
62.2.XX.XX:67 62.2.XX.XX:68 L=328
try 0.0.0.0/0 instead of 0.0.0.0
On Sat, Sep 23, 2000 at 07:57:02PM -0600, Nathan wrote:
What is the output of your ipchains list command? (to list the rules in
effect)
-Nathan
On Sun, 24 Sep 2000, Sven Burgener wrote:
Hi boys'n girls
I have these entries in my logs:
Sep 23
What do I need to change for them to be able to *enter*?
Sven
Bootp and dhcp only use udp and always send their first request to the 'all
ones' broadcast address, AFAIK. I don't think you need the tcp rule at all.
This is the 'eth0-in' ruleset that I use to accept anything from an internal
11 matches
Mail list logo
