On Monday 4 September 2000, at 2 h 22, the keyboard of Matt Zimmerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from the
Java source?
If the package is in
On Monday 4 September 2000, at 2 h 22, the keyboard of Matt Zimmerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from
the
Java source?
If the package is in
[CCed to:
debian-java, where this thread originated
the wnpp bug for Enhydra
debian-devel, to get broader input on source packaging issues
Please trim CC list as appropriate]
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
If the package is in
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:22:41PM -0400, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
On Tue, Sep 05, 2000 at 02:55:48PM +0200, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the
sources. IMHO (but IANAL), for a package to get in 'main', you HAVE
TO be able to compile it from
it acceptable to use the upstream binary tarball as the .orig for a Debian
source package, as it is architecture-independent? Or must it compile from
the
Java source?
If the package is in 'non-free', you don't even need the sources. IMHO (but
IANAL), for a package to get in 'main',
5 matches
Mail list logo