On 2000-11-16 10:19, Santiago Palmier Campos wrote:
>As Rod said, RAID 1 is a mirroring solution and RAID 5 can be called
>something like "stripping with data recovery" ;)
>
>But what you must consider is...
> RAID 1 is faster for _reading_ data (as it uses only 1 disk for
>read)
RAID-1 is
> Raid 1 is faster than a single drive for reads, but about the same for
> writes. To get more speed, use raid 0+1, striping plus mirroring. That
> wastes a lot of disk, but is faster than level 5 for writes. Keep in
> mind, RAID 1 is only mirroring using two disks (typical).
>
> Raid 5 is slow
data storage, obviously with
> a good backup policy ;o) but I don't know if it's possible at your hosting
> company :o?
>
> Best regards
> Santy
>
> -Original Message-
> From: R. W. Rodolico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: jueves, 16 de noviembre de 200
& RAID 1 for data storage, obviously with
a good backup policy ;o) but I don't know if it's possible at your hosting
company :o?
Best regards
Santy
-Original Message-
From: R. W. Rodolico [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: jueves, 16 de noviembre de 2000 4:47
To: [EM
RAID 5. Easy to set up, fast, and reliable. Uses more disks, however.
RAID 1 is, I believe, mirroring. With that, all info must be written to
two different disks. With RAID 5, the disks are "striped" (not really,
but I don't remember the real name for it) and part of each byte, with a
checksum, g
hello,
my hosting company told me that they only support either RAID 1 and RAID 5.
so given this choice, w/c would you suggest?
i use a MySQL database for a bulletin board application w/c does _LOTS_ of
SELECTS and data lookup.
thanks in advance,
chad
_
6 matches
Mail list logo
