On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:57:22AM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
[...]
> I do this because I think if they need to swap that much, there is
> probably Something Wrong, and all that disk access is just going to make
> the machine unusable. May as well let it grind to a halt quickly than
> drag it ou
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 11:57:22AM -0500, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
[...]
> I do this because I think if they need to swap that much, there is
> probably Something Wrong, and all that disk access is just going to make
> the machine unusable. May as well let it grind to a halt quickly than
> drag it o
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 19:17, Richard Arends wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2002, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> But maybe swapd is something to look at: http://cvs.linux.hr/swapd/
> There's a Debian package for it.
I'm using it on my laptop. Works fine for me. A swap partition might be
a tad faster than the swap f
On 12 Feb 2002, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
> larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
> 512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although I
> have more ram than even X + gnome + mozi
> From: Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12 Feb 2002 11:57:22 -0500
>
> For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
> larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
> 512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although I
On Tuesday 12 February 2002 10:57 am, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> Alexis Bory's post earlier today made me think about swap a bit more
> than I usually do. What do other folks on this list do? Zero swap? As
> much swap as physical memory? More? Why? Can you change the swapper's
> priority, and do
For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although I
have more ram than even X + gnome + mozilla + xemacs can use. :-)
I do this because I
On Tue, 2002-02-12 at 19:17, Richard Arends wrote:
> On 12 Feb 2002, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
>
> But maybe swapd is something to look at: http://cvs.linux.hr/swapd/
> There's a Debian package for it.
I'm using it on my laptop. Works fine for me. A swap partition might be
a tad faster than the swap
On 12 Feb 2002, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
> larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
> 512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although I
> have more ram than even X + gnome + moz
> From: Jeff S Wheeler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 12 Feb 2002 11:57:22 -0500
>
> For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
> larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
> 512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although
On Tuesday 12 February 2002 10:57 am, Jeff S Wheeler wrote:
> Alexis Bory's post earlier today made me think about swap a bit more
> than I usually do. What do other folks on this list do? Zero swap? As
> much swap as physical memory? More? Why? Can you change the swapper's
> priority, and d
For years I've been configuring my machines with "small" swap spaces, no
larger than 128MB in most cases, even though most of my systems have
512MB - 1GB of memory. My desktop computer has zero swap, although I
have more ram than even X + gnome + mozilla + xemacs can use. :-)
I do this because I
12 matches
Mail list logo
