From: "Tinus Nijmeijers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > (I maintain vm-pop3d. It doesn't support that. I have thought about it
> > before, but I am more concerned with users that continue to leave mail
on
> > server. I am more interested in a non-RFC op
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> (I maintain vm-pop3d. It doesn't support that. I have thought about it
> before, but I am more concerned with users that continue to leave mail on
> server. I am more interested in a non-RFC option so all RETReived mail is
> DELEted automatically
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2002, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
>
> > Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them (if they checked again
> > within 10 minutes of the last time): "no messages".
>
> nupop does UIDL and STAT caching (using Berkeley DB) already so it
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:11:28 +0200 Roger Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello.
> Well, scripts looking into logfiles, and each account that checks too
> often gets
> suddenly blocked.. change password or whatever, and then restore it 5/10
>
> minutes
> later.. that should do the trick.
From: "Tinus Nijmeijers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> > (I maintain vm-pop3d. It doesn't support that. I have thought about it
> > before, but I am more concerned with users that continue to leave mail
on
> > server. I am more interested in a non-RFC o
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> (I maintain vm-pop3d. It doesn't support that. I have thought about it
> before, but I am more concerned with users that continue to leave mail on
> server. I am more interested in a non-RFC option so all RETReived mail is
> DELEted automaticall
On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 02:20, Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2002, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
>
> > Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them (if they checked again
> > within 10 minutes of the last time): "no messages".
>
> nupop does UIDL and STAT caching (using Berkeley DB) already so it
On Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:11:28 +0200 Roger Abrahamsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Hello.
> Well, scripts looking into logfiles, and each account that checks too
> often gets
> suddenly blocked.. change password or whatever, and then restore it 5/10
>
> minutes
> later.. that should do the trick
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 20:16, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 11:11, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > >I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
> > >other minute or so.
> > suddenly blocked.. change password or whatever, and then restore it 5/10
> > m
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 20:16, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 11:11, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> > >I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
> > >other minute or so.
> > suddenly blocked.. change password or whatever, and then restore it 5/10
> >
On 26 Jun 2002, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them (if they checked again
> within 10 minutes of the last time): "no messages".
nupop does UIDL and STAT caching (using Berkeley DB) already so it would
probably be easy to add that feature.
http://nupop.nuvox.
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 11:11, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> Hello.
> Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
> >other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
> >now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle th
On 26 Jun 2002, Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them (if they checked again
> within 10 minutes of the last time): "no messages".
nupop does UIDL and STAT caching (using Berkeley DB) already so it would
probably be easy to add that feature.
http://nupop.nuvox
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 11:11, Roger Abrahamsson wrote:
> Hello.
> Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
> >Hi,
> >I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
> >other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
> >now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle t
Hello.
Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
Hi,
I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle their checking. max once
per 10 min's for instance.
Ideal would be to
Hi,
I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle their checking. max once
per 10 min's for instance.
Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them (
Hello.
Tinus Nijmeijers wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
>other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
>now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle their checking. max once
>per 10 min's for instance.
>Ideal w
Hi,
I'm having the problem that users are checking their mail (pop3) every
other minute or so. no problem with the 200 accounts that we have right
now, but I wouldn't mind being able to throttle their checking. max once
per 10 min's for instance.
Ideal would be to let the pop3 server tell them
18 matches
Mail list logo
