client...
I tried to simulate the sam load when dialing with my
windows machine and the link did not drop…
Here is the c/p from syslog:
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppoe[6846]: send (sendPacket): No buffer space
available
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppd[209]: Modem hangup
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppd[209
client...
I tried to simulate the sam load when dialing with my
windows machine and the link did not drop…
Here is the c/p from syslog:
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppoe[6846]: send (sendPacket): No buffer space
available
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppd[209]: Modem hangup
Mar 17 19:42:46 gw pppd[209
n
>option, it's not
>possible.
>
> The first thing I thought was grepping the 'ps axuw'
>command inside ip-up
>scripts to see if this account is already running pppd, but it's not
>possible since: 1. pppd runs suid root so I cannot
>differentiate betwe
s axuw' command inside ip-up
scripts to see if this account is already running pppd, but it's not
possible since: 1. pppd runs suid root so I cannot differentiate between
different running pppds, 2. ip-up scripts doesn't get login information,
just enough to set up some routes. And
system tries to connect,
the LCP messages negotiate back and forth for a while, and then it gives
up.
Here is the most recent log of a Windows XP connection attempt:
---
Aug 11 16:33:28 dialin port[S1]: pppd 2.4.1 started by AutoPPP, uid 0
Hi all .. I discovered my problem .. I have a bad serial DB25 to DB9
converter. I guess not all the line signals were going through.
That, or a bad serial port, but its working now on a different serial
port.
Thank you
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscri
tried mgetty/pppd & portslave/pppd/radiusd-cistron and I'm having
similar problems with pppd in both situations.
For the mgetty situation, when the client connects, mgetty spawns pppd,
which hangs until 'kill'ed. The client PC gives up in a reasonable
amount of time.
Even thou
Hello Sami,
Am 17:28 2002-12-20 +0200 hat Sami Huttu geschrieben:
> - phone: Nokia 6310 (not i) on /dev/ttyS1
>#*
>
>My /etc/ppp/peers/dna -file
>
>#*
>115200
Are you sure, the NOKIA 6310 supports tis speed ???
I
Hi,
Could You help me solve this ISP-connection problem? Connection works fine
2.1 minutes until terminated..
Problem description (pppd debug messages: see syslog below):
- "Cannot determine ethernet address for proxy ARP"
- "No response to 4 echo-requests"
- &quo
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> I have corrected a mistake and now I receive the following message
[SNIP]
> Jun 21 10:06:35 storm pppd[4315]: ChapReceiveResponse: using RADIUS
> Jun 21 10:06:35 storm pptpd[4314]: Error reading from pppd: Input/output
> error
&g
Hi,
On Fri, 21 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> I have corrected a mistake and now I receive the following message
[SNIP]
> Jun 21 10:06:35 storm pppd[4315]: ChapReceiveResponse: using RADIUS
> Jun 21 10:06:35 storm pptpd[4314]: Error reading from pppd: Input/output
> error
&g
than PPP, of course. Sorry.
Sessions other than PPP is one issue (Portslave currently supports rlogin,
telnet, ssh, and SLIP). Another issue is that to provide a login: prompt you
need more than just a module for pppd.
Finally when merging two programs the thing to do is to take the code
than PPP, of course. Sorry.
Sessions other than PPP is one issue (Portslave currently supports rlogin,
telnet, ssh, and SLIP). Another issue is that to provide a login: prompt you
need more than just a module for pppd.
Finally when merging two programs the thing to do is to take the code
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the
> > PPP CVS code uses.
> >
> > I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature
> > of that cod
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the
> PPP CVS code uses.
>
> I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature
> of that code and more I may put Portslave in the PPP CVS. I think we only
re using it like that, although most people who wanted to
do that found it too difficult and used another solution.
> CHAP, never mind MSCHAP with all its frills (not that I think those are
> 'better' than PAP, but that's what my client needed), so I decided that
> hacking a
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
>
> > I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the
> > PPP CVS code uses.
> >
> > I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature
> > of that co
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> I've already started work on CHAP using libradius1, which is also what the
> PPP CVS code uses.
>
> I am going to eat the code that's in the PPP CVS. When I have every feature
> of that code and more I may put Portslave in the PPP CVS. I think we only
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> ###options###
> radius-auth-servers 127.0.0.1:1812/secret
> radius-acct-servers 127.0.0.1:1813/secret
> debug
> lock
> require-chap
> chap-secrets###
> * localhost @secret *
>
>
re using it like that, although most people who wanted to
do that found it too difficult and used another solution.
