Bug#180929: ftp.debian.org: Remove jdk1.1 packages from archive

2003-02-13 Thread Stephen Zander
Package: ftp.debian.org Version: 20030214 Severity: serious Packages: jdk1.1, jdk1.1-native, jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native-dev They're non-free, they're buggy because the ftp-masters refused to even look at an upload for over six months, and I have no enthusiasm for continuing to pursue support for Su

Bug#180929: ftp.debian.org: Remove jdk1.1 packages from archive

2003-02-13 Thread Stephen Zander
Package: ftp.debian.org Version: 20030214 Severity: serious Packages: jdk1.1, jdk1.1-native, jdk1.1-dev jdk1.1-native-dev They're non-free, they're buggy because the ftp-masters refused to even look at an upload for over six months, and I have no enthusiasm for continuing to pursue support for Su

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:26:52PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this? > > Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been > distributing for longer than the five years I've

Re: JNI Installation Directories: Another push

2003-02-13 Thread Ola Lundqvist
Hello On Wed, Feb 12, 2003 at 06:26:52PM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote: > > "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Ola> Well. Do they have any reason for this? > > Concerns about the redistribution of code that Debian has been > distributing for longer than the five years I've

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-02-13 Thread Anthony Green
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 06:07, Brett Smith wrote: > At this point, I'm stumped again. If anybody has any suggestions as to > where the problem might lie, they would be a tremendous help. The problem is that Class.forName is not able to find the driver in the shared library you just built. Run your

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-02-13 Thread Brett Smith
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:57:08PM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > That's right - it works very well. If you're using a recent version of > gcj, you should be able to check the sources out from > http://sources.redhat.com/rhug and simply configure/make/install a > shared library version of this driv

Re: j2sdk1.3.1 + libc6 problem

2003-02-13 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
Am Mit, 2002-12-11 um 13.19 schrieb Juergen Kreileder: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > > >> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) > >> in nearest future? > > > > No it will neve

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-02-13 Thread Anthony Green
On Thu, 2003-02-13 at 06:07, Brett Smith wrote: > At this point, I'm stumped again. If anybody has any suggestions as to > where the problem might lie, they would be a tremendous help. The problem is that Class.forName is not able to find the driver in the shared library you just built. Run your

Re: Questions about using libpgjava

2003-02-13 Thread Brett Smith
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 09:57:08PM -0800, Anthony Green wrote: > That's right - it works very well. If you're using a recent version of > gcj, you should be able to check the sources out from > http://sources.redhat.com/rhug and simply configure/make/install a > shared library version of this driv

Re: j2sdk1.3.1 + libc6 problem

2003-02-13 Thread Sobkowiak Krzysztof
Am Mit, 2002-12-11 um 13.19 schrieb Juergen Kreileder: > Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2002 at 12:15:41PM +0100, Sobkowiak Krzysztof wrote: > > >> Is it possible that I'll can use again j2sdk1.3.1 with Debian (Sid) > >> in nearest future? > > > > No it will neve