-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|
| > AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought
| > that this depends on
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports
Tom> will be very difficult.
Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your
Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :))
The SWT maintainers
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:27:08 +0100
> Thank you for the quick answer. You gave me the input to solve the problem:
> Eclipse depends on libxerces2-java package (which contains XercesJ v2.3.0),
> but
> this Xerces is TOO
The policy states that "I /should/ use /etc/alternatives for the name
'java' if they are command-line compatible with the Sun's java program."
First, I suppose that "I" is a typo, and should read "They".
Second, should we specify that they should also treat the environment
variables like Sun's j
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
> to apply it.
Seconded again, this time with a signature. :)
b.
- --
Ben Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is much to be said in favour of modern
> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
> to apply it.
Seconded.
b. :)
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Tom> However, note that SWT is not 64-bit clean. So certain ports
Tom> will be very difficult.
Jan> File Bugs :) If I read your email right, you're (-> your
Jan> firm..) actually a member of the eclipse board, so ... :))
The SWT maintainers
From: Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1: Bug?
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 21:27:08 +0100
> Thank you for the quick answer. You gave me the input to solve the problem:
> Eclipse depends on libxerces2-java package (which contains XercesJ v2.3.0), but
> this Xerces is TOO NE
The policy states that "I /should/ use /etc/alternatives for the name
'java' if they are command-line compatible with the Sun's java program."
First, I suppose that "I" is a typo, and should read "They".
Second, should we specify that they should also treat the environment
variables like Sun's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
> to apply it.
Seconded again, this time with a signature. :)
b.
- --
Ben Burton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Public Key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There is much to be said in favour of modern
> I second this policy change. I would like one more to be able
> to apply it.
Seconded.
b. :)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thank you for the quick answer. You gave me the input to solve the problem:
Eclipse depends on libxerces2-java package (which contains XercesJ v2.3.0), but
this Xerces is TOO NEW for Eclipse! I've extracted the Xerces JARs
(xercesImpl.jar and xmlParserAPI's.jar; no idea from which version they are.
Hello Tom,
Sorry for the personal mail, didn't see, that the list was
included as well.
* Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[swt]
> Porting to PPC should be very easy. I've built it (the one from
> Eclipse 2.0.1) on my PPC box but I've never actually tested it.
> However, note that SWT is no
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
Jan> doesn't matter, which platform.
Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc
Thank you for the quick answer. You gave me the input to solve the problem:
Eclipse depends on libxerces2-java package (which contains XercesJ v2.3.0), but
this Xerces is TOO NEW for Eclipse! I've extracted the Xerces JARs
(xercesImpl.jar and xmlParserAPI's.jar; no idea from which version they are.
Hello Tom,
Sorry for the personal mail, didn't see, that the list was
included as well.
* Tom Tromey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[swt]
> Porting to PPC should be very easy. I've built it (the one from
> Eclipse 2.0.1) on my PPC box but I've never actually tested it.
> However, note that SWT is no
> "Jan" == Jan Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jan> AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
Jan> this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
Jan> doesn't matter, which platform.
Jan> Anyway, If it is not possible to build swt on linux/ppc
* Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on
> j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3.
Hm, I haven't noticed that: I had sun java 1.4.1x and now the
blackdown debs (1.4.xbeta99 or so), and an both eclipse was/is
very s
Hello.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:46:00AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Hello
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> >> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
> eclipse) for linux ppc?
AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
doesn't matter, which p
Hello,
* Thomas J. Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
> Yup. As someone else already mentioned, eclipse is very single-user pc
> minded. :(
There is a discussion on "starting and updating eclipse":
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_
* Florian Steinsiepe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on
> j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3.
Hm, I haven't noticed that: I had sun java 1.4.1x and now the
blackdown debs (1.4.xbeta99 or so), and an both eclipse was/is
very s
Hello.
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:46:00AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >Hello
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
> >> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>
Hi,
I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on
j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3. Since then, some functions don't work
anymore and throw lots of NoSuchMethodErrors (as found in the
~/eclipse/.metadata/.log file) especially on executing an action in the
Run/Debu
* Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
> eclipse) for linux ppc?
AFAIK the only problem should be the swt library and I thought that
this depends on gtk or motiv and both should be availible on linux,
doesn't matter, which p
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hello
>
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
>> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >Hi
>> >
>> >Well there seems
Hello,
* Thomas J. Zeeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It looks good. It seems I should modify eclipse code for it:(
> Yup. As someone else already mentioned, eclipse is very single-user pc
> minded. :(
There is a discussion on "starting and updating eclipse":
http://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:58:07 +0100 (CET)
> I'll try your new package (I already have an older) on my x86 desktop
> at work, but I have a G3 at home (with debian)... I can't build
> Eclipse from sources on it!
I don't ha
Hi,
I greedily installed the Eclipse package and found it extremely unstable on
j2sdk1.4, so I went back to j2sdk1.3. Since then, some functions don't work
anymore and throw lots of NoSuchMethodErrors (as found in the
~/eclipse/.metadata/.log file) especially on executing an action in the
Run/Debu
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Hello
>
>On Wed, Feb 26, 2003 at 08:16:01AM -0800, T. Alexander Popiel wrote:
>> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >Hi
>> >
>> >Well there seems
Thank you all guys, it rocked here with blackdown 1.4.1 (beta) :]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I uploaded new eclipse package.
Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
eclipse) for linux ppc?
I'll try your new p
From: Arnaud Vandyck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Eclipse2.1RC1 package
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 12:58:07 +0100 (CET)
> I'll try your new package (I already have an older) on my x86 desktop
> at work, but I have a G3 at home (with debian)... I can't build
> Eclipse from sources on it!
I don't ha
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
I just had a look at the package file there (It isn'T sundy yet,
where I have free net access...) and I'm wondering, whether the
pde envi
Thank you all guys, it rocked here with blackdown 1.4.1 (beta) :]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
___
/ Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I uploaded new eclipse package.
Do you know if there is (or will be) a port of your package (or of
eclipse) for linux ppc?
I'll try your new p
Hello,
* Takashi Okamoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I uploaded new eclipse package. Please check here:
> deb http://yamaguch.sytes.net/~tora/tmp/eclipse/ ./
I just had a look at the package file there (It isn'T sundy yet,
where I have free net access...) and I'm wondering, whether the
pde envi
37 matches
Mail list logo