> CHAP, never mind MSCHAP with all its frills (not that I think those are
> 'better' than PAP, but that's what my client needed), so I decided that
> hacki
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> ###options###
> radius-auth-servers 127.0.0.1:1812/secret
> radius-acct-servers 127.0.0.1:1813/secret
> debug
> lock
> require-chap
> chap-secrets###
> * localhost @secret *
>
###options###
radius-auth-servers 127.0.0.1:1812/secret
radius-acct-servers 127.0.0.1:1813/secret
debug
lock
require-chap
chap-secrets###
* localhost @secret *
maxim * 123 *
in this situation
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> I have spent all the day understanding with work of yours patch for
> pppd. Has appeared still as far as questions. All that I could achieve
> is ACCOUNTIG-STOP packets. To force pppd to connect to radius for
> authorization I could
I have spent all the day understanding with work of yours patch for
pppd. Has appeared still as far as questions. All that I could achieve
is ACCOUNTIG-STOP packets. To force pppd to connect to radius for
authorization I could not.
My config files :
#pptpd.conf
speed 115200
###options###
radius-auth-servers 127.0.0.1:1812/secret
radius-acct-servers 127.0.0.1:1813/secret
debug
lock
require-chap
chap-secrets###
* localhost @secret *
maxim * 123 *
in this situation
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:20, Emile van Bergen wrote (incorrectly ;):
> > >
> > > > Portslave's pppd doesn't do accounting, no.
> > >
> > > Yes it does, it's been doing it for quite a while, and ever
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002 10:20, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > > > Wanted to use xtradius but I can not find pppd working with radius
> > > > (pppd from portslave in such situation to work I think will not be).
> > >
> > > Portslave's pppd doesn't do acc
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> How i can configure pppd to work with radius ? Where i must set ip
> adress of radius server and secret key ?
On pppd's command line (yes, the secret too - sorry). See my webpage and
the documentation in pppd/radius_client.c.
chee
Hi,
On Thu, 20 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> Can Openradius execute any external program when
> "acct-stop" or "acct-start" is recieved ??
> I want use openldap and change some data then the user finnish connection.
It has such a facility, but it works slightly different from most
servers
Emile van Bergen wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:12, Emile van Bergen wrote:
Wanted to use xtradius but I can not find pppd working with radius (pppd
from portslave in such situation to work I think will not be).
Portslave's pppd doesn't do
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:12, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > > Wanted to use xtradius but I can not find pppd working with radius (pppd
> > > from portslave in such situation to work I think will not be).
> >
> > Ports
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002 20:12, Emile van Bergen wrote:
> > Wanted to use xtradius but I can not find pppd working with radius (pppd
> > from portslave in such situation to work I think will not be).
>
> Portslave's pppd doesn't do accounting, no.
Yes it does, it's bee
Hi,
On Wed, 19 Jun 2002, Maxim Kalinkevich wrote:
> How it is possible to organize billing system for VPN clients connected
> through ethrnet in a local network?
Yes, if you have a pppd that does RADIUS accounting. A while ago, I did
a patch for someone that does just that.
> Want
HI!!
How it is possible to organize billing system for VPN clients connected
through ethrnet in a local network?
Wanted to use xtradius but I can not find pppd working with radius (pppd
from portslave in such situation to work I think will not be). The main
thing that there was an opportunity
On Fri, 28 Sep 2001 23:50, Carlos Barros wrote:
> I upgrade the tools to run kernel2.4.9 and the problem is that pppd
> dont work. The version 2.3.11 also dont work. It does not assign the IP.
The kernel documentation says that pppd 2.4.0 is required for kernel 2.4.x.
--
Hello!
I upgrade the tools to run kernel2.4.9 and the problem is that pppd
dont work. The version 2.3.11 also dont work. It does not assign the IP.
With kernel 2.2.19 pppd 2.3.11 works right. Is there any change that
I have to do to the conf files? Is there a known problem?
The
e client.
>
> take all this with a grain of salt, since it's been a while
> since i've last done anything like it.
>
>
>
>
>
> happy ppp-ing,
> adc
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:17:58AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > Hi,
> &g
on this list there are people who
> know a lot about pppd (I hope).
>
> I am trying to set up a network connection between two computers which are
> connected with a serial cable (null modem).
> One computer is an i386 with 2.4.0, the other is an Macintosh Quadra 610
> wit
e client.
>
> take all this with a grain of salt, since it's been a while
> since i've last done anything like it.
>
>
>
>
>
> happy ppp-ing,
> adc
>
>
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2001 at 10:17:58AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> > Hi,
> &g
Hi,
I know that this is not isp related, but on this list there are people who
know a lot about pppd (I hope).
