I hope this is not a redundant question, or maybe stupid because I have missed
something on the list that I should have paid better attention to on
the list. But.
What and Where are the current .deb files for the SMI JDK?
I notice that they were in the incoming machine but are now gone.
Is t
I hope this is not a redundant question, or maybe stupid because I have missed
something on the list that I should have paid better attention to on
the list. But.
What and Where are the current .deb files for the SMI JDK?
I notice that they were in the incoming machine but are now gone.
Is
> "GOMEZ" == GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GOMEZ> Yep, I added also in tomcat bin wrapper a :
GOMEZ> chown -R tcuser:tcuser /var/tomcat/
GOMEZ> to make sure that tomcat is running with the rigth profile
That is not a good idea. The tomcat user should not own any files
(besides log
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> So static parts inside the /mywebapp directoy were served by
Stefan> Apache directly and dynamic parts (JSP pags and servlets) were
Stefan> passed to Tomcat using mod_jk. This changed in Tomcat 3.3: All
Stefan> files inside /myweba
> "GOMEZ" == GOMEZ Henri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
GOMEZ> Yep, I added also in tomcat bin wrapper a :
GOMEZ> chown -R tcuser:tcuser /var/tomcat/
GOMEZ> to make sure that tomcat is running with the rigth profile
That is not a good idea. The tomcat user should not own any files
(besides lo
> "Stefan" == Stefan Gybas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Stefan> So static parts inside the /mywebapp directoy were served by
Stefan> Apache directly and dynamic parts (JSP pags and servlets) were
Stefan> passed to Tomcat using mod_jk. This changed in Tomcat 3.3: All
Stefan> files inside /myweb
>> I consider that a bug, and should probably file one. tomcat
>should not run as
>> the same user as apache, for security reasons.
>
>In previous versions the auto-generated config file looked like this:
>
>JkMount /mywebapp/*.jsp ajp12
>
> AllowOverride None
> deny from all
>
>
> AllowOverri
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:43:31PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> I consider that a bug, and should probably file one. tomcat should not run as
> the same user as apache, for security reasons.
In previous versions the auto-generated config file looked like this:
JkMount /mywebapp/*.jsp ajp12
All
>> I consider that a bug, and should probably file one. tomcat
>should not run as
>> the same user as apache, for security reasons.
>
>In previous versions the auto-generated config file looked like this:
>
>JkMount /mywebapp/*.jsp ajp12
>
> AllowOverride None
> deny from all
>
>
> AllowOverr
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 02:43:31PM -0600, Adam Heath wrote:
> I consider that a bug, and should probably file one. tomcat should not run as
> the same user as apache, for security reasons.
In previous versions the auto-generated config file looked like this:
JkMount /mywebapp/*.jsp ajp12
Al
>Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
>> Debian doesn't use RPM as part of the package management
>> infrastructure, and any limitations of RPM is therefore irrelevant to
>> how Debian should handle javadoc, and (in general) Debian policy.
>>
>> So, again: why should Debian policy care about RPM systems?
>
>
Yes, in my RPM, i use differents users for apache,
tomcat 3.3 and tomcat 4.0
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Origina
>Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
>
>> Debian doesn't use RPM as part of the package management
>> infrastructure, and any limitations of RPM is therefore irrelevant to
>> how Debian should handle javadoc, and (in general) Debian policy.
>>
>> So, again: why should Debian policy care about RPM systems?
>
>
Yes, in my RPM, i use differents users for apache,
tomcat 3.3 and tomcat 4.0
-
Henri Gomez ___[_]
EMAIL : [EMAIL PROTECTED](. .)
PGP KEY : 697ECEDD...oOOo..(_)..oOOo...
PGP Fingerprint : 9DF8 1EA8 ED53 2F39 DC9B 904A 364F 80E6
>-Origin
14 matches
Mail list logo
