On Monday 28 June 2004 20.56, Joris wrote:
> I noticed the following just now in my apache logs:
[...]
> Notice the very uncool double reverse resolve of that ip:
AFAIK such double reverse resolves are, while uncommon, perfectly legal.
> I don't know what's the dominant feeling on this right now.
On Monday 28 June 2004 20.56, Joris wrote:
> I noticed the following just now in my apache logs:
[...]
> Notice the very uncool double reverse resolve of that ip:
AFAIK such double reverse resolves are, while uncommon, perfectly legal.
> I don't know what's the dominant feeling on this right now.
Hi,
I noticed the following just now in my apache logs:
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:11:46 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 6137
"-" "-"
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:12:00 +0200] "GET /index.php HTTP/1.0"
404 269 "-" "-"
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:12:00 +0200] "GET /main.php HTTP/
Hi,
I noticed the following just now in my apache logs:
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:11:46 +0200] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 6137
"-" "-"
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:12:00 +0200] "GET /index.php HTTP/1.0"
404 269 "-" "-"
208.200.158.49 - - [28/Jun/2004:20:12:00 +0200] "GET /main.php HTTP/
4 matches
Mail list logo