[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Looking very much forward to the eclipse package...
Quite a bit of learning in this experience, but I back-built Takashi's
packages to woody. They install nicely, but give me a error finding
SAX. I have SAX in my classpath or think I do. From the workspace log:
!SESSI
From: John Lavin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: eclipse on woody
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:36:21 -0500
> And the file *does* exist:
> $ ls -l /usr/share/java/xerces.jar
> -rw-r--r--1 root root 758565 Sep 1 2001
> /usr/share/java/xerces.jar
Eclipse needs xerces 2 but above jar is x
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
> Looking very much forward to the eclipse package...
Quite a bit of learning in this experience, but I back-built Takashi's
packages to woody. They install nicely, but give me a error finding
SAX. I have SAX in my classpath or think I do. From the workspace log:
!SESSI
I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
now. Please check here:
http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
Takashi Okamoto
I uploaded initial eclipse 2.1M4 package though it may very ugly
now. Please check here:
http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse
Takashi Okamoto
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:04:19PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
> Ben> all.
>
> I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
> packages. I wo
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 11:04:19PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> > "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
> Ben> all.
>
> I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
> packages. I wo
Hi,
> > I recommend you to wait 2.1M5 package. It will be better than current
> > package.
> If for just the learning experience, I am going to continue trying. I
> seem to be close and want to see if I can get through to a built deb.
> If I suceed, I will return the diff with the changes I neede
Takashi Okamoto said:
> Sorry, not sooner reply. Build-Depend in control isn't complete cleary
> and it caused errors.
that is true. also you had the package eclipse recursively dependant.
> Would you install csh?
I'll add csh to the build-depend and see if build gets farther.
> I recommend you
Hi,
> > I recommend you to wait 2.1M5 package. It will be better than current
> > package.
> If for just the learning experience, I am going to continue trying. I
> seem to be close and want to see if I can get through to a built deb.
> If I suceed, I will return the diff with the changes I neede
Takashi Okamoto said:
> Sorry, not sooner reply. Build-Depend in control isn't complete cleary
> and it caused errors.
that is true. also you had the package eclipse recursively dependant.
> Would you install csh?
I'll add csh to the build-depend and see if build gets farther.
> I recommend you
From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
> Well the problem is libbcel-java,
I confirmed some of test fail with JDK1.4, it may cause error.
I'm not sure your problem is fixed or not, but could you try bcel at
On Saturday 08 February 2003 10:08, David Goodenough wrote:
> As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
> about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I
> fired up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble
> started.
>
> Thi
As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I fired
up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble started.
This box already had G{CI}J installed, and I had noticed that this seemed
From: David Goodenough <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Tomcat 4.1 (unstable) won't install
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:23:26 +
> Well the problem is libbcel-java,
I confirmed some of test fail with JDK1.4, it may cause error.
I'm not sure your problem is fixed or not, but could you try bcel at
On Saturday 08 February 2003 10:08, David Goodenough wrote:
> As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
> about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I
> fired up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble
> started.
>
> Thi
As I was having some problems with tomcat 4.0.4 on testing (see my note
about JSTL) I thought I would try tomcat 4.1 on my unstable box. So I fired
up the install and downloaded over 40Mb of data, then the trouble started.
This box already had G{CI}J installed, and I had noticed that this seemed
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ben> The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing from at
Ben> all.
I got your message and will be including the change in the next j2se
packages. I won't beincluding it in the jdk1.1 package because the
ftp-nasters have alread
> "Ben" == Ben Burton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
The jdk1.1 and j2se1.4 maintainer I've heard nothing
Ben> from at all.
--
Stephen
They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety -- Benjamin Franklin
19 matches
Mail list logo
