Re: sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

2002-03-14 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 11:21:17AM -0500, Richard A Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 42 lines which said: > You have FEATURE(`allmasquerade') Correct? You were right... > Try FEATURE(`limited_masquerade') and add *ONLY* the hosts you to > masquerade (localhost, etc) to class {M}

Re: sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

2002-03-12 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
On Mon, Mar 11, 2002 at 07:12:42PM -0500, Bulent Murtezaoglu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 15 lines which said: > What else do you have in your .mc ? Masquerading options maybe? Ooops, here it is (domain names changed). Can I have both masquerading and virtusertable or should I tr

sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

2002-03-11 Thread Bulent Murtezaoglu
SB> If I send a mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] when the main domain is SB> dot.bar and I have in the virtusertable: SB> [EMAIL PROTECTED] bortzmeyer SB> the mail is received with a header: SB> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] SB> which is not what the customer wants. What else do you hav

sendmail and virtual hosting: still a small annoying problem

2002-03-11 Thread Stephane Bortzmeyer
I'm clearly rusty in sendmail (I now use Postfix but a customer wants to keep sendmail) and I have a small but annoying problem with virtual hosting. I have implemented: http://www.sendmail.org/virtual-hosting.html with a M4 configuration file as instructed above. It works fine except that T