Hello Christian,
>From the keyboard of Christian,
> Hi
>
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
>
> The problem with balancing b
Hello Christian,
>From the keyboard of Christian,
> Hi
>
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
>
> The problem with balancing
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 06:14:23PM +0100, Russell Coker wrote:
> 1) Use rsync to transfer files, and for writes have some sort of database
> push (EG use ssh to run a program on the primary server which does the
> update). Then of course the data you read won't be as new as the data you've
> w
On Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:47, Christian Hammers wrote:
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
>
> The problem with balancing between tw
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> > number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> > topology allows for the performance requirements.
> Does it really allow writin
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> topology allows for the performance requirements.
Does it really allow writing in *both*
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
number of differen
> On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> > RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> > number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> > topology allows for the performance requirements.
> Does it really allow writi
On Sun, Nov 11, 2001 at 02:09:01PM +1100, Jeff Waugh wrote:
> RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
> number of different machines, perhaps even on different networks if the
> topology allows for the performance requirements.
Does it really allow writing in *both*
> Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
> good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
> connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
RAID on Network Block Devices. You get the benefits of RAID, but over a
number of differe
Hi
Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
The problem with balancing between two servers is that the might host
web-servers that could
Hi
Much is written about High-Availability servers but I still didn't find a
good solution how to build two load-balanced webservers _without_
connecting them both to one RAID (single point of failure).
The problem with balancing between two servers is that the might host
web-servers that coul
12 matches
Mail list logo