I am trying to set up a network connection between two computers which are
connected with a serial cable (null modem).
One computer is an i386 with 2.4.0, the other is an Macintosh
on this list there are people who
> know a lot about pppd (I hope).
>
> I am trying to set up a network connection between two computers which are
> connected with a serial cable (null modem).
> One computer is an i386 with 2.4.0, the other is an Macintosh Quadra 610
> wit
Hi,
I know that this is not isp related, but on this list there are people who
know a lot about pppd (I hope).
I am trying to set up a network connection between two computers which are
connected with a serial cable (null modem).
One computer is an i386 with 2.4.0, the other is an Macintosh
Hello,
I like to install a small ppp-Server for public access with 8 serial lines
and I need a solution.
I like to do following:
1) The clients can log in with any User-ID/Password combinations
and get a predefined IP-Address (possibel with RADIUS)
2) The user can login as na
Hello,
I like to install a small ppp-Server for public access with 8 serial lines
and I need a solution.
I like to do following:
1) The clients can log in with any User-ID/Password combinations
and get a predefined IP-Address (possibel with RADIUS)
2) The user can login as n
Hello,
last days I'm having some strange problems with pppd, or maybe
even not with pppd but more probably with windows.
Peer is always disabling compression:
CCP terminated by peer
Compression disabled by peer.
[CCP ConfReq id=0x1 ]
[CCP ConfRej id=0x1 ]
[CCP ConfReq id=0x1 <
On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 07:37:08AM +0100, Sebastiaan wrote:
> Hello,
> since a couple of days my dsl connection is not stable anymore and now I
> am searching for some self-recoverable configuration for my server.
>
> I now use the 'persist' option in pppd, as sugge
Hello,
since a couple of days my dsl connection is not stable anymore and now I
am searching for some self-recoverable configuration for my server.
I now use the 'persist' option in pppd, as suggested in a previous answer
to my question. This option seems to look to echorequests
Hello debian-isp,
(Net 192.168.0.0/24)[RTA 192.168.0.1]
Skip many routers and network
(Net 192.168.200.0/24)---[RTB 192.168.220.1, 192.168.0.2]
So I need smth like pppd with proxy arp.
As I here it could be done with the help of ip tunnel but I wouldn't
like to waste an network adress
Roger Waters wrote:
> Debian User wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have the following error message when starting pppd:
> > /usr/sbin/pppd -detach
> > /usr/sbin/pppd: The remote system is required to authenticate itself
> > /usr/sbin/pppd: but I couldn
Hi,
I have the following error message when starting pppd:
/usr/sbin/pppd -detach
/usr/sbin/pppd: The remote system is required to authenticate itself
/usr/sbin/pppd: but I couldn't find any suitable secret (password) for
it to use to do so.
/usr/sbin/pppd: (None of the available pass
Hi,
I have the following error message when starting pppd:
/usr/sbin/pppd -detach
/usr/sbin/pppd: The remote system is required to authenticate itself
/usr/sbin/pppd: but I couldn't find any suitable secret (password) for
it to use to do so.
/usr/sbin/pppd: (None of the available pass
Ok Robert, please send me two things:
1. A copy of your /etc/ppp/options file
2. A copy of the /var/log/ppp log when a log is generated with the
following options:
Include in your /etc/ppp/options:
debug
kdebug 1
auth
-chap
+pap
Using those two, I could tell you what the problem is. (fairly
Ok Robert, please send me two things:
1. A copy of your /etc/ppp/options file
2. A copy of the /var/log/ppp log when a log is generated with the
following options:
Include in your /etc/ppp/options:
debug
kdebug 1
auth
-chap
+pap
Using those two, I could tell you what the problem is. (fairly
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:23:53PM -0400, Larry Morrow wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> As sent from the user, it was open because the example sent
> does NOT have a hostname listed nor a username and so it
> does not matter what options are included , auto PPP would validate
> all requests. I have done lots
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 12:23:53PM -0400, Larry Morrow wrote:
> Nathan,
>
> As sent from the user, it was open because the example sent
> does NOT have a hostname listed nor a username and so it
> does not matter what options are included , auto PPP would validate
> all requests. I have done lot
Nathan,
As sent from the user, it was open because the example sent
does NOT have a hostname listed nor a username and so it
does not matter what options are included , auto PPP would validate
all requests. I have done lots of tests in all configurations and found
this to be the case no matter wh
Nathan,
As sent from the user, it was open because the example sent
does NOT have a hostname listed nor a username and so it
does not matter what options are included , auto PPP would validate
all requests. I have done lots of tests in all configurations and found
this to be the case no matter w
Open yes, but not without authentication.
