On Fri, Jul 20, 2001 at 02:00:13PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> Causes of mail loss I've seen include failings of Sun Cluster manager (which
> trashes file systems and presumably loses files). Crashes of commercial mail
> server software also tends to lose lots of mail. Then there's the issue
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:19, Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
> > "CS" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> (quoting Russel Coker, all snipped sorry if snipped too much)
> RC> I haven't bothered investigating this in depth. If one of my
> RC> servers crashes the possibility that on
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 09:19:29PM -0400, Bulent Murtezaoglu wrote:
> Hmm. I beg to differ. I expect people I buy infrastructure from to
> care about not losing mail. If the daemon 250's the DATA in the SMTP
> conversation it should guard it with more than its life. In an ideal
> world.
i car
> "CS" == Craig Sanders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
(quoting Russel Coker, all snipped sorry if snipped too much)
RC> I haven't bothered investigating this in depth. If one of my
RC> servers crashes the possibility that one message may be lost is
RC> really the least of my concern
On Thu, Jul 19, 2001 at 06:06:55PM +0200, Russell Coker wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Jul 2001 15:48, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
> > CS> if i was running a news spool or a large Maildir/ spool, i think i'd
> > CS> stick with reiserfs but this is my workstation, where i have lots of
> > CS> large files (inc
5 matches
Mail list logo