On my dialin server, /etc/ppp/pap-secrets has:
* chaos "" *
(chaos is the hostname)
The above basicaly tells it to use the /etc/passwd for authentication.
I think the key would be in the debug output from syslog after a user
attempts to d
Make the following change in /etc/pap-secrets
>In /etc/ppp/pap-secrets and /etc/ppp/chap-secrets I have a line like so:
>
>* * "" *
username* "" *
This file controls which users are able to dial-in with ppp.
The very first * is what has your system ope
Open yes, but not without authentication.
On my dialin server, /etc/ppp/pap-secrets has:
* chaos "" *
(chaos is the hostname)
The above basicaly tells it to use the /etc/passwd for authentication.
I think the key would be in the debug output from syslog after a user
attempts to
Make the following change in /etc/pap-secrets
>In /etc/ppp/pap-secrets and /etc/ppp/chap-secrets I have a line like so:
>
>* * "" *
username* "" *
This file controls which users are able to dial-in with ppp.
The very first * is what has your system op
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Robert Davidson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> >
> > Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
> >
> > noauth
> >
> > somewhere
>
> Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
> given the noauth option.
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000, Robert Davidson wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> >
> > Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
> >
> > noauth
> >
> > somewhere
>
> Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
> given the noauth option
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
>
> noauth
>
> somewhere
Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
given the noauth option.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Robert Davidson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
noauth
somewhere
At 12:39 PM 6/22/2000 +1000, Robert Davidson wrote:
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it&#x
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it's not asking the remote machine to
authenticate. It will allow logins with any password, any userna
On Thu, Jun 22, 2000 at 11:03:07AM +0800, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
>
> noauth
>
> somewhere
Nope.. I've checked for that, but it is effectivly acting like it has been
given the noauth option.
Any ideas?
Regards,
Robert Davidson.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Check /etc/ppp/options, you may have a
noauth
somewhere
At 12:39 PM 6/22/2000 +1000, Robert Davidson wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
>and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
>
>
Hi all,
I've got a linux box set up as a ppp server, using mgetty with AutoPPP
and pppd (2.3.11-1.4 - Potato's current version as far as I know).
The problem seems to be that it's not asking the remote machine to
authenticate. It will allow logins with any password, any userna
hi,
I'm having a problem with pppd (deb version 2.3.5-2) on a slink box.
IPCP doesn't appear to be either logging or working properly.
a user dials in
mgetty answers, detects PPP frames and starts pppd
pppd does LCP negotiation
pppd authenticates the user with PA
hi,
I'm having a problem with pppd (deb version 2.3.5-2) on a slink box.
IPCP doesn't appear to be either logging or working properly.
a user dials in
mgetty answers, detects PPP frames and starts pppd
pppd does LCP negotiation
pppd authenticates the user with PA
Does the contents of your /etc/pam.d/ppp file read:
#%PAM-1.0
# Information for the PPPD process with the 'login' option.
authrequiredpam_securetty.so
authrequiredpam_nologin.so
authsufficient pam_radius_auth.so
authrequiredpam_unix_auth.
Hi, all
I'm trying to use dial-in ppp server with the folloing config:
mgetty monitors modem. On detecting AutoPPP fires pppd (with pam support)
pppd authorize user via radiusd throug pam_radius_auth.so get from
freeradius.org.
The problem is the following:
User authenticated only if he exis
know of a way to force a pppd script (created by pppconfig)
>to dial and execute ATDT9,1234567 even if there is no dial tone ?
>The reason is that, I am behind a PABX system, and traditional
>ATDT9,1234567 or ATDT9w1234567 wont work because in our PABX, unless
>you dial local 9 firs
Usually ATX3 does the trick :)))... so it would be atx3dt9,1234567
Best regards
"Jersey"
--
From: t s a d i[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 11:38 AM
To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: forcing pppd to dial even on a different tone
hell
hello Everyone,
Anybody know of a way to force a pppd script (created by pppconfig)
to dial and execute ATDT9,1234567 even if there is no dial tone ?
The reason is that, I am behind a PABX system, and traditional
ATDT9,1234567 or ATDT9w1234567 wont work because in our PABX, unless
you
>I've recently got my modem to dial into my ISP using minicom, but when
>I try to use pppd all I can do is dial in and send my username and
>password, which is accepted but then I get disconnected. I get the
>following error message on my xconsole:
>pppd[xxx] error: Receive
I've recently got my modem to dial into my ISP using minicom, but when
I try to use pppd all I can do is dial in and send my username and
password, which is accepted but then I get disconnected. I get the
following error message on my xconsole:
pppd[xxx] error: Receive serial link is not
78 matches
Mail list logo
